• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NBA Opening Night
      NBA Opening Night
      • NBA Odds
      • NBA Picks
      • Thunder-Spurs Picks
      • NBA Prediction Markets
      • NBA Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Boxing

    Weekend Picks (9/12-9/13)

    12 Next Last»
    A2C
    19ecoboy79
    SportsFan8890
    Coweringbeef
    Zumbize
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 919
    Posts: 28
    12 Next Last»
     
    A2C
    A2C
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 5053
    Posted: Sep. 10, 2008 - 2:30 PM ET #1

    2007: +12.45 units
    2008: +17.285 units

    Sergio Mora vs. Vernon Forrest
    Mora (+110) (Sportsbook)
    1 unit


    It's not the most exciting matchup, but a Mora play presents a good money-making opportunity.  Forrest is past his prime, and he was consistently beat to the punch in the first matchup with Mora a few months ago.  Forrest seemed to be having a career resurgence when he won a wide decision against Carlos Baldomir in July 2007, but that may have been a bit of a mirage as Baldomir proved to be a shot fighter when he lost to Saul Roman later in the year.  Prior to the Baldomir fight, Forrest won a very controversial decision over a faded Ike Quartey.  I see Forrest as being at the end of his rope, and there's no reason to think that his performance against Mora was just an "off night."  Instead, I expect Mora to have greater confidence from the get-go, and he'll take the fight to Forrest in what should be a wide decision win for the Latin Snake.

    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    2007: +12.45 units
    2008: +17.285 units

    Sergio Mora vs. Vernon Forrest
    Mora (+110) (Sportsbook)
    1 unit


    It's not the most exciting matchup, but a Mora play presents a good money-making opportunity.  Forrest is past his prime, and he was consistently beat to the punch in the first matchup with Mora a few months ago.  Forrest seemed to be having a career resurgence when he won a wide decision against Carlos Baldomir in July 2007, but that may have been a bit of a mirage as Baldomir proved to be a shot fighter when he lost to Saul Roman later in the year.  Prior to the Baldomir fight, Forrest won a very controversial decision over a faded Ike Quartey.  I see Forrest as being at the end of his rope, and there's no reason to think that his performance against Mora was just an "off night."  Instead, I expect Mora to have greater confidence from the get-go, and he'll take the fight to Forrest in what should be a wide decision win for the Latin Snake.

     
    19ecoboy79
    19ecoboy79
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 82
    Posted: Sep. 10, 2008 - 8:30 PM ET #2

    I agree whit you.
     
    I'll take Mora and Marquez.
     
    A parlay here would be fine.
     
    GL
     
    Reply
    I agree whit you.
     
    I'll take Mora and Marquez.
     
    A parlay here would be fine.
     
    GL
     
     
    SportsFan8890
    SportsFan8890
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 1098
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2008 - 5:42 PM ET #3

    Hate Mora and I think in the first fight, eventhough Vernon looked slow and old, he was still winning rounds early and then just faded. Think he underestimated Sergio and that probably won't happen again. Think all of those Contender guys are absolutely a joke
    Reply
    Hate Mora and I think in the first fight, eventhough Vernon looked slow and old, he was still winning rounds early and then just faded. Think he underestimated Sergio and that probably won't happen again. Think all of those Contender guys are absolutely a joke
     
    A2C
    A2C
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 5053
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2008 - 9:54 PM ET #4

    Hector Velazquez vs. Elio Rojas
    Rojas (+135)
    1 unit

    Nothing has changed for me as far as my take on this fight from when it was originally scheduled in January, although the odds are a little better on Rojas this time around.  Rojas was royally screwed in his only professional loss to Gamiel Diaz last July, which came by means of a controversial split decision.  Coming into this fight against the solid Velasquez after such long layoff would ordinarily present some concern, but doesn't worry me very much in this instance.  Rojas is 7 years younger than his opponent and comes into this fight with a major chip on his shoulder.  Velasquez, meanwhile, blew out his last 2 opponents (who, by the way, had lost a combined 6 out of their last 10 fights and who share a joint 29-29-1 record).  The elder Mexican faces an entirely different type of opponent in Rojas, who has everything on the line in this title fight and who is by all measures still coming into this own. Velasquez has a lot of miles on him at this stage of his career, having fought profesionally for 15 years.  He does have the superior pedigree, having shared the ring with both of the Pacquiao brothers, as well as Rockey Juarez (and Robie Peden, a name that will come up frequently this weekend).  However, he's lost neary every time he's stepped up, minus his TD against Mario Santiago a little over a year ago.  Still, I think the younger Rojas will not only be the busier man in this fight, but that he will also be the man landing cleaner, harder shots.  I look for Velasquez to put forth a stront effort, but in the end, I think it will be Rojas' hand that gets raised.  If Rojas can really  turn up the heat, there's also a chance he could win this one ITD somewhere in the latter rounds.
    Reply
    Hector Velazquez vs. Elio Rojas
    Rojas (+135)
    1 unit

