Dear Covers Team
I want to raise a fairness concern regarding the Georgia State vs. Arizona State total posted by the user mollydog, specifically the Under 149.5 selection. That number was not available anywhere in the market at the time indicated by his pick timestamp. Based on archived line movement, 149.5 had been gone for many hours. Given the documented movement across every book, it would have been impossible for any bettor—including mollydog—to legitimately obtain 149.5 at the time his pick was recorded, yet the system still accepted it.
Below is the essential market history across books, showing the actual totals available:
Tooniebet – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:19 ET: o145.5 -108 / u145.5 -118
Mon Nov 17 08:14 ET: o145.5 -114 / u145.5 -112
Mon Nov 17 07:59 ET: o146.5 -112 / u146.5 -114
Mon Nov 17 01:14 ET: o147.5 -113 / u147.5 -113
Sun Nov 16 22:29 ET: o148.5 -114 / u148.5 -112
Sports Interaction – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:49 ET: o143.5 -115 / u143.5 -105
Mon Nov 17 08:39 ET: o143.5 -110 / u143.5 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:34 ET: o144.5 -105 / u144.5 -115
Mon Nov 17 08:29 ET: o144.5 -110 / u144.5 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:19 ET: o144.5 -115 / u144.5 -105
Mon Nov 17 08:04 ET: o145.5 -110 / u145.5 -110
TonyBet – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:41 ET: o144.5 -114 / u144.5 -122
Mon Nov 17 08:31 ET: o144.5 -118 / u144.5 -118
Mon Nov 17 08:11 ET: o145.5 -115 / u145.5 -120
Mon Nov 17 07:56 ET: o146.5 -114 / u146.5 -122
Sun Nov 16 17:26 ET: o149.5 -122 / u149.5 -112
bet365 – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:24 ET: o144.5 -110 / u144.5 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:19 ET: o145.0 -110 / u145.0 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:09 ET: o146.0 -110 / u146.0 -110
Sun Nov 16 17:19 ET: o149.5 -110 / u149.5 -110
Pinnacle – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:21 ET: o143.5 -111 / u143.5 -109
Mon Nov 17 08:11 ET: o143.5 -110 / u143.5 -110
Betano – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:25 ET: o143.5 -110 / u143.5 -111
Mon Nov 17 08:05 ET: o147.5 -110 / u147.5 -111
Sun Nov 16 22:55 ET: o149.5 -110 / u149.5 -111
BET99 – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:33 ET: o145.5 -110 / u145.5 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:27 ET: o143.5 -115 / u143.5 -105
Sun Nov 16 18:42 ET: o149.5 -105 / u149.5 -115
Caesars – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:49 ET: o144.0 -110 / u144.0 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:19 ET: o145.0 -110 / u145.0 -110
Sun Nov 16 19:04 ET: o148.5 -110 / u148.5 -110
BetMGM – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:49 ET: o143.5 -115 / u143.5 -105
Mon Nov 17 08:19 ET: o145.5 -105 / u145.5 -115
Sun Nov 16 19:49 ET: o148.5 -110 / u148.5 -110
BetRivers – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:14 ET: o145.5 -108 / u145.5 -118
Mon Nov 17 07:59 ET: o146.5 -112 / u146.5 -114
Betway – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:32 ET: o144.5 -110 / u144.5 -115
Mon Nov 17 08:12 ET: o145.5 -110 / u145.5 -115
Across all books, 149.5 disappeared late afternoon to early evening on Sun Nov 16. By the time his pick timestamp appears on Covers, every sportsbook was between 143.5 and 146.5. Not a single operator was offering 149.5, and none came close to returning to it. This makes the recorded pick number objectively unobtainable in any real market.
This is not a personal complaint. It is a structural concern: if outdated numbers are selectable, intentionally or not, it creates an unfair environment for everyone else operating on actual, available lines.
I am asking Covers to verify whether line selections are being validated correctly and whether users can still choose numbers after they have moved. Any clarification on how timestamps align with the actual market would help the entire community.
The goal is simple: fairness.
Hot Forum Topics
