Posted:
#1
Boycotting covers until they bring old consensus back!
Views: 938
Posts: 9
Posted:
#4
Quote Originally Posted by KingScorpio:
You're a spoiled loser with no clue in life.
Boycotting a free site
You're a spoiled loser with no clue in life.
looks like your you have no clue in life. Your like 50 participating on a gambling forum and dont know what boycott means. Get a life dude! the only reason i used this site was for consensus data and history. unlike you to talk sh**t on a forum! like i said before Get A Life
Quote Originally Posted by KingScorpio:
You're a spoiled loser with no clue in life.
Boycotting a free site
You're a spoiled loser with no clue in life.
looks like your you have no clue in life. Your like 50 participating on a gambling forum and dont know what boycott means. Get a life dude! the only reason i used this site was for consensus data and history. unlike you to talk sh**t on a forum! like i said before Get A Life
Posted:
#6
Hello users,
Any specific feedback or suggestion for changes can be made within our Official Thread. We are working diligently to resurrect any old functionalities missing from the new consensus, as well as incorporating many of your new suggestions.
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/POST01/showmessage.aspx?spt=17&sub=102190572
Regards,
Covers-Team
Winning Starts Here
Hello users,
Any specific feedback or suggestion for changes can be made within our Official Thread. We are working diligently to resurrect any old functionalities missing from the new consensus, as well as incorporating many of your new suggestions.
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/POST01/showmessage.aspx?spt=17&sub=102190572
Regards,
Covers-Team
Posted:
#7
I'm not boycotting the site I just don't like the consensus format either 11-19-2015 there are games today on NHL so checked the consensus on those games it only showed games picked >59% the details is good but it should on the same line like it use to be so we can see everything!! at one time, it shouldn't matter if they are below 59% we still understand what we see I just want to see the numbers how many players picked that game Over/Under as well. I don't care for away/home teams greater than 59% the old way was much much better.
don't give us the run around on were looking into trying fix it, you changed you can fix it PRONTO!!
don't give us the run around on were looking into trying fix it, you changed you can fix it PRONTO!!
I'm not boycotting the site I just don't like the consensus format either 11-19-2015 there are games today on NHL so checked the consensus on those games it only showed games picked >59% the details is good but it should on the same line like it use to be so we can see everything!! at one time, it shouldn't matter if they are below 59% we still understand what we see I just want to see the numbers how many players picked that game Over/Under as well. I don't care for away/home teams greater than 59% the old way was much much better.
don't give us the run around on were looking into trying fix it, you changed you can fix it PRONTO!!
don't give us the run around on were looking into trying fix it, you changed you can fix it PRONTO!!
Posted:
#9
Quote Originally Posted by Covers-Team:
Hello users,
I don't believe it! an actual reaction to reality...CT you simply made a very costly decision in the adaption of a new look 'consensus' format that does not conform, swallow your mistake and do as you say "resurrect any old functionalities" I am sure your effort will be benificial, and widely appreciated..thank you for finally coming forward with a positive responseHello users,
Any specific feedback or suggestion for changes can be made within our Official Thread. We are working diligently to resurrect any old functionalities missing from the new consensus, as well as incorporating many of your new suggestions.
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/POST01/showmessage.aspx?spt=17&sub=102190572
Regards,
Covers-Team
Quote Originally Posted by Covers-Team:
Hello users,
I don't believe it! an actual reaction to reality...CT you simply made a very costly decision in the adaption of a new look 'consensus' format that does not conform, swallow your mistake and do as you say "resurrect any old functionalities" I am sure your effort will be benificial, and widely appreciated..thank you for finally coming forward with a positive responseHello users,
Any specific feedback or suggestion for changes can be made within our Official Thread. We are working diligently to resurrect any old functionalities missing from the new consensus, as well as incorporating many of your new suggestions.
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/POST01/showmessage.aspx?spt=17&sub=102190572
Regards,
Covers-Team
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 460,355
- Thursday 10/08/2026 436
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 269,894
- PART DEUX 157
- TB/BOYS live in game comment welcome 847
- Week 6 Money 8,478
- I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 60,854
- 🏀😎🥳 NCAA hoops bets hitting over 63% each year for past few seasons!...BUT will this continue? 🤔 ...or regress?? 🤒🤕😧 191,793
- NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 36,271
- NFL LOCKED IN! 105,262
Warning - External Link
Report User
Thank you for reporting
This content is abusive or harmful
This post is spam
An error has occurred
This post is spam
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
Delete Post
Are you sure you would like to remove this post?
Remove Thread
Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?
Scan Results
Login/Register
Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search

Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.