180-149 25-5 Big Plays Robert Morris PICK FH Think this game started as GB -1.5 RM stats listed first FG% 46-44 FT% 64-69 3P% 34-30 RPG 40-34 APG 17-13 TPG 13-10 SPG 7-4 RM shoots the ball slightly better I believe RM controls the glass in this one RM 3rd best rebounder is better then GB best rebounder RM top 4 rebounders average 9,7,5,4 GB top rebounders average 5,4,4 RM assist to turnover is better RM is 1-3 on the road but those 3 losses r to way better teams then GB and took 2 of those teams to ot, those loses r: Drake (6-3) in OT St Bonny (8-1) by 14 points Monmouth (5-4) in ot
Correction they beat drake in ot
they lost to iowa , st bonny and monmouth on the road
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ktmike:
180-149 25-5 Big Plays Robert Morris PICK FH Think this game started as GB -1.5 RM stats listed first FG% 46-44 FT% 64-69 3P% 34-30 RPG 40-34 APG 17-13 TPG 13-10 SPG 7-4 RM shoots the ball slightly better I believe RM controls the glass in this one RM 3rd best rebounder is better then GB best rebounder RM top 4 rebounders average 9,7,5,4 GB top rebounders average 5,4,4 RM assist to turnover is better RM is 1-3 on the road but those 3 losses r to way better teams then GB and took 2 of those teams to ot, those loses r: Drake (6-3) in OT St Bonny (8-1) by 14 points Monmouth (5-4) in ot
Correction they beat drake in ot
they lost to iowa , st bonny and monmouth on the road
I agree! Race to 10 parlays have very low variance and eliminate luck from the equation because the teams that win always get to 10 first. Sound logic parlaying this idea! Best of luck brother!
0
@Ktmike
I agree! Race to 10 parlays have very low variance and eliminate luck from the equation because the teams that win always get to 10 first. Sound logic parlaying this idea! Best of luck brother!
Rider +5 FH Not sure how Ryder is -9.5 FG dog here, everything i am looking at says they prolly should win this game Unless Ryder has some injuries i dont know about Ryder number listed first: FG% 35-37 3P% 24-29 FT% 74-76 RPG 40-28 APG 8-11 SPG 6-7 TOG 15-11 Numbers r pretty close across the board but Rider holds a significant edge in rebounding Best 3 for RM r 8,4,4 RPG Best for Merrimack is 4 RPG Riders has played a pretty brutal schedule early on, they r 1-5 but 4 of those loses come to big programs such as : Virgina Houston Texas Rutgers They did lose to Coppin St but was up 13 at one point and only shot 30% fg 28% 3p that game I will just chaulk that up as just a bad game You could argue that Riders numbers would be way better if the competition was the same I will gladly take +5 FH and +9.5 for u FG guys even some sprinkle on the ML I could be wrong and Merrimack win by 20
Turnovers is what kept Rider from winning by double digits, but that was my 1 concern with them. even then -9.5 was way to many points
Rider lead 41-19 in rebounds
not sure i seen that big of a difference in a long time
But Merrimack had 23 points off turnovers
MM had 11 fast break points to only 2 by rider
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ktmike:
Rider +5 FH Not sure how Ryder is -9.5 FG dog here, everything i am looking at says they prolly should win this game Unless Ryder has some injuries i dont know about Ryder number listed first: FG% 35-37 3P% 24-29 FT% 74-76 RPG 40-28 APG 8-11 SPG 6-7 TOG 15-11 Numbers r pretty close across the board but Rider holds a significant edge in rebounding Best 3 for RM r 8,4,4 RPG Best for Merrimack is 4 RPG Riders has played a pretty brutal schedule early on, they r 1-5 but 4 of those loses come to big programs such as : Virgina Houston Texas Rutgers They did lose to Coppin St but was up 13 at one point and only shot 30% fg 28% 3p that game I will just chaulk that up as just a bad game You could argue that Riders numbers would be way better if the competition was the same I will gladly take +5 FH and +9.5 for u FG guys even some sprinkle on the ML I could be wrong and Merrimack win by 20
Turnovers is what kept Rider from winning by double digits, but that was my 1 concern with them. even then -9.5 was way to many points
Rider lead 41-19 in rebounds
not sure i seen that big of a difference in a long time
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.