de la h +5 pts and the lederman line -.5 for mayweather?
granted, I admit de la h didn't have any bidness even winning 1 judges scorecard, but I'll take it.
just want to close by saying you don't have to know a sport that great if the resources are out there and you're willing to put in the time and effort to listen/read what everyone is sayin.
i mean basically i middled the split decision
de la h +5 pts and the lederman line -.5 for mayweather?
granted, I admit de la h didn't have any bidness even winning 1 judges scorecard, but I'll take it.
just want to close by saying you don't have to know a sport that great if the resources are out there and you're willing to put in the time and effort to listen/read what everyone is sayin.
Hot Forum Topics
