Posted:
#401
Well done this week UNC!!!!!! rough sunday! Hey what are you going to do? I had a great week!!! Thanks for everything
0
The Road to Indy
Posted:
#402
Quote Originally Posted by JGB3:
One glaring difference between these two clubs is their turnover efficiency on the defensive end of the floor. Kansas St. ranks 7th best in the country in causing turnovers while Xavier ranks 7th worst in that category. Believe in the power of the turnover ! When you have it more than the other guy your chances of winning go way up. Xavier is in a tough spot here !
You said it an 18-19 year old freshman PG turns it over...a senior PG doesn't especially one with the pose of Clemente....the statistics tell the tail.
Pitt shot 39% and still had to chances to tie the game in the dying seconds....thats all I need to see.
0
Posted:
#403
[Quote: Originally Posted by Mud]
You said it an 18-19 year old freshman PG turns it over...a senior PG doesn't especially one with the pose of Clemente....the statistics tell the tail.
Pitt shot 39% and still had to chances to tie the game in the dying seconds....thats all I need to see.
Holloway and Clemente have the exact same assist to turnover ratio. I was merely pointing out that the factors you said simply do not have an impact on the game imo. Never said I was on xavier no matter what. and holloway is a sophmore not a freshman. I dont really like to get into a discussion like this in someone elses thread, i started one myself.
0
Posted:
#407
Oh, I see you like the Vols this week...
Bout time A-hole! We are not the weak ass SEC like you say...we just care about the only real sport in the south...pigskin!
Good job so far brotha...I'm sure you'll rape the man the rest of the way if you keep betting on the orange and white !
Oh yeah, I gotta new cell phone number so if you get a call or text from a Georgia number its me!
0
Posted:
#408
The key to attacking Cuse's zone is whether or not Butler puts Hayward in the middle of it or Howard. I would imagine they put Hayward in there.
One of the biggest myths in basketball is that the 2-3 zone is killed by good three-point shooting teams. Sure, it helps to have good shooters around the zone, but the biggest part is getting someone in the middle of it (free throw line) who can do three things with the ball - pass, drive and shoot. If they get Hayward in there, he can do all three.
One of the biggest myths in basketball is that the 2-3 zone is killed by good three-point shooting teams. Sure, it helps to have good shooters around the zone, but the biggest part is getting someone in the middle of it (free throw line) who can do three things with the ball - pass, drive and shoot. If they get Hayward in there, he can do all three.
0
Posted:
#410
Quote Originally Posted by TRoe15:
The key to attacking Cuse's zone is whether or not Butler puts Hayward in the middle of it or Howard. I would imagine they put Hayward in there.
One of the biggest myths in basketball is that the 2-3 zone is killed by good three-point shooting teams. Sure, it helps to have good shooters around the zone, but the biggest part is getting someone in the middle of it (free throw line) who can do three things with the ball - pass, drive and shoot. If they get Hayward in there, he can do all three.
The key to attacking Cuse's zone is whether or not Butler puts Hayward in the middle of it or Howard. I would imagine they put Hayward in there.
One of the biggest myths in basketball is that the 2-3 zone is killed by good three-point shooting teams. Sure, it helps to have good shooters around the zone, but the biggest part is getting someone in the middle of it (free throw line) who can do three things with the ball - pass, drive and shoot. If they get Hayward in there, he can do all three.
The good shooters create the entry point that you speak of. If you don't pull the Syrcuse guards outside the arc there isn't enough space to drop the ball in. Therefore no makey your tres no breakey the zone !
0
Posted:
#411
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:
Looking at
CORNELL
WASH
BUTLER -Surprisingly this will be CUSE toughest game. BUTLER presents a lot of match-up problems here...
XAV
MICH ST
TENN
BAY
PURDUE
I really think Cuse handles them here, along with KState. Id love to hear ur thoughts on these games before locking them in. I Think Butler is really outmanned here and would love to hear a more in depth opinion as to why you lean butler. Thanks buddy and BOL
0
Posted:
#417
Quote Originally Posted by tony_come:
Yah b/c Matt Howard is going to dominate vs Rick Jackson, Riley and Wes Johnson..... I agreed with the butler game as being a matchup problem for cuse. Butler inside game will create problems more so than the perimeters.
BOL
sometimes I think you people just like to hear yourself talk. I will be on butler +6.5 not b/c of their post play but their guard play. Nored, Mack and Hayward is where the mismatch is!
0
Posted:
#419
Quote Originally Posted by AlexEnglish:
Genious
yeah i didn't know that the unwritten rule here is that if you post an opinion about a game it implies you are challenging the thread owners capping or trying to be a genious (whatever a genious is)
then again, i didn't lay my tourney bankroll on Wake vs. KY.
0
Posted:
#424
UNC...much respect here and I am not hating just confused.
First of all, he has 100k views because he is using one thread for 3 weeks worth of picks.
Secondly, all you read in here is BOL and GL, he has not posted anything in a while. Let's see the picks first before everyone kisses his ass.
First of all, he has 100k views because he is using one thread for 3 weeks worth of picks.
Secondly, all you read in here is BOL and GL, he has not posted anything in a while. Let's see the picks first before everyone kisses his ass.
0
Posted:
#425
Quote Originally Posted by cburk:
UNC...much respect here and I am not hating just confused.
First of all, he has 100k views because he is using one thread for 3 weeks worth of picks.
Secondly, all you read in here is BOL and GL, he has not posted anything in a while. Let's see the picks first before everyone kisses his ass.
UNC...much respect here and I am not hating just confused.
First of all, he has 100k views because he is using one thread for 3 weeks worth of picks.
Secondly, all you read in here is BOL and GL, he has not posted anything in a while. Let's see the picks first before everyone kisses his ass.
Why post this? People respect his picks. Period - end of story.
0
Hot Forum Topics
