• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NBA Opening Night
      NBA Opening Night
      • NBA Odds
      • NBA Picks
      • Thunder-Spurs Picks
      • NBA Prediction Markets
      • NBA Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Boxing

    This Weekend

    12 Next Last»
    HakAttack1
    Fullbrights
    PUSHING-IT
    G8RB8
    deucestar
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 1201
    Posts: 26
    12 Next Last»
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: May. 14, 2008 - 5:39 PM ET #1

    +5.7 units last week, +3 units posted plays

    One play tonight,

    Joel Torres/Christopher Fernandez Under 7.5 (-105) 1.05 units to win 1 unit

    Fernandez has spent a good deal of his career on the canvas. He's been knocked out 3 times and down others. Now, he makes the long trip from Salt Lake City to the big city to face Torres, who certainly has shown knockout power against limited competition. I think the competition is limited again tonight and this is a showcase for the kid on ESPN2.



    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    +5.7 units last week, +3 units posted plays

    One play tonight,

    Joel Torres/Christopher Fernandez Under 7.5 (-105) 1.05 units to win 1 unit

    Fernandez has spent a good deal of his career on the canvas. He's been knocked out 3 times and down others. Now, he makes the long trip from Salt Lake City to the big city to face Torres, who certainly has shown knockout power against limited competition. I think the competition is limited again tonight and this is a showcase for the kid on ESPN2.



     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: May. 14, 2008 - 11:08 PM ET #2

    I knew the under might be in some trouble when they said that Ivan Calderon was in Torres's corner.  That's never a good sign of an early ending.  Torres just didn't look like much to me, I wonder what Dibella sees in the kid.
    Reply
    I knew the under might be in some trouble when they said that Ivan Calderon was in Torres's corner.  That's never a good sign of an early ending.  Torres just didn't look like much to me, I wonder what Dibella sees in the kid.
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: May. 15, 2008 - 3:51 AM ET #3

    Quote Originally Posted by Fullbrights:

    I knew the under might be in some trouble when they said that Ivan Calderon was in Torres's corner.  That's never a good sign of an early ending.  Torres just didn't look like much to me, I wonder what Dibella sees in the kid.


    Yeah I agree, though I thought he won the fight. Bad call there. Proves me right to be making plays based almost entirely on boxrec.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Fullbrights:

    I knew the under might be in some trouble when they said that Ivan Calderon was in Torres's corner.  That's never a good sign of an early ending.  Torres just didn't look like much to me, I wonder what Dibella sees in the kid.


    Yeah I agree, though I thought he won the fight. Bad call there. Proves me right to be making plays based almost entirely on boxrec.
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: May. 16, 2008 - 6:22 PM ET #4

    Just can't find anything worth playing tonight, but getting in on some plays tomorrow with more to come:

    Gamboa/Jimenez Under 9.5 (-105) 1.05 units to win 1

    Gamboa has never gone more than 6 rounds and while I don't think that streak will continue forever, it could tomorrow night. I haven't read anyone that thinks that Gamboa is anything but the real deal and a legit blue chipper. I've only seen him on youtube, but I agree. He's got the power to hurt a guy like Jimenez, who will be coming forward. Jimenez's last 8 wins have been by KO too, just adding to the value on this play.

    Eromosele Albert (+375) over James Kirkland .5 units to win 1.88 units

    Got a little in on this and will get more on it tomorrow. Kirkland just seems way too raw to be laying this prive against Albert who is workmanlike and will find him and wear him down. The fear is that Kirkland catches him with the power, but if Albert can set the pace and avoid the big shots, I think he could win this fight easily.
    Reply
    Just can't find anything worth playing tonight, but getting in on some plays tomorrow with more to come:

    Gamboa/Jimenez Under 9.5 (-105) 1.05 units to win 1

    Gamboa has never gone more than 6 rounds and while I don't think that streak will continue forever, it could tomorrow night. I haven't read anyone that thinks that Gamboa is anything but the real deal and a legit blue chipper. I've only seen him on youtube, but I agree. He's got the power to hurt a guy like Jimenez, who will be coming forward. Jimenez's last 8 wins have been by KO too, just adding to the value on this play.

