We dont remove threads because someone disagrees with your premise and has a different opinion.
If you are seeking to only have replies agreeing with you and nothing else, I think this site is going to be too difficult for you to handle.
I read much of that thread and the parts you dont like were people testing your approach and having some critical comments about it working or not.
For sure we will not remove that thread.
Your statement "I read much of that thread and the parts you dont like were people testing your approach and having some critical comments about it working or not." shows you didn't read the post ANY AT ALL. No one was questioning if it works or not. How can you questions someone who has gotten 10-1-1 from 12 plays posted in Week 5? huh? A matter a fact someone who post all plays from Thursday??? You showing up yourself with the statement.
I requested the post be removed because no one is will offer a suitable long solution. It works and works well. Dd you even look at the post? I'm pretty sure you didn't. Everyone is complain about this is not going to working in the long run. ITS NOT ABOUT IT NOT WORKING NOW but none of them is willing provide a solution. You consider 51-17-2 not working? haha.
I shared the idea because i was hoping persons on here could provide expertise in helping me to improve it but i was wrong.
Everyone wants to grab.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
We dont remove threads because someone disagrees with your premise and has a different opinion.
If you are seeking to only have replies agreeing with you and nothing else, I think this site is going to be too difficult for you to handle.
I read much of that thread and the parts you dont like were people testing your approach and having some critical comments about it working or not.
For sure we will not remove that thread.
Your statement "I read much of that thread and the parts you dont like were people testing your approach and having some critical comments about it working or not." shows you didn't read the post ANY AT ALL. No one was questioning if it works or not. How can you questions someone who has gotten 10-1-1 from 12 plays posted in Week 5? huh? A matter a fact someone who post all plays from Thursday??? You showing up yourself with the statement.
I requested the post be removed because no one is will offer a suitable long solution. It works and works well. Dd you even look at the post? I'm pretty sure you didn't. Everyone is complain about this is not going to working in the long run. ITS NOT ABOUT IT NOT WORKING NOW but none of them is willing provide a solution. You consider 51-17-2 not working? haha.
I shared the idea because i was hoping persons on here could provide expertise in helping me to improve it but i was wrong.
Someone questioning your results and backtesting the data is not negativity or bashing.
You really need to be able to post with others who might not agree with you if you are going to last very long here.
Its ok for someone to review what you are suggesting and have a differing opinion, especially when they actually put time into reviewing it and researching.
Relax...
0
Someone questioning your results and backtesting the data is not negativity or bashing.
You really need to be able to post with others who might not agree with you if you are going to last very long here.
Its ok for someone to review what you are suggesting and have a differing opinion, especially when they actually put time into reviewing it and researching.
That's really disappointing PointsRator. You have a chance to be great with it. There were many responses, including myself trying to fully grasp the system before posting into the thread.
People were challenging how the system worked and it would work for the long haul, not the current effectiveness. As you stated 10-1-1 is unprecedented.
Some people on here are downright cruel but the majority want to help each other.
I think yanking that thread was a little premature.
0
That's really disappointing PointsRator. You have a chance to be great with it. There were many responses, including myself trying to fully grasp the system before posting into the thread.
People were challenging how the system worked and it would work for the long haul, not the current effectiveness. As you stated 10-1-1 is unprecedented.
Some people on here are downright cruel but the majority want to help each other.
I think yanking that thread was a little premature.
Someone questioning your results and backtesting the data is not negativity or bashing.
You really need to be able to post with others who might not agree with you if you are going to last very long here.
Its ok for someone to review what you are suggesting and have a differing opinion, especially when they actually put time into reviewing it and researching.
Relax...
Well, since you're not removing it then. You might as well make it visible n the NFL betting forum so those who claim they are "willing to contribute" will post on it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Someone questioning your results and backtesting the data is not negativity or bashing.
You really need to be able to post with others who might not agree with you if you are going to last very long here.
Its ok for someone to review what you are suggesting and have a differing opinion, especially when they actually put time into reviewing it and researching.
Relax...
Well, since you're not removing it then. You might as well make it visible n the NFL betting forum so those who claim they are "willing to contribute" will post on it.