    Nothing has changed for me as far as my take on this fight from when it was originally scheduled in January, although the odds are a little better on Rojas this time around.  Rojas was royally screwed in his only professional loss to Gamiel Diaz last July, which came by means of a controversial split decision.  Coming into this fight against the solid Velasquez after such long layoff would ordinarily present some concern, but doesn't worry me very much in this instance.  Rojas is 7 years younger than his opponent and comes into this fight with a major chip on his shoulder.  Velasquez, meanwhile, blew out his last 2 opponents (who, by the way, had lost a combined 6 out of their last 10 fights and who share a joint 29-29-1 record).  The elder Mexican faces an entirely different type of opponent in Rojas, who has everything on the line in this title fight and who is by all measures still coming into this own. Velasquez has a lot of miles on him at this stage of his career, having fought profesionally for 15 years.  He does have the superior pedigree, having shared the ring with both of the Pacquiao brothers, as well as Rockey Juarez (and Robie Peden, a name that will come up frequently this weekend).  However, he's lost neary every time he's stepped up, minus his TD against Mario Santiago a little over a year ago.  Still, I think the younger Rojas will not only be the busier man in this fight, but that he will also be the man landing cleaner, harder shots.  I look for Velasquez to put forth a stront effort, but in the end, I think it will be Rojas' hand that gets raised.  If Rojas can really  turn up the heat, there's also a chance he could win this one ITD somewhere in the latter rounds.
     
    A2C
    A2C
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 5053
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2008 - 10:04 PM ET #5

    Nate Campbell vs. Joan Guzman
    Guzman by Decision (+110) (Sportsbook)
    1 unit

    Going ahead and posting this one now while the prop is still at plus money, as it's hard to see where the line is headed as we get closer to Saturday.  There's been a good showing of money for Campbell during the last few days, but I have a great feeling about Guzman here.  Without a doubt, this is the marquee matchup of the weekend.   Be back with the full analysis. 
    Reply
    Nate Campbell vs. Joan Guzman
    Guzman by Decision (+110) (Sportsbook)
    1 unit

    Going ahead and posting this one now while the prop is still at plus money, as it's hard to see where the line is headed as we get closer to Saturday.  There's been a good showing of money for Campbell during the last few days, but I have a great feeling about Guzman here.  Without a doubt, this is the marquee matchup of the weekend.   Be back with the full analysis. 
     
    Coweringbeef
    Coweringbeef
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 223
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2008 - 8:11 AM ET #6

    I am tipping Pele Reid to upset Sam Sexton.

    The odds are set as though this were a long bout but in fact this is a three rounder. Reid is 35 facing a 24 year old which would normally count for something, but not in a three rounder. Pele has 17 KO’s within his 19 wins while Sam has 2 KO’s within his 7 wins. Now, in a three rounder, who has the edge?

    Strangely, between the two men are a total of six loses, 5 belonging to Reid, 1 to Sam, and all of them are TKO loses!

    Reid is an inch taller, stronger looking, and…um…black.

     

    I am tipping David Ferguson to win.

    I am really confident about his one, as confident as I was when I said Khan would win against Prescott! Doesn’t that make you feel like betting?

     

    And less confidently, Lee Swaby to win

    Reply

    I am tipping Pele Reid to upset Sam Sexton.

    The odds are set as though this were a long bout but in fact this is a three rounder. Reid is 35 facing a 24 year old which would normally count for something, but not in a three rounder. Pele has 17 KO’s within his 19 wins while Sam has 2 KO’s within his 7 wins. Now, in a three rounder, who has the edge?

    Strangely, between the two men are a total of six loses, 5 belonging to Reid, 1 to Sam, and all of them are TKO loses!

    Reid is an inch taller, stronger looking, and…um…black.

     

    I am tipping David Ferguson to win.

    I am really confident about his one, as confident as I was when I said Khan would win against Prescott! Doesn’t that make you feel like betting?