    Eromosele Albert (+375) over James Kirkland .5 units to win 1.88 units

    Got a little in on this and will get more on it tomorrow. Kirkland just seems way too raw to be laying this prive against Albert who is workmanlike and will find him and wear him down. The fear is that Kirkland catches him with the power, but if Albert can set the pace and avoid the big shots, I think he could win this fight easily.
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: May. 17, 2008 - 4:31 AM ET #5

    Adding. . .

    Alexander Munoz (+315) over Mijares 1 unit to win 3.15

    Just too much value here and I held off for a while because Mijares is one of my favorite fighters and he made me $ against Arce. He's a rare fighter in that he makes action fights but is also a great technician which makes him difficult to beat. That said, he is hittable. And Munoz can hit. He can hit harder than Jose Navarro who pushed Mijares to the brink. I still think Mijares won that fight but he wasn't himself after he ate some shots and if Munoz can get into his head, I think he can pull the upset.

    Gamboa/Jimenez Under 9.5 (-105) 1.05 to win 1

    Adding another unit.

    Probably a little more tomorrow when the decision props hit.
    Reply
    Adding. . .

    Alexander Munoz (+315) over Mijares 1 unit to win 3.15

    Just too much value here and I held off for a while because Mijares is one of my favorite fighters and he made me $ against Arce. He's a rare fighter in that he makes action fights but is also a great technician which makes him difficult to beat. That said, he is hittable. And Munoz can hit. He can hit harder than Jose Navarro who pushed Mijares to the brink. I still think Mijares won that fight but he wasn't himself after he ate some shots and if Munoz can get into his head, I think he can pull the upset.

    Gamboa/Jimenez Under 9.5 (-105) 1.05 to win 1

    Adding another unit.

    Probably a little more tomorrow when the decision props hit.
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: May. 17, 2008 - 2:15 PM ET #6

    Albert (+450) over Kirkland 1 unit to win 4.5 units

    Munoz by 12 rd decision (+1314) .25 units to win 3.29 units

    All right thats it for me for tonight. Good luck to everyone.
    Reply
    Albert (+450) over Kirkland 1 unit to win 4.5 units

    Munoz by 12 rd decision (+1314) .25 units to win 3.29 units

    All right thats it for me for tonight. Good luck to everyone.
     
    PUSHING-IT
    PUSHING-IT
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 2596
    Posted: May. 17, 2008 - 2:21 PM ET #7

    Where from in MA.? Hak?
    Reply
    Where from in MA.? Hak?
     
    G8RB8
    G8RB8
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2005
    Posts: 30086
    Posted: May. 17, 2008 - 5:54 PM ET #8

    I went with Munoz myself hak. . .  +320
     
    Gl to us
    Bagel Sandwiches Suck
    Reply
    I went with Munoz myself hak. . .  +320
     
    Gl to us
     
    deucestar
    deucestar
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 20
    Posted: May. 17, 2008 - 7:29 PM ET #9

    I placed a few small bets for tonite just .25 units on each
     
    Cristian Mijares/Alexander Munoz under 9½ +275
    James Kirkland/Eromosele Albert under 9½ +110
    Darling Jimenez/Yuriorkis Gamboa under 9½ -135
     
     
    GL to you all
    Reply
    I placed a few small bets for tonite just .25 units on each
     
    Cristian Mijares/Alexander Munoz under 9½ +275
    James Kirkland/Eromosele Albert under 9½ +110
    Darling Jimenez/Yuriorkis Gamboa under 9½ -135
     
     
    GL to you all
     
    weepaul
    weepaul
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 132
    Posted: May. 17, 2008 - 7:48 PM ET #10

    Quote Originally Posted by deucestar:

    I placed a few small bets for tonite just .25 units on each
     
    Cristian Mijares/Alexander Munoz under 9½ +275
    James Kirkland/Eromosele Albert under 9½ +110
    Darling Jimenez/Yuriorkis Gamboa under 9½ -135
     
     
    GL to you all

     

    Jeez Bud, You need to get your bets in a bit sooner.

    Yesterday Gambo and Kirkland under were both +160.

     

    I am with you on those 2 bets but I think Mijares beats Munoz on points.

     

    Good luck All.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by deucestar:

    I placed a few small bets for tonite just .25 units on each
     
    Cristian Mijares/Alexander Munoz under 9½ +275
    James Kirkland/Eromosele Albert under 9½ +110
    Darling Jimenez/Yuriorkis Gamboa under 9½ -135
     
     
    GL to you all

     

    Jeez Bud, You need to get your bets in a bit sooner.

