Valparaiso has won 5 in a row against Detroit and now Valparaiso only has to win the game by one bucket.
Detroit +2
GL ![]()
Valparaiso has won 5 in a row against Detroit and now Valparaiso only has to win the game by one bucket.
Detroit +2
GL ![]()
Valparaiso has won 5 in a row against Detroit and now Valparaiso only has to win the game by one bucket.
Detroit +2
GL ![]()
It stunk like Detroit @ Valpo Feb 2nd when valpo was only 2.5 at home again, and the final was 78-73 valpo
OR
When the game was @ Detroit and Detroit was -5 and Valpo won 73-71.
You guys crack me up, the line was right where it shoulda been.
It stunk like Detroit @ Valpo Feb 2nd when valpo was only 2.5 at home again, and the final was 78-73 valpo
OR
When the game was @ Detroit and Detroit was -5 and Valpo won 73-71.
You guys crack me up, the line was right where it shoulda been.
It stunk like Detroit @ Valpo Feb 2nd when valpo was only 2.5 at home again, and the final was 78-73 valpo
OR
When the game was @ Detroit and Detroit was -5 and Valpo won 73-71.
You guys crack me up, the line was right where it shoulda been.
It stunk like Detroit @ Valpo Feb 2nd when valpo was only 2.5 at home again, and the final was 78-73 valpo
OR
When the game was @ Detroit and Detroit was -5 and Valpo won 73-71.
You guys crack me up, the line was right where it shoulda been.
![]()
Have you known vegas to change their minds in a series of 2 months? I dont, the line wasnt fucking fishy and god damn valpo ruined my life![]()
![]()
![]()
Have you known vegas to change their minds in a series of 2 months? I dont, the line wasnt fucking fishy and god damn valpo ruined my life![]()
![]()
the line was just what it was supposed to be. Valpo was winning by 9 early, van wijk got hurt, he was never the same, and detroit caught fire.
Yes I think the line was not fishy and was right where it was supposed to be.
Is anyone out there besides this moron give a opinion?
Detroit was 5 point faves at detroit
Valpo was 2.5 faves at valpo
Valpo 2 point faves in this game, is that fishy?
Obviously Vegas thought more of Dwetroit all year long than they did Valpo, what did you expect them to make the line?
the line was just what it was supposed to be. Valpo was winning by 9 early, van wijk got hurt, he was never the same, and detroit caught fire.
Yes I think the line was not fishy and was right where it was supposed to be.
Is anyone out there besides this moron give a opinion?
Detroit was 5 point faves at detroit
Valpo was 2.5 faves at valpo
Valpo 2 point faves in this game, is that fishy?
Obviously Vegas thought more of Dwetroit all year long than they did Valpo, what did you expect them to make the line?
the line was just what it was supposed to be. Valpo was winning by 9 early, van wijk got hurt, he was never the same, and detroit caught fire.
Yes I think the line was not fishy and was right where it was supposed to be.
Is anyone out there besides this moron give a opinion?
Detroit was 5 point faves at detroit
Valpo was 2.5 faves at valpo
Valpo 2 point faves in this game, is that fishy?
Obviously Vegas thought more of Dwetroit all year long than they did Valpo, what did you expect them to make the line?
the line was just what it was supposed to be. Valpo was winning by 9 early, van wijk got hurt, he was never the same, and detroit caught fire.
Yes I think the line was not fishy and was right where it was supposed to be.
Is anyone out there besides this moron give a opinion?
Detroit was 5 point faves at detroit
Valpo was 2.5 faves at valpo
Valpo 2 point faves in this game, is that fishy?
Obviously Vegas thought more of Dwetroit all year long than they did Valpo, what did you expect them to make the line?
so I guess the f ishy line was 1-2 on the season.
![]()
Help yourself u dumb fuck. And dont ever talk to S.Mouse like that
so I guess the f ishy line was 1-2 on the season.
![]()
Help yourself u dumb fuck. And dont ever talk to S.Mouse like that

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.