     

    And less confidently, Lee Swaby to win

     
    Coweringbeef
    Coweringbeef
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 223
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2008 - 8:36 AM ET #7

    Forget Lee Swaby, at these odds it ain’t worth it. Gotta get nearly even money on this one.

    Reply

    Forget Lee Swaby, at these odds it ain’t worth it. Gotta get nearly even money on this one.

     
    Zumbize
    Zumbize
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 668
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2008 - 12:17 PM ET #8

    Quote Originally Posted by A2C:

    Nate Campbell vs. Joan Guzman
    Guzman by Decision (+110) (Sportsbook)
    1 unit

    Going ahead and posting this one now while the prop is still at plus money, as it's hard to see where the line is headed as we get closer to Saturday.  There's been a good showing of money for Campbell during the last few days, but I have a great feeling about Guzman here.  Without a doubt, this is the marquee matchup of the weekend.   Be back with the full analysis. 


    Very interested to see what you've got here. Been leaning toward Nate for months, but a little nagging voice saying that Guzman won't wear down has kept me from dropping anything yet. This fight looks like a darkhorse FOTY candidate to me.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by A2C:

    Nate Campbell vs. Joan Guzman
    Guzman by Decision (+110) (Sportsbook)
    1 unit

    Going ahead and posting this one now while the prop is still at plus money, as it's hard to see where the line is headed as we get closer to Saturday.  There's been a good showing of money for Campbell during the last few days, but I have a great feeling about Guzman here.  Without a doubt, this is the marquee matchup of the weekend.   Be back with the full analysis. 


    Very interested to see what you've got here. Been leaning toward Nate for months, but a little nagging voice saying that Guzman won't wear down has kept me from dropping anything yet. This fight looks like a darkhorse FOTY candidate to me.
     
    N_J
    N_J
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2008
    Posts: 45
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2008 - 6:36 PM ET #9

    in April I caught a prop 'leader after 3 loses or draw' on Calzaghe/Hopkins, figuring I could do no worse than +270 on Hopkins. As luck would have it, I got +270 on Calzaghe.

    The same thing has happened for Mora/Forrest: leader after 3 loses or draw +140. Either guy +140 is a great bet, my prediction is Forrest is ahead after 3 (which ive also bet on), but then tires as Mora picks up steam, and loses the decision. Even if Mora is ahead after 3, Id still take forrest +140

    I have many other plays posted on the home forum, but this is the kind of prop im always looking out for.

    Reply
    in April I caught a prop 'leader after 3 loses or draw' on Calzaghe/Hopkins, figuring I could do no worse than +270 on Hopkins. As luck would have it, I got +270 on Calzaghe.

    The same thing has happened for Mora/Forrest: leader after 3 loses or draw +140. Either guy +140 is a great bet, my prediction is Forrest is ahead after 3 (which ive also bet on), but then tires as Mora picks up steam, and loses the decision. Even if Mora is ahead after 3, Id still take forrest +140

    I have many other plays posted on the home forum, but this is the kind of prop im always looking out for.

     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2008 - 7:05 PM ET #10

    Nice take on Rojas A2c, by the time I saw it copied at my books the odds had flip flopped.  Is it a 12 rounder or a 10 rounder, I might have overlooked it.
    Reply
    Nice take on Rojas A2c, by the time I saw it copied at my books the odds had flip flopped.  Is it a 12 rounder or a 10 rounder, I might have overlooked it.
     
    weepaul
    weepaul
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 132
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2008 - 7:21 PM ET #11

    Quote Originally Posted by A2C:

    Nate Campbell vs. Joan Guzman
    Guzman by Decision (+110) (Sportsbook)
    1 unit

    Going ahead and posting this one now while the prop is still at plus money, as it's hard to see where the line is headed as we get closer to Saturday.  There's been a good showing of money for Campbell during the last few days, but I have a great feeling about Guzman here.  Without a doubt, this is the marquee matchup of the weekend.   Be back with the full analysis. 

    How can Guzman be almost 4 pounds over in a division he has never fought in. I have a HUGE wager on Guzman and this news Fucking sucks balls!!!

    Good luck all!!

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by A2C:

    Nate Campbell vs. Joan Guzman
    Guzman by Decision (+110) (Sportsbook)
    1 unit

    Going ahead and posting this one now while the prop is still at plus money, as it's hard to see where the line is headed as we get closer to Saturday.  There's been a good showing of money for Campbell during the last few days, but I have a great feeling about Guzman here.  Without a doubt, this is the marquee matchup of the weekend.   Be back with the full analysis. 