    Yesterday Gambo and Kirkland under were both +160.

     

    I am with you on those 2 bets but I think Mijares beats Munoz on points.

     

    Good luck All.

     
    deucestar
    deucestar
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 20
    Posted: May. 17, 2008 - 7:51 PM ET #11

    I'm new to this beeting thing and didnt know the sooner you place your bets the better the odds
     
    Reply
    I'm new to this beeting thing and didnt know the sooner you place your bets the better the odds
     
     
    deucestar
    deucestar
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 20
    Posted: May. 17, 2008 - 9:58 PM ET #12

    I placed another .25 unit on Richard Gutierrez +280
    lets see what happens got the win on krikland under
     
    Reply
    I placed another .25 unit on Richard Gutierrez +280
    lets see what happens got the win on krikland under
     
     
    deucestar
    deucestar
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 20
    Posted: May. 17, 2008 - 10:33 PM ET #13

    that angulo fight was good thought I had oh well gl to u all
    Reply
    that angulo fight was good thought I had oh well gl to u all
     
    weepaul
    weepaul
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 132
    Posted: May. 18, 2008 - 1:00 AM ET #14

    Quote Originally Posted by deucestar:

    I'm new to this beeting thing and didnt know the sooner you place your bets the better the odds
     

    That's not alway's the case bud.

    In some cases you are better to wait. Check out what AC2 or Fullbrights have to say. They know what they are talking about and it will give you an idea of what way the lines will swing.

     

    Cotto/Margarito is a good example. If you are going to bet on Cotto, I would suggest you bet as soon as possible. If you are going to bet Margarito, I would suggest you wait until the last minute.

     

    Good luck to you.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by deucestar:

    I'm new to this beeting thing and didnt know the sooner you place your bets the better the odds
     

    That's not alway's the case bud.

    In some cases you are better to wait. Check out what AC2 or Fullbrights have to say. They know what they are talking about and it will give you an idea of what way the lines will swing.

     

    Cotto/Margarito is a good example. If you are going to bet on Cotto, I would suggest you bet as soon as possible. If you are going to bet Margarito, I would suggest you wait until the last minute.

     

    Good luck to you.

     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: May. 18, 2008 - 3:51 AM ET #15

    -5.9 units for the week, can't seem to get any momentum going.


    -Bad call on Albert as he apparently wasnt ready to whether a first round barrage from Kirkland, which was my biggest fear. I still don't believe in Kirkland but you cant argue he can punch.

    - One punch cost me in the Gamboa fight as if Jimenez doesn't score that knockdown, I doubt the corner/ref allow him to be hammered over ten rounds without that glimmer. Gamboa just didn't seem like he had it in him to stop him in the later rounds, which I guess comes with the territory as hes never been there. Tough effort by Jimenez though and he deserved to see the final bell.

    - Havent seen the Mijares fight but it sounds like it wasn't a robbery or anything. I still like my plays there as I figured it would be competitive, I just hoped Munoz at 3-1 did enough. He came up short I guess.

    Hellish week gotta get back on the + side next week.
    Reply
    -5.9 units for the week, can't seem to get any momentum going.


    -Bad call on Albert as he apparently wasnt ready to whether a first round barrage from Kirkland, which was my biggest fear. I still don't believe in Kirkland but you cant argue he can punch.

    - One punch cost me in the Gamboa fight as if Jimenez doesn't score that knockdown, I doubt the corner/ref allow him to be hammered over ten rounds without that glimmer. Gamboa just didn't seem like he had it in him to stop him in the later rounds, which I guess comes with the territory as hes never been there. Tough effort by Jimenez though and he deserved to see the final bell.

    - Havent seen the Mijares fight but it sounds like it wasn't a robbery or anything. I still like my plays there as I figured it would be competitive, I just hoped Munoz at 3-1 did enough. He came up short I guess.

    Hellish week gotta get back on the + side next week.
     
    G8RB8
    G8RB8
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2005
    Posts: 30086
    Posted: May. 18, 2008 - 1:35 PM ET #16

    Hak. . .  Mijares clearly won the fight, I watched it from rd 3 on.  He was in clear control, and even though Munoz was the aggressor, competitive, and had some good punches, he had no control and Mijares made him miss quite a bit (almost to the point of embarrassment).  Mijares clearly outboxed him.
     
