
EXACTLY!!
What all the jabronis don't understand is that an excellent capper will pick around 60% ATS over the course of 100 picks and 65% is extremely lucky. Last year, Kindergartencappers's record on totals was 186-103, a percentage of 63.3%. Now what that means is for every 100 picks, there will be 37 LOSERS. There will be streaks of 3,4,5,6 losers. Yes it is possible.
IF you are tailing a capper, then you need to tail everyone of his picks for the exact same amount. If you vary the unit size, you will invariably bet bigger on the losers and smaller on the winners.
The problem with tailing any particular poster on this site is that everyone has erratic positing times, so you often miss the posts. Then you come up later and see that he had a great day, so by the nature of human psyhcology, you intently wait for the next post, which, by law of averages, will tend to be a loser. This is why you should not tail anyone sporadically, you will tend to get more of their losers. You have to tail everyone of their picks, but the nature of erratic posting times (not just KindergartenCapper) makes this impossible unless you are a degenerate with no life.
KindergartenCapper, keep up the good work, thanks for your posts, ignore the uninteligible idiots.
EXACTLY!!
What all the jabronis don't understand is that an excellent capper will pick around 60% ATS over the course of 100 picks and 65% is extremely lucky. Last year, Kindergartencappers's record on totals was 186-103, a percentage of 63.3%. Now what that means is for every 100 picks, there will be 37 LOSERS. There will be streaks of 3,4,5,6 losers. Yes it is possible.
IF you are tailing a capper, then you need to tail everyone of his picks for the exact same amount. If you vary the unit size, you will invariably bet bigger on the losers and smaller on the winners.
The problem with tailing any particular poster on this site is that everyone has erratic positing times, so you often miss the posts. Then you come up later and see that he had a great day, so by the nature of human psyhcology, you intently wait for the next post, which, by law of averages, will tend to be a loser. This is why you should not tail anyone sporadically, you will tend to get more of their losers. You have to tail everyone of their picks, but the nature of erratic posting times (not just KindergartenCapper) makes this impossible unless you are a degenerate with no life.
KindergartenCapper, keep up the good work, thanks for your posts, ignore the uninteligible idiots.
EXACTLY!!
What all the jabronis don't understand is that an excellent capper will pick around 60% ATS over the course of 100 picks and 65% is extremely lucky. Last year, Kindergartencappers's record on totals was 186-103, a percentage of 63.3%. Now what that means is for every 100 picks, there will be 37 LOSERS. There will be streaks of 3,4,5,6 losers. Yes it is possible.
IF you are tailing a capper, then you need to tail everyone of his picks for the exact same amount. If you vary the unit size, you will invariably bet bigger on the losers and smaller on the winners.
The problem with tailing any particular poster on this site is that everyone has erratic positing times, so you often miss the posts. Then you come up later and see that he had a great day, so by the nature of human psyhcology, you intently wait for the next post, which, by law of averages, will tend to be a loser. This is why you should not tail anyone sporadically, you will tend to get more of their losers. You have to tail everyone of their picks, but the nature of erratic posting times (not just KindergartenCapper) makes this impossible unless you are a degenerate with no life.
KindergartenCapper, keep up the good work, thanks for your posts, ignore the uninteligible idiots.
EXACTLY!!
What all the jabronis don't understand is that an excellent capper will pick around 60% ATS over the course of 100 picks and 65% is extremely lucky. Last year, Kindergartencappers's record on totals was 186-103, a percentage of 63.3%. Now what that means is for every 100 picks, there will be 37 LOSERS. There will be streaks of 3,4,5,6 losers. Yes it is possible.
IF you are tailing a capper, then you need to tail everyone of his picks for the exact same amount. If you vary the unit size, you will invariably bet bigger on the losers and smaller on the winners.
The problem with tailing any particular poster on this site is that everyone has erratic positing times, so you often miss the posts. Then you come up later and see that he had a great day, so by the nature of human psyhcology, you intently wait for the next post, which, by law of averages, will tend to be a loser. This is why you should not tail anyone sporadically, you will tend to get more of their losers. You have to tail everyone of their picks, but the nature of erratic posting times (not just KindergartenCapper) makes this impossible unless you are a degenerate with no life.
KindergartenCapper, keep up the good work, thanks for your posts, ignore the uninteligible idiots.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.