Posted:
#26
Quote Originally Posted by searchwarrant:
Well I'm a person of color and I do like Cheetahs.
Ahhh now i know why you're so fucking stupid.
Pacquiou didn't "work" at all, that is why he lost.
Posted:
#33
Quote Originally Posted by searchwarrant:
internett tuff guys in the boxing forum.
Hilarious to see what these donut/pizzza/drunken pukes look like.. Pack lost because he's lazy and did nothing to convince judges....nothing.
Cry to Nevada fat boys.
I didnt know that landing more punches, ring generalship, and having your opponent admit that he didnt win= losing. Were you even watching the same fight? Im not sure who this "Pack" guy is.
Posted:
#36
With the ass kicking that Vegas took on the favorite Miami and Over straight bets and parlays covering in game 7 in the NBA I was a bit skeptical about the fight from the beginning so I didn't bet Pac real big in the fight because I was suspicious of this exact sinerio. Pac-man WON THE FIGHT, however he did do too much standing around taking unessecary shots, waiting till the last minute of the rounds and sometimes the last 10 seconds before he decided to start boxing. Same thing happened several years back in the De La Hoya vs. Trinidad fight. It is almost as if you are marquee boxer facing an inferior opponent and you are passive or not aggressive and dominant the way the judges think you should be, even if you out box your opponent, they punish you. In my opinion is it right??? Hell No!!! But it is the way they score boxing.
Posted:
#38
For the "fix" belivers (and I believe) then look no further then Pac's last 10 second rounds on the stick. Minimal efffort, land some hard shots but don't follow with KO shots...just enough to keep it quiet.
If I were a prize fighter, that would be my precise move. Keep it close, take punches and sway the judges away from awarding me the fight..
Perfect plan.Judges saw it gentlemen...I think.
Hot Forum Topics