    However, being the aggressor almost got us the W. . .  it was a split decision.  Would have actually been a robbery IMO if Munoz would have won, but I would have taken it
     
    It was certainly worthy of +320, Munoz was punching lights out with all heart til the end and didn't quit, but he just didn't have enough really to keep up with Mijares's technique and speed. Plus, he got a pt deducted somewhere around the 6th for hitting behind the head after about 5 warnings.  The ref didn't want to deduct anything but at that point he had to. . . that in turn gave us a few more good rds out of Munoz cause he was pissed  Had he actually connected at a much higher %, we'd have had a much better shot cause he was swinging for the fences throughout.
     
    Oh well. . .  always next time
     
     
    Bagel Sandwiches Suck
    Reply
    Hak. . .  Mijares clearly won the fight, I watched it from rd 3 on.  He was in clear control, and even though Munoz was the aggressor, competitive, and had some good punches, he had no control and Mijares made him miss quite a bit (almost to the point of embarrassment).  Mijares clearly outboxed him.
     
    However, being the aggressor almost got us the W. . .  it was a split decision.  Would have actually been a robbery IMO if Munoz would have won, but I would have taken it
     
    It was certainly worthy of +320, Munoz was punching lights out with all heart til the end and didn't quit, but he just didn't have enough really to keep up with Mijares's technique and speed. Plus, he got a pt deducted somewhere around the 6th for hitting behind the head after about 5 warnings.  The ref didn't want to deduct anything but at that point he had to. . . that in turn gave us a few more good rds out of Munoz cause he was pissed  Had he actually connected at a much higher %, we'd have had a much better shot cause he was swinging for the fences throughout.
     
    Oh well. . .  always next time
     
     
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: May. 18, 2008 - 8:37 PM ET #17



    Yeah the more I read about it the more it looks like Mijares was in control most of the way. Why are judges not willing to give him unanimous decisions?
    Reply


    Yeah the more I read about it the more it looks like Mijares was in control most of the way. Why are judges not willing to give him unanimous decisions?
     
    weepaul
    weepaul
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 132
    Posted: May. 18, 2008 - 10:01 PM ET #18

    Quote Originally Posted by HakAttack1:



    Yeah the more I read about it the more it looks like Mijares was in control most of the way. Why are judges not willing to give him unanimous decisions?

     

    That one guy must have been the WBA judge LOL. I watched the fight and there is no way it should have been split.

    Towards the last couple of rounds, I was starting to think Munoz might get stopped.He was running on fumes.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by HakAttack1:



    Yeah the more I read about it the more it looks like Mijares was in control most of the way. Why are judges not willing to give him unanimous decisions?

     

    That one guy must have been the WBA judge LOL. I watched the fight and there is no way it should have been split.

    Towards the last couple of rounds, I was starting to think Munoz might get stopped.He was running on fumes.

     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: May. 19, 2008 - 4:30 AM ET #19

    Getting a few futures i just put in on the record here. . .

    Mora/Forrest Over 10.5 (-170) 3.4 units to win 2

    Ricardo Torres (+260) over Kendall Holt 2 units to win 5.2


    Reply
    Getting a few futures i just put in on the record here. . .

    Mora/Forrest Over 10.5 (-170) 3.4 units to win 2

    Ricardo Torres (+260) over Kendall Holt 2 units to win 5.2


     
    A2C
    A2C
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 5053
    Posted: May. 19, 2008 - 9:36 AM ET #20

    Quote Originally Posted by HakAttack1:

    Getting a few futures i just put in on the record here. . .

    Mora/Forrest Over 10.5 (-170) 3.4 units to win 2

    Ricardo Torres (+260) over Kendall Holt 2 units to win 5.2




    I like the Torres play, as I find it odd for him to be dogged so much after KO'ing Holt last time, and Holt looking subpar against Tackie in his last outing.  Holt doesn't have the best chin, so all Torres needs to do is crack him once.

    But I don't know about laying all that chalk on the Mora-Forrest over.  Mora's looked really bad his last two times out, and I wouldn't be surprised to see Forrest stop him.  Mora's lost a step, which is causing him to get hit more directly than he had during his "contender" days.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by HakAttack1:

    Getting a few futures i just put in on the record here. . .

