probably it was not a score but the thing here is that the call on the field was touchdown...
so it has to be a touchdown
I honestly think it was not a catch... but with the TV replay rules... then they should have declared a touchdown because it wasn´t any indisputable evidence to overturned it..
nevertheless Im so happy...
I honestly think it was not a catch... but with the TV replay rules... then they should have declared a touchdown because it wasn´t any indisputable evidence to overturned it..
nevertheless Im so happy...
I agree 100%, well said.
I agree 100%, well said.
I agree that it was a catch. Not only a catch, but a spectacular catch.
incredible the way he laid out and cradled the ball .
i actually had Michigan (also had the over) and when I saw it real time, I thought, no way that was a catch. whenthe ref indicated TD, I thought the ref was giving himn a borderline decision.
Then , when I saw the replay, it looked clearly like a catch. his elbow obviously comes down in time and the ball never seemed to rattle around. i did see the ball drag the ground and that might have been where the final decision came from. i never saw any lack of control. As I said,, the ball dragged a little and it seemd like his hands were around and under the ball. BUT, the ball did touch the ground .
I agree that it was a catch. Not only a catch, but a spectacular catch.
incredible the way he laid out and cradled the ball .
i actually had Michigan (also had the over) and when I saw it real time, I thought, no way that was a catch. whenthe ref indicated TD, I thought the ref was giving himn a borderline decision.
Then , when I saw the replay, it looked clearly like a catch. his elbow obviously comes down in time and the ball never seemed to rattle around. i did see the ball drag the ground and that might have been where the final decision came from. i never saw any lack of control. As I said,, the ball dragged a little and it seemd like his hands were around and under the ball. BUT, the ball did touch the ground .
I agree that it was a catch. Not only a catch, but a spectacular catch.
incredible the way he laid out and cradled the ball .
i actually had Michigan (also had the over) and when I saw it real time, I thought, no way that was a catch. whenthe ref indicated TD, I thought the ref was giving himn a borderline decision.
Then , when I saw the replay, it looked clearly like a catch. his elbow obviously comes down in time and the ball never seemed to rattle around. i did see the ball drag the ground and that might have been where the final decision came from. i never saw any lack of control. As I said,, the ball dragged a little and it seemd like his hands were around and under the ball. BUT, the ball did touch the ground .
I agree that it was a catch. Not only a catch, but a spectacular catch.
incredible the way he laid out and cradled the ball .
i actually had Michigan (also had the over) and when I saw it real time, I thought, no way that was a catch. whenthe ref indicated TD, I thought the ref was giving himn a borderline decision.
Then , when I saw the replay, it looked clearly like a catch. his elbow obviously comes down in time and the ball never seemed to rattle around. i did see the ball drag the ground and that might have been where the final decision came from. i never saw any lack of control. As I said,, the ball dragged a little and it seemd like his hands were around and under the ball. BUT, the ball did touch the ground .
i had michigan ML and i can say to me it was without a doubt a td i thought he was out of bounds but the elbow was down first in the endzone and they said he didnt have controll of the ball? BS
blown call sorry to all those that lost
i had michigan ML and i can say to me it was without a doubt a td i thought he was out of bounds but the elbow was down first in the endzone and they said he didnt have controll of the ball? BS
blown call sorry to all those that lost

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.