betED deal example... Good or bad?

This whole situation has been very frustrating to me because I've been getting regularly tortured by people reading other sources and then coming back here and complaining that so-and-so apparently made betED a great offer and they turned it down. Therefore, the theory goes, betED must be in it for themselves.

Maybe instead of Yes or No, you can vote GOOD or BAD. 

Is BetEd really in a position here Freedom to be rejecting offers that even you yourself note would be a "great" deal for them in the other thread Freedom? I mean I don't want to seem callous, but why should I believe that BetEd has the best interests of their customers in mind  in terms of negotiating a "buyout deal" when, prior to the seizure of funds, they weren't even doing enough safekeeping to ensure that player funds were protected if something like what happened to the poker sites happened to them?

I Want to Know What Book made that Offer ??

NO SHOT was that the offer !
Looks NOTHING like it

??? I've been Playing there since it was Bestlines 12+ Years
Where they going ??

Where did the "GHOST" Go ??

The breakdown I "Heard" was where they would do it month by month
10% of your balance, for 10 months or something alone those lines.
1X rollover
or Match the balance with a Deposit and rollover 10X
and you can get your money out anytime after that 10X rollover

I don't know about that other stuff, but I ONLY care about the rollover detail's

kapono, you don't have to believe anything or trust anything.

Freedom,, stop wasting your time.   U have no reputation, reliablity, and purpose here.

Freedom -- oh, I agree, I don't have to believe or trust anything. But isn't it kind of difficult to evaluate if its an acceptable deal for the players in a vacuum? I mean from what I read, it seems like you are saying that they rejected the deal from whatever the initial source was that you outlined because there were other deals on the table that they thought were better/more in the players' interests. If that's the case, how can players tell whether or not this deal described above is a good one? I mean its the only one they know about at this point, and when faced with taking that or taking nothing, I could see how a lot of people would want whatever sort of remedy they could find, you know?

and Why would ANYONE in their Right mind give Cash up front ???
and Who are They(Beted ) to ask for money Up front ?

There is absolutely NO SHOT that beted turned down a deal because it was bad for their players.  If thats the case, tell the Easter Bunny i said hello. 

I just got a call from Santa claus, the Easter bunny is with him.

So what exactly is going to happen beted is going to be back and they want people to deposit with them again???  I dont get exactly what they are trying to debate.  Beted needs to gain trust among its players again if they ever want to have players play there again.

You know what's funny? 

gamble, no, whoever they make the deal with will take over the players.

fuck, at this point, any deal is good. i mean anything. pretty much.

Freedom -- how can you tell if it is a GOOD or BAD deal for the players in a vacuum? We have these assurances from you that there are other offers on the table that BetEd is evaluating. How can you expect people to have an opinion on whether or not this is a GOOD or BAD deal if they don't know the terms of the other deals on the table that are supposedly better for the players?

Does that make sense at all?

Freedom, how about you list all other offers beted received and let us vote on those too???

At this point any deal is a good deal.  If my money has to be locked up till footbal season, so be it. 

Not sure why you Won't answer this ????

are you saying this above offer was Never out there ?
it's looks like a better Deal than what you posted

I don't have a dog in the fight, but what's the big deal about a 90 day lockdown of the players......and when football starts 90% of the players will keep playing......I know....I know that's the whole idea.  They know most of the players will keep the money in for the season. Well, maybe just be college football, but it's football.

 You wait 90 days if you really want your money back or say

Not get a damn penny at all.

Huge thumbs down to BetEd.  Who the hell do they think they are to be judge of peoples money.  They can get the players back in the game and get something in thier pocket.

Good deal for the players.

Agree...and at this point any deal is a good deal for the players.  Whether it be the 90 day hold deal or the 10% at a time deal from betonline. 

In all of this uncertainty, the only thing im certain of is that beted is not approving or turning down deals based on what is good for the player. 

My vote then is GOOD.  What type of compensation though if any will they give to all of us to get trust back with them and not just withdraw after 90 days and put all our funds though in betjamaica where we know we are safe.