    Mora/Forrest Over 10.5 (-170) 3.4 units to win 2

    Ricardo Torres (+260) over Kendall Holt 2 units to win 5.2




    I like the Torres play, as I find it odd for him to be dogged so much after KO'ing Holt last time, and Holt looking subpar against Tackie in his last outing.  Holt doesn't have the best chin, so all Torres needs to do is crack him once.

    But I don't know about laying all that chalk on the Mora-Forrest over.  Mora's looked really bad his last two times out, and I wouldn't be surprised to see Forrest stop him.  Mora's lost a step, which is causing him to get hit more directly than he had during his "contender" days.
     
    Zumbize
    Zumbize
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 668
    Posted: May. 19, 2008 - 1:02 PM ET #21

    Keep your head up Hak, dropped a little under 2 units myself this weekend. Mijares started a little slow but he had Munoz punching air from about the third round on, and even rocked him with a nasty shot in the ninth. Which had me rattled, since I had the over parlayed with Gamboa.

    Also, remind me to reconsider any over plays involving Tony Weeks. I'm a fan first and not a sadist, so I'll support most quick triggers, but the man does not know the meaning of a standing eight count.
    Reply
    Keep your head up Hak, dropped a little under 2 units myself this weekend. Mijares started a little slow but he had Munoz punching air from about the third round on, and even rocked him with a nasty shot in the ninth. Which had me rattled, since I had the over parlayed with Gamboa.

    Also, remind me to reconsider any over plays involving Tony Weeks. I'm a fan first and not a sadist, so I'll support most quick triggers, but the man does not know the meaning of a standing eight count.
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: May. 19, 2008 - 2:17 PM ET #22

    Quote Originally Posted by A2C:



    I like the Torres play, as I find it odd for him to be dogged so much after KO'ing Holt last time, and Holt looking subpar against Tackie in his last outing.  Holt doesn't have the best chin, so all Torres needs to do is crack him once.

    But I don't know about laying all that chalk on the Mora-Forrest over.  Mora's looked really bad his last two times out, and I wouldn't be surprised to see Forrest stop him.  Mora's lost a step, which is causing him to get hit more directly than he had during his "contender" days.


    Exactly my thinking about Torres. Holt looked brutal against Tackie, a guy who is by all accounts shot. If he is lackluster in this one, he'll be rocked by Torres. I know the first fight was controversial but  in rewatching it Torres did come back to have Holt badly hurt late and I thought the stoppage wasn't that bad. I don't really see how any of this adds up to a +260 line.

    As for Mora, he has looked terrible since his contender days, true, but I still think he can move plenty to keep Forrest from landing anything truly damaging. I don't envision Forrest going for broke in a fight he will likely be able to control.

    Appreciate the insight.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by A2C:



    I like the Torres play, as I find it odd for him to be dogged so much after KO'ing Holt last time, and Holt looking subpar against Tackie in his last outing.  Holt doesn't have the best chin, so all Torres needs to do is crack him once.

    But I don't know about laying all that chalk on the Mora-Forrest over.  Mora's looked really bad his last two times out, and I wouldn't be surprised to see Forrest stop him.  Mora's lost a step, which is causing him to get hit more directly than he had during his "contender" days.


    Exactly my thinking about Torres. Holt looked brutal against Tackie, a guy who is by all accounts shot. If he is lackluster in this one, he'll be rocked by Torres. I know the first fight was controversial but  in rewatching it Torres did come back to have Holt badly hurt late and I thought the stoppage wasn't that bad. I don't really see how any of this adds up to a +260 line.

    As for Mora, he has looked terrible since his contender days, true, but I still think he can move plenty to keep Forrest from landing anything truly damaging. I don't envision Forrest going for broke in a fight he will likely be able to control.

    Appreciate the insight.
     
    PUSHING-IT
    PUSHING-IT
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 2596
    Posted: May. 22, 2008 - 1:17 PM ET #23

    Quote Originally Posted by HakAttack1:



    Exactly my thinking about Torres. Holt looked brutal against Tackie, a guy who is by all accounts shot. If he is lackluster in this one, he'll be rocked by Torres. I know the first fight was controversial but  in rewatching it Torres did come back to have Holt badly hurt late and I thought the stoppage wasn't that bad. I don't really see how any of this adds up to a +260 line.