    How can Guzman be almost 4 pounds over in a division he has never fought in. I have a HUGE wager on Guzman and this news Fucking sucks balls!!!

    Good luck all!!

     
    NJDevils
    NJDevils
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2004
    Posts: 33122
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2008 - 7:35 PM ET #12

    I would take Guzman in that fight
     
    In the PPV fights that I am not paying for I will take Forrest and JMM
     
    The only way I see JMM losing is if he left too much of himself in there with Manny (which may have happened) but i think he is too good for Casamayor
    Reply
    I would take Guzman in that fight
     
    In the PPV fights that I am not paying for I will take Forrest and JMM
     
    The only way I see JMM losing is if he left too much of himself in there with Manny (which may have happened) but i think he is too good for Casamayor
     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2008 - 7:52 PM ET #13

    Quote Originally Posted by weepaul:

    How can Guzman be almost 4 pounds over in a division he has never fought in. I have a HUGE wager on Guzman and this news Fucking sucks balls!!!

    Good luck all!!



    Yeah, I was in shock when I saw that.  That is a lot of weight to lose.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by weepaul:

    How can Guzman be almost 4 pounds over in a division he has never fought in. I have a HUGE wager on Guzman and this news Fucking sucks balls!!!

    Good luck all!!



    Yeah, I was in shock when I saw that.  That is a lot of weight to lose.
     
    Zumbize
    Zumbize
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 668
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2008 - 7:57 PM ET #14

    I'm seeing that Joan has one hour to lose three pounds. Not sure yet if the fight will happen without weight being made (although if I know Nate, it should still happen...)
    Reply
    I'm seeing that Joan has one hour to lose three pounds. Not sure yet if the fight will happen without weight being made (although if I know Nate, it should still happen...)
     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2008 - 8:12 PM ET #15

    Quote Originally Posted by N_J:

    in April I caught a prop 'leader after 3 loses or draw' on Calzaghe/Hopkins, figuring I could do no worse than +270 on Hopkins. As luck would have it, I got +270 on Calzaghe.

    The same thing has happened for Mora/Forrest: leader after 3 loses or draw +140. Either guy +140 is a great bet, my prediction is Forrest is ahead after 3 (which ive also bet on), but then tires as Mora picks up steam, and loses the decision. Even if Mora is ahead after 3, Id still take forrest +140

    I have many other plays posted on the home forum, but this is the kind of prop im always looking out for.



    I like this prop that 5dimes does for these HBO matchups.  I cashed in on it in Clottey-Judah.  I may have to go the same route here.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by N_J:

    in April I caught a prop 'leader after 3 loses or draw' on Calzaghe/Hopkins, figuring I could do no worse than +270 on Hopkins. As luck would have it, I got +270 on Calzaghe.

    The same thing has happened for Mora/Forrest: leader after 3 loses or draw +140. Either guy +140 is a great bet, my prediction is Forrest is ahead after 3 (which ive also bet on), but then tires as Mora picks up steam, and loses the decision. Even if Mora is ahead after 3, Id still take forrest +140

    I have many other plays posted on the home forum, but this is the kind of prop im always looking out for.



    I like this prop that 5dimes does for these HBO matchups.  I cashed in on it in Clottey-Judah.  I may have to go the same route here.
     
    Zumbize
    Zumbize
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 668
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2008 - 9:17 PM ET #16

    Guzman fails to make weight, titles won't be on the line. Fight still seems likely to go on.
    Reply
    Guzman fails to make weight, titles won't be on the line. Fight still seems likely to go on.
     
    CW123
    CW123
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2008
    Posts: 303
    Posted: Sep. 13, 2008 - 2:46 AM ET #17

    Quote Originally Posted by A2C:

    2007: +12.45 units
    2008: +17.285 units

    Sergio Mora vs. Vernon Forrest
    Mora (+110) (Sportsbook)
    1 unit


    It's not the most exciting matchup, but a Mora play presents a good money-making opportunity.  Forrest is past his prime, and he was consistently beat to the punch in the first matchup with Mora a few months ago.  Forrest seemed to be having a career resurgence when he won a wide decision against Carlos Baldomir in July 2007, but that may have been a bit of a mirage as Baldomir proved to be a shot fighter when he lost to Saul Roman later in the year.  Prior to the Baldomir fight, Forrest won a very controversial decision over a faded Ike Quartey.  I see Forrest as being at the end of his rope, and there's no reason to think that his performance against Mora was just an "off night."  Instead, I expect Mora to have greater confidence from the get-go, and he'll take the fight to Forrest in what should be a wide decision win for the Latin Snake.





