I heard that too AFTER I wondered if search teams were incompetent. Even with that being said Equisearch was there doing some searches, I am sure if they followed normal search protocol, they started the search around the grandparents and Mothers houses, and expanded outward.
When children are murdered statistically they are either drown or left in water about 80% ( or more ) of the time. I am sure they searched bodies of water with as much diligence as land.
Question now has to be asked, was body there the whole time? If not, then Mom has an accomplice
Some items were removed from the family home by investigators. Hate to say it, but maybe one of the other family members knows what happened.
0
Quote Originally Posted by FirstAgain:
Thanks
I heard that too AFTER I wondered if search teams were incompetent. Even with that being said Equisearch was there doing some searches, I am sure if they followed normal search protocol, they started the search around the grandparents and Mothers houses, and expanded outward.
When children are murdered statistically they are either drown or left in water about 80% ( or more ) of the time. I am sure they searched bodies of water with as much diligence as land.
Question now has to be asked, was body there the whole time? If not, then Mom has an accomplice
Some items were removed from the family home by investigators. Hate to say it, but maybe one of the other family members knows what happened.
Grandfather was is an ex cop. I have an uneasy feeling you are right.
God help the grandparents if that body wasnt there from day 1.
Casey Anthony had full run of the parents house and could easily have gotten tape, garbage bags, rope etc from mom and dad, but if that little girl was dropped in the water AFTER mom was in custody, I think the grandparent(s) would have been involved.
How heartless would someone be to bound a child, put them in a garbage bag, and throw them into a swamp.
0
Grandfather was is an ex cop. I have an uneasy feeling you are right.
God help the grandparents if that body wasnt there from day 1.
Casey Anthony had full run of the parents house and could easily have gotten tape, garbage bags, rope etc from mom and dad, but if that little girl was dropped in the water AFTER mom was in custody, I think the grandparent(s) would have been involved.
How heartless would someone be to bound a child, put them in a garbage bag, and throw them into a swamp.
They won't fry a young woman like that. I'm sure she's gonna eventually say it was an accident and she got scared so she buried the body.
She'll do serious time but not fry.
You do not put duck tape on the mouth of a dead child. Kevin told us the investigation is over. He is sure it is the little girl. And she had duct tape over her mouth.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Greyhound:
They won't fry a young woman like that. I'm sure she's gonna eventually say it was an accident and she got scared so she buried the body.
She'll do serious time but not fry.
You do not put duck tape on the mouth of a dead child. Kevin told us the investigation is over. He is sure it is the little girl. And she had duct tape over her mouth.
These individual tragedies draw interest, intrigue, and public outrage because they can potentially be "solved" and vengeance can be served.
The global issues you mention have no readily available solution, so most would rather ignore them than admit the challenge associated with addressing them.
Yes there is a very simple solution. If every country in the "developed world" gave even 1% of the money they spend on weapons contracts, or any number of other programs, they could feed every single starving person in the world and treat there medical issues. Perhaps if so mmuch time wasn't spent on these kinds of relatively unimportant "news" stories, more people would know this and we could actually get something done. Please don't tell me there is no readily available solution.
News = entertainment.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Dsn150:
These individual tragedies draw interest, intrigue, and public outrage because they can potentially be "solved" and vengeance can be served.
The global issues you mention have no readily available solution, so most would rather ignore them than admit the challenge associated with addressing them.
Yes there is a very simple solution. If every country in the "developed world" gave even 1% of the money they spend on weapons contracts, or any number of other programs, they could feed every single starving person in the world and treat there medical issues. Perhaps if so mmuch time wasn't spent on these kinds of relatively unimportant "news" stories, more people would know this and we could actually get something done. Please don't tell me there is no readily available solution.
Yes there is a very simple solution. If every country in the "developed world" gave even 1% of the money they spend on weapons contracts, or any number of other programs, they could feed every single starving person in the world and treat there medical issues. Perhaps if so mmuch time wasn't spent on these kinds of relatively unimportant "news" stories, more people would know this and we could actually get something done. Please don't tell me there is no readily available solution.
News = entertainment.
Sending increasing sums of money into third world / underdeveloped countries will not solve their problems- Most, if not all, of their governments are thieving corrupt regimes, so the money will never get to it's intended cause.
I have spent a bit of time doing medical mission trips in a couple of these areas ( Peru and Cameroon to be specific ) and it did not appear that more money would be the ultimate answer.
Until there is a change in the mindset of the governments and people allowing for social safety nets to protect the masses of poor, uneducated population, there will continue to be famine, inadequate / nonexistent medical care, and oppression by the few wealthy in their countries- Peru is a bit farther ahead in this respect, but still has far to go.
There are not enough medical personnel in the world to address the plethora of needs- an intensive training and placement program ( with little or no incentive to join at present ) would be required- not feasible at present.
Feeding the world- a common humanitarian goal- only propagates the overpopulation problems that already exist- there is inadequate "housing" and sanitation infrastructure as it is. It seems that comprehensive education and birth control programs ( widely rejected in developing countries ) might be a start.
Another issue that I encountered, particularly in Africa, was a skepticism and almost outright rejection of western medical practice ( some might argue on occasion justified ). This would be a huge obstacle- not insurmountable, but significant.
I do think these are areas worth exploring, but hardly a simple solution.
0
Quote Originally Posted by IronCobra:
Yes there is a very simple solution. If every country in the "developed world" gave even 1% of the money they spend on weapons contracts, or any number of other programs, they could feed every single starving person in the world and treat there medical issues. Perhaps if so mmuch time wasn't spent on these kinds of relatively unimportant "news" stories, more people would know this and we could actually get something done. Please don't tell me there is no readily available solution.
News = entertainment.
Sending increasing sums of money into third world / underdeveloped countries will not solve their problems- Most, if not all, of their governments are thieving corrupt regimes, so the money will never get to it's intended cause.
I have spent a bit of time doing medical mission trips in a couple of these areas ( Peru and Cameroon to be specific ) and it did not appear that more money would be the ultimate answer.
Until there is a change in the mindset of the governments and people allowing for social safety nets to protect the masses of poor, uneducated population, there will continue to be famine, inadequate / nonexistent medical care, and oppression by the few wealthy in their countries- Peru is a bit farther ahead in this respect, but still has far to go.
There are not enough medical personnel in the world to address the plethora of needs- an intensive training and placement program ( with little or no incentive to join at present ) would be required- not feasible at present.
Feeding the world- a common humanitarian goal- only propagates the overpopulation problems that already exist- there is inadequate "housing" and sanitation infrastructure as it is. It seems that comprehensive education and birth control programs ( widely rejected in developing countries ) might be a start.
Another issue that I encountered, particularly in Africa, was a skepticism and almost outright rejection of western medical practice ( some might argue on occasion justified ). This would be a huge obstacle- not insurmountable, but significant.
I do think these are areas worth exploring, but hardly a simple solution.
Hot Forum Topics