    As for Mora, he has looked terrible since his contender days, true, but I still think he can move plenty to keep Forrest from landing anything truly damaging. I don't envision Forrest going for broke in a fight he will likely be able to control.

    Appreciate the insight.
    Forest is going to crush Mora! ive sparring on Mora getting crushed by Margorito granted its Margorito but he wasnt even competing.I can see another beat down of a Pretender
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by HakAttack1:



    Exactly my thinking about Torres. Holt looked brutal against Tackie, a guy who is by all accounts shot. If he is lackluster in this one, he'll be rocked by Torres. I know the first fight was controversial but  in rewatching it Torres did come back to have Holt badly hurt late and I thought the stoppage wasn't that bad. I don't really see how any of this adds up to a +260 line.

    As for Mora, he has looked terrible since his contender days, true, but I still think he can move plenty to keep Forrest from landing anything truly damaging. I don't envision Forrest going for broke in a fight he will likely be able to control.

    Appreciate the insight.
    Forest is going to crush Mora! ive sparring on Mora getting crushed by Margorito granted its Margorito but he wasnt even competing.I can see another beat down of a Pretender
     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: May. 22, 2008 - 8:22 PM ET #24

    Not saying the Torres play is bad at all.  I backed him last time against Holt and will again do the same, but in a different fashion.  Holt will always be fade material against a puncher, his chin is bad.

    Here's my philosophy on betting this fight though and maybe this will help those that are thinking about a Torres play.  Why take Torres ML here when they will offer fight outcomes for this fight?  I just don't think there is much value in taking Torres straight at that line when you will be able to get +400ish on ITD.  IMO Torres cannot win a decision over Holt outside of Columbia unless he brings his judges with him or puts Holt on the canvas 3-4 times over the distance.  Needless to say in my mind if Torres wins it will be by KO, so I would suggest to those wanting to bet Torres just wait for the KO prop.  That is what I will be doing.  Just my two cents.
    Reply
    Not saying the Torres play is bad at all.  I backed him last time against Holt and will again do the same, but in a different fashion.  Holt will always be fade material against a puncher, his chin is bad.

    Here's my philosophy on betting this fight though and maybe this will help those that are thinking about a Torres play.  Why take Torres ML here when they will offer fight outcomes for this fight?  I just don't think there is much value in taking Torres straight at that line when you will be able to get +400ish on ITD.  IMO Torres cannot win a decision over Holt outside of Columbia unless he brings his judges with him or puts Holt on the canvas 3-4 times over the distance.  Needless to say in my mind if Torres wins it will be by KO, so I would suggest to those wanting to bet Torres just wait for the KO prop.  That is what I will be doing.  Just my two cents.
     
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: May. 23, 2008 - 1:01 AM ET #25

    Quote Originally Posted by PUSHING-IT:

    Forest is going to crush Mora! ive sparring on Mora getting crushed by Margorito granted its Margorito but he wasnt even competing.I can see another beat down of a Pretender


    I guess I may be in the minority on this play. I'm no more a fan of Mora than anyone else in the world, but I don't think his chin/defense is anything worse than average. I rewatched Forrest's last few fights and I just don't see him, at 37, bringing anything explosive to the table that is going to make this fight end quickly. I also don't think he'll put himself in enough spots to wear him down at all like he did Piccorillo. "Contenders" have burned me in the past but I just envision a slow fight with minimal action and like the value on the over.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by PUSHING-IT:

    Forest is going to crush Mora! ive sparring on Mora getting crushed by Margorito granted its Margorito but he wasnt even competing.I can see another beat down of a Pretender


    I guess I may be in the minority on this play. I'm no more a fan of Mora than anyone else in the world, but I don't think his chin/defense is anything worse than average. I rewatched Forrest's last few fights and I just don't see him, at 37, bringing anything explosive to the table that is going to make this fight end quickly. I also don't think he'll put himself in enough spots to wear him down at all like he did Piccorillo. "Contenders" have burned me in the past but I just envision a slow fight with minimal action and like the value on the over.
    All Forums | Boxing
    12 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Claiming Prizes 57,789
    • Tuesday 10/20/2026 864
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,238
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 61,592
    • PART DEUX 153
    • Congrats to ltdsks - 20 wins in a row! 5,077
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,286
    • Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity 33,163
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 26,090
    • NCAA WEEK 8. (( 151 )) 2,502

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.