    When did Baldo lose to Saul Roman??? Are you even talking about the right fighter????
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by A2C:

    2007: +12.45 units
    2008: +17.285 units

    Sergio Mora vs. Vernon Forrest
    Mora (+110) (Sportsbook)
    1 unit


    It's not the most exciting matchup, but a Mora play presents a good money-making opportunity.  Forrest is past his prime, and he was consistently beat to the punch in the first matchup with Mora a few months ago.  Forrest seemed to be having a career resurgence when he won a wide decision against Carlos Baldomir in July 2007, but that may have been a bit of a mirage as Baldomir proved to be a shot fighter when he lost to Saul Roman later in the year.  Prior to the Baldomir fight, Forrest won a very controversial decision over a faded Ike Quartey.  I see Forrest as being at the end of his rope, and there's no reason to think that his performance against Mora was just an "off night."  Instead, I expect Mora to have greater confidence from the get-go, and he'll take the fight to Forrest in what should be a wide decision win for the Latin Snake.





    When did Baldo lose to Saul Roman??? Are you even talking about the right fighter????
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Sep. 13, 2008 - 4:59 AM ET #18

    I don't understand the Guzman love. Superior boxer. Faster. Better pedigree. Seems too easy, right?
     
    However, he comes in overweight. Much smaller fighter taking a step up. Campbell just beat a guy that looked unbeatable. He outworked Diaz when nobody thought he could. Was that his one lucky fight? My guess is no.
     
    Read the story. Working at a grocery store and takes up boxing at 24. Grinds it out and becomes world champ against the odds. He didn't beat Diaz via a lucky punch. Beat him with effort. Why won't he do it again against a lesser fighter? When a fighter feels (here comes the cliche.. "disrespected" they have a huge edge. If you need an example, see Campbell/Diaz or more recently Cotto/Margarito. Campbell finally gets some respect after stopping Guzman in the later rounds.
     
    I don't have a problem with a Guzman via points prop. Not a bad bet, just not the best value here. Also, which fighter has fought the better competition? On what type of stage? All signs point to the hungrier, bigger, stronger, disrespected fighter that has fought better opponents. The best part is that he isn't the one laying chalk.
    Reply
    I don't understand the Guzman love. Superior boxer. Faster. Better pedigree. Seems too easy, right?
     
    However, he comes in overweight. Much smaller fighter taking a step up. Campbell just beat a guy that looked unbeatable. He outworked Diaz when nobody thought he could. Was that his one lucky fight? My guess is no.
     
    Read the story. Working at a grocery store and takes up boxing at 24. Grinds it out and becomes world champ against the odds. He didn't beat Diaz via a lucky punch. Beat him with effort. Why won't he do it again against a lesser fighter? When a fighter feels (here comes the cliche.. "disrespected" they have a huge edge. If you need an example, see Campbell/Diaz or more recently Cotto/Margarito. Campbell finally gets some respect after stopping Guzman in the later rounds.
     
    I don't have a problem with a Guzman via points prop. Not a bad bet, just not the best value here. Also, which fighter has fought the better competition? On what type of stage? All signs point to the hungrier, bigger, stronger, disrespected fighter that has fought better opponents. The best part is that he isn't the one laying chalk.
     
    A2C
    A2C
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 5053
    Posted: Sep. 13, 2008 - 3:49 PM ET #19

    Quote Originally Posted by CW123:





    When did Baldo lose to Saul Roman??? Are you even talking about the right fighter????


    Sorry about that.  You're right.  I had the Ouma-Roman fight confused in my mind with Baldo's matchup against Luciano Perez.  Both were on Telefutura a little while back.  Baldo looked terrible in his bout with Perez, and was lucky to escape with a majority decision.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by CW123:





    When did Baldo lose to Saul Roman??? Are you even talking about the right fighter????


    Sorry about that.  You're right.  I had the Ouma-Roman fight confused in my mind with Baldo's matchup against Luciano Perez.  Both were on Telefutura a little while back.  Baldo looked terrible in his bout with Perez, and was lucky to escape with a majority decision.
     
