The guy attacks another motorist that happens to be a cop, gets shot for his troubles, & the community wants to protest it? They probably have no idea what happened.....just sounded like a good reason to misbehave.
Delrawn Small shooting....
The guy attacks another motorist that happens to be a cop, gets shot for his troubles, & the community wants to protest it? They probably have no idea what happened.....just sounded like a good reason to misbehave.
The guy attacks another motorist that happens to be a cop, gets shot for his troubles, & the community wants to protest it? They probably have no idea what happened.....just sounded like a good reason to misbehave.
You're right, they have no idea what happened at all. Just looking to start trouble and get their faces on camera.
You're right, they have no idea what happened at all. Just looking to start trouble and get their faces on camera.
You're right, they have no idea what happened at all. Just looking to start trouble and get their faces on camera.
You're right, they have no idea what happened at all. Just looking to start trouble and get their faces on camera.
https://nypost.com/2016/07/07/video-shows-motorist-punching-off-duty-cop-before-fatal-shooting/
The guy attacks another motorist that happens to be a cop, gets shot for his troubles, & the community wants to protest it? They probably have no idea what happened.....just sounded like a good reason to misbehave.
So Mugg, how long was it going to take for you to update the new video on this post? I'm sure you've seen the new footage by now.
Or haven't you? I mean, someone who starts a thread on a topic surely should have the integrity to follow through on it not even a day later, particularly when relevant evidence emerges...
Because we all can infer the intent of the OP right?
The post was made at the same time the posts concerning the Sterling and Castile shooting.
And it wants to point a finger at someone who is black who 'earned two in the chest and one in the head' as SearchWarrant so classily points out (now there's a man of integrity if you need an example). His wording there really hits home on his mindset regarding all this. Shoot first, ask questions later, especially if the person you are shooting...do I need to finish?
Then you can all nod at each other on your barstools and gleefully wallow in the death of another emotionally (who, lo and behold, just happens to be black).
Or should we all whip out or weapons and discharge them instantly on any and all who approaches you? I'm sure that will be your answer. I'm sure, even with the video, as with the videos of Sterling and Castile, you will find some wiggle room to justify your OP even in the face of evidence that is completely contradictory to the original claims. Or maybe others will do it for you.
So maybe, you don't even need to post again. We all know your answer. Your answer, like the ilk that resides here, has always and will always suit your prejudices.
Anyhow, back to web surfing to find OP's to suit your needs at the perfect time.
https://nypost.com/2016/07/07/video-shows-motorist-punching-off-duty-cop-before-fatal-shooting/
The guy attacks another motorist that happens to be a cop, gets shot for his troubles, & the community wants to protest it? They probably have no idea what happened.....just sounded like a good reason to misbehave.
So Mugg, how long was it going to take for you to update the new video on this post? I'm sure you've seen the new footage by now.
Or haven't you? I mean, someone who starts a thread on a topic surely should have the integrity to follow through on it not even a day later, particularly when relevant evidence emerges...
Because we all can infer the intent of the OP right?
The post was made at the same time the posts concerning the Sterling and Castile shooting.
And it wants to point a finger at someone who is black who 'earned two in the chest and one in the head' as SearchWarrant so classily points out (now there's a man of integrity if you need an example). His wording there really hits home on his mindset regarding all this. Shoot first, ask questions later, especially if the person you are shooting...do I need to finish?
Then you can all nod at each other on your barstools and gleefully wallow in the death of another emotionally (who, lo and behold, just happens to be black).
Or should we all whip out or weapons and discharge them instantly on any and all who approaches you? I'm sure that will be your answer. I'm sure, even with the video, as with the videos of Sterling and Castile, you will find some wiggle room to justify your OP even in the face of evidence that is completely contradictory to the original claims. Or maybe others will do it for you.
So maybe, you don't even need to post again. We all know your answer. Your answer, like the ilk that resides here, has always and will always suit your prejudices.
Anyhow, back to web surfing to find OP's to suit your needs at the perfect time.
I mean, someone who starts a thread on a topic surely should have the integrity to follow through on it not even a day later, particularly when relevant evidence emerges...
I mean, someone who starts a thread on a topic surely should have the integrity to follow through on it not even a day later, particularly when relevant evidence emerges...
So Mugg, how long was it going to take for you to update the new video on this post? I'm sure you've seen the new footage by now.
Or haven't you? I mean, someone who starts a thread on a topic surely should have the integrity to follow through on it not even a day later, particularly when relevant evidence emerges...
Because we all can infer the intent of the OP right?
The post was made at the same time the posts concerning the Sterling and Castile shooting.
And it wants to point a finger at someone who is black who 'earned two in the chest and one in the head' as SearchWarrant so classily points out (now there's a man of integrity if you need an example). His wording there really hits home on his mindset regarding all this. Shoot first, ask questions later, especially if the person you are shooting...do I need to finish?
Then you can all nod at each other on your barstools and gleefully wallow in the death of another emotionally (who, lo and behold, just happens to be black).
Or should we all whip out or weapons and discharge them instantly on any and all who approaches you? I'm sure that will be your answer. I'm sure, even with the video, as with the videos of Sterling and Castile, you will find some wiggle room to justify your OP even in the face of evidence that is completely contradictory to the original claims. Or maybe others will do it for you.
So maybe, you don't even need to post again. We all know your answer. Your answer, like the ilk that resides here, has always and will always suit your prejudices.
Anyhow, back to web surfing to find OP's to suit your needs at the perfect time.
So Mugg, how long was it going to take for you to update the new video on this post? I'm sure you've seen the new footage by now.
Or haven't you? I mean, someone who starts a thread on a topic surely should have the integrity to follow through on it not even a day later, particularly when relevant evidence emerges...
Because we all can infer the intent of the OP right?
The post was made at the same time the posts concerning the Sterling and Castile shooting.
And it wants to point a finger at someone who is black who 'earned two in the chest and one in the head' as SearchWarrant so classily points out (now there's a man of integrity if you need an example). His wording there really hits home on his mindset regarding all this. Shoot first, ask questions later, especially if the person you are shooting...do I need to finish?
Then you can all nod at each other on your barstools and gleefully wallow in the death of another emotionally (who, lo and behold, just happens to be black).
Or should we all whip out or weapons and discharge them instantly on any and all who approaches you? I'm sure that will be your answer. I'm sure, even with the video, as with the videos of Sterling and Castile, you will find some wiggle room to justify your OP even in the face of evidence that is completely contradictory to the original claims. Or maybe others will do it for you.
So maybe, you don't even need to post again. We all know your answer. Your answer, like the ilk that resides here, has always and will always suit your prejudices.
Anyhow, back to web surfing to find OP's to suit your needs at the perfect time.
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 460,352
- Thursday 10/08/2026 433
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 269,875
- TB/BOYS live in game comment welcome 834
- PART DEUX 145
- I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 60,853
- Week 6 Money 8,213
- 🏀😎🥳 NCAA hoops bets hitting over 63% each year for past few seasons!...BUT will this continue? 🤔 ...or regress?? 🤒🤕😧 191,792
- NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 36,199
- NFL LOCKED IN! 105,216
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