    CW123
    CW123
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2008
    Posts: 303
    Posted: Sep. 13, 2008 - 5:54 PM ET #20

    Quote Originally Posted by A2C:



    Sorry about that.  You're right.  I had the Ouma-Roman fight confused in my mind with Baldo's matchup against Luciano Perez.  Both were on Telefutura a little while back.  Baldo looked terrible in his bout with Perez, and was lucky to escape with a majority decision.


    Ok understandable. I thought for a second I was losing it
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by A2C:



    Sorry about that.  You're right.  I had the Ouma-Roman fight confused in my mind with Baldo's matchup against Luciano Perez.  Both were on Telefutura a little while back.  Baldo looked terrible in his bout with Perez, and was lucky to escape with a majority decision.


    Ok understandable. I thought for a second I was losing it
     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: Sep. 13, 2008 - 7:22 PM ET #21

    Quote Originally Posted by Coweringbeef:

    I am tipping Pele Reid to upset Sam Sexton.

    The odds are set as though this were a long bout but in fact this is a three rounder. Reid is 35 facing a 24 year old which would normally count for something, but not in a three rounder. Pele has 17 KO’s within his 19 wins while Sam has 2 KO’s within his 7 wins. Now, in a three rounder, who has the edge?

    Strangely, between the two men are a total of six loses, 5 belonging to Reid, 1 to Sam, and all of them are TKO loses!

    Reid is an inch taller, stronger looking, and…um…black.

     

    I am tipping David Ferguson to win.

    I am really confident about his one, as confident as I was when I said Khan would win against Prescott! Doesn’t that make you feel like betting?

     

    And less confidently, Lee Swaby to win



    What was the deal with that card?  Was it a tournament format or something?  From the looks of it on boxrec Sexton won it all since he won three fights.  It's pretty tough to bet three round fights with relative unknowns.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Coweringbeef:

    I am tipping Pele Reid to upset Sam Sexton.

    The odds are set as though this were a long bout but in fact this is a three rounder. Reid is 35 facing a 24 year old which would normally count for something, but not in a three rounder. Pele has 17 KO’s within his 19 wins while Sam has 2 KO’s within his 7 wins. Now, in a three rounder, who has the edge?

    Strangely, between the two men are a total of six loses, 5 belonging to Reid, 1 to Sam, and all of them are TKO loses!

    Reid is an inch taller, stronger looking, and…um…black.

     

    I am tipping David Ferguson to win.

    I am really confident about his one, as confident as I was when I said Khan would win against Prescott! Doesn’t that make you feel like betting?

     

    And less confidently, Lee Swaby to win



    What was the deal with that card?  Was it a tournament format or something?  From the looks of it on boxrec Sexton won it all since he won three fights.  It's pretty tough to bet three round fights with relative unknowns.
     
    cashaholic
    cashaholic
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2008
    Posts: 12122
    Posted: Sep. 13, 2008 - 9:46 PM ET #22

    take forrest ml
    Reply
    take forrest ml
     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: Sep. 13, 2008 - 10:08 PM ET #23

    Great call on Rojas A2C, well done buddy.
    Reply
    Great call on Rojas A2C, well done buddy.
     
    A2C
    A2C
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 5053
    Posted: Sep. 13, 2008 - 10:46 PM ET #24

    Hector Velazquez vs. Elio Rojas
    Rojas (+135)
    1.35 units

    Had a great feeling on this one.  I think it closed around -150 for Rojas, so this is a great example of jumping on those early favorable lines before the market corrects itself. 
    Reply
    Hector Velazquez vs. Elio Rojas
    Rojas (+135)
    1.35 units

    Had a great feeling on this one.  I think it closed around -150 for Rojas, so this is a great example of jumping on those early favorable lines before the market corrects itself. 
     
     
    A2C
    A2C
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 5053
    Posted: Sep. 14, 2008 - 2:24 AM ET #25

    Sergio Mora vs. Vernon Forrest
    Mora (+110) (Sportsbook)
    1 unit 

    Actually, someone should shoot me for betting on Mora. 

    Reply
    Sergio Mora vs. Vernon Forrest
    Mora (+110) (Sportsbook)
    1 unit 

    Actually, someone should shoot me for betting on Mora. 

    All Forums | Boxing
    12 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Claiming Prizes 57,789
    • Tuesday 10/20/2026 861
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,234
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 61,592
    • PART DEUX 151
    • Congrats to ltdsks - 20 wins in a row! 5,075
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,286
    • Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity 33,163
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 26,088
    • NCAA WEEK 8. (( 151 )) 2,488

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.