• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NBA Opening Night
      NBA Opening Night
      • NBA Odds
      • NBA Picks
      • Thunder-Spurs Picks
      • NBA Prediction Markets
      • NBA Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Boxing

    Diaz/Malignaggi, Vitali/Johnson, Peterson/Bradley

    12 Next Last»
    walktheline
    nuttyrich
    FIT410s
    EricLinny
    Mack05
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 1209
    Posts: 33
    12 Next Last»
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2009 - 6:04 AM ET #1

     

    Malignaggi, +150, 5 units

    Malignaggi gets the win he should of had last time. Too much speed and gets an actual ring to move around in this time. Malignaggi will look better that he did in Houston. However, we might see some close cards. Probably 116-112, 115-113, 114-114, etc. Paulie gets the nod if the fight is even somewhat close imo. With both fighters having very limited options, a trilogy might already be planned.

    Vitali ITD/Bradley Parlay, 3 units to win 3.42

    Vitali stops his man as usual, Bradley beats a game Peterson at home. Nothing to see here folks.

    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.

     

    Malignaggi, +150, 5 units

    Malignaggi gets the win he should of had last time. Too much speed and gets an actual ring to move around in this time. Malignaggi will look better that he did in Houston. However, we might see some close cards. Probably 116-112, 115-113, 114-114, etc. Paulie gets the nod if the fight is even somewhat close imo. With both fighters having very limited options, a trilogy might already be planned.

    Vitali ITD/Bradley Parlay, 3 units to win 3.42

    Vitali stops his man as usual, Bradley beats a game Peterson at home. Nothing to see here folks.

     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2009 - 9:05 AM ET #2

    I like the Vitali pick, the Paulie pick, haven't seen enough of Peterson to see if he's a real threat... but Paulie gets this win, and Vitali gets his KO/stoppage.

    Good Luck with the fights :-)    
    Reply
    I like the Vitali pick, the Paulie pick, haven't seen enough of Peterson to see if he's a real threat... but Paulie gets this win, and Vitali gets his KO/stoppage.

    Good Luck with the fights :-)    
     
    FIT410s
    FIT410s
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2009
    Posts: 897
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2009 - 12:12 PM ET #3

    vitali under 9.5?
    Reply
    vitali under 9.5?
     
    EricLinny
    EricLinny
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2009
    Posts: 5068
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2009 - 2:19 PM ET #4

    I love that parlay.  Gonna go punch it in myself right now
    Reply
    I love that parlay.  Gonna go punch it in myself right now
     
    Mack05
    Mack05
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 4403
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2009 - 4:16 PM ET #5

    Don't like it. Except to see a Properly movtivated Diaz make sure there is no dispute in the rematch. For me 2 VERY overated fighters but for me Diaz all the way and for quite a large play too..
    Reply
    Don't like it. Except to see a Properly movtivated Diaz make sure there is no dispute in the rematch. For me 2 VERY overated fighters but for me Diaz all the way and for quite a large play too..
     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2009 - 7:59 PM ET #6

    Mack I don't see the fight as being disputed, it was clear that Paulie got ripped off.

    I don't think highly of Paulie probably because he lacks any real punch. I still see Diaz getting the very close rounds as he is still the more marketable fighter.

    The first fight Diaz LOST he knows it, some of the rounds weren't even close.

    I have yet to look at Peterson/Bradley what do you think of that fight?

    Klitcho ITD is a no brainer but I've yet to look at the odds.
    Reply
    Mack I don't see the fight as being disputed, it was clear that Paulie got ripped off.

    I don't think highly of Paulie probably because he lacks any real punch. I still see Diaz getting the very close rounds as he is still the more marketable fighter.

    The first fight Diaz LOST he knows it, some of the rounds weren't even close.

    I have yet to look at Peterson/Bradley what do you think of that fight?

    Klitcho ITD is a no brainer but I've yet to look at the odds.
     
    A2C
    A2C
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 5053
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2009 - 8:17 PM ET #7

    I'll be on Diaz as well.  Macks' right on that we're dealing with 2 overrated dudes here, but I think we saw the best Paulie could deliver in their first fight.   I'd like to think that Diaz is intelligent enough to figure out a different way to pace himself here, although that's clearly an area where he lacks discipline.
    Reply
    I'll be on Diaz as well.  Macks' right on that we're dealing with 2 overrated dudes here, but I think we saw the best Paulie could deliver in their first fight.   I'd like to think that Diaz is intelligent enough to figure out a different way to pace himself here, although that's clearly an area where he lacks discipline.
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2009 - 9:45 PM ET #8

    Quote Originally Posted by A2C:

    I'll be on Diaz as well.  Macks' right on that we're dealing with 2 overrated dudes here, but I think we saw the best Paulie could deliver in their first fight.   I'd like to think that Diaz is intelligent enough to figure out a different way to pace himself here, although that's clearly an area where he lacks discipline.

    I don't think that is the problem. He can't figure out how not to stop blocking jabs with his face. He can't figure out how to stop getting cut up every fight. He can't figure out how to get faster hands. He can't figure out how to cut of the ring and get inside and land those big hooks to the head and body.

    I don't know what everyone missed the first time. The smaller, slower Diaz was outboxed by the bigger, faster Malignaggi. It was very clear that Paulie won 8-4, 7-5. He gave him a boxing lesson.

    Now Malignaggi gets an extra half pound (fight at 139 instead of 138.5) which doesn't sound like much. However, Malignaggi's camp said that prior to the weigh-in for the first fight Malignaggi's mouth was so dry his gum was sticking to his teeth. He also gets the standard 20 foot ring instead of the phonebooth 18 foot ring they had for their first fight in Houston.

    Unless Diaz catches Malignaggi with something big, we'll see a repeat performance from Malignaggi if not more one sided than the first fight. Paulie wants this fight MUCH more than Diaz. Actually, how much longer is Diaz going to fight? He plans on going to law school and has made a ton of money already.

    Juan Diaz isn't the type of fighter that changes. Styles make fights, and Paulie has Diaz's number. It's very simple if you ask me.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by A2C:

    I'll be on Diaz as well.  Macks' right on that we're dealing with 2 overrated dudes here, but I think we saw the best Paulie could deliver in their first fight.   I'd like to think that Diaz is intelligent enough to figure out a different way to pace himself here, although that's clearly an area where he lacks discipline.

    I don't think that is the problem. He can't figure out how not to stop blocking jabs with his face. He can't figure out how to stop getting cut up every fight. He can't figure out how to get faster hands. He can't figure out how to cut of the ring and get inside and land those big hooks to the head and body.

    I don't know what everyone missed the first time. The smaller, slower Diaz was outboxed by the bigger, faster Malignaggi. It was very clear that Paulie won 8-4, 7-5. He gave him a boxing lesson.

    Now Malignaggi gets an extra half pound (fight at 139 instead of 138.5) which doesn't sound like much. However, Malignaggi's camp said that prior to the weigh-in for the first fight Malignaggi's mouth was so dry his gum was sticking to his teeth. He also gets the standard 20 foot ring instead of the phonebooth 18 foot ring they had for their first fight in Houston.

    Unless Diaz catches Malignaggi with something big, we'll see a repeat performance from Malignaggi if not more one sided than the first fight. Paulie wants this fight MUCH more than Diaz. Actually, how much longer is Diaz going to fight? He plans on going to law school and has made a ton of money already.

    Juan Diaz isn't the type of fighter that changes. Styles make fights, and Paulie has Diaz's number. It's very simple if you ask me.

     
    FIT410s
    FIT410s
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2009
    Posts: 897
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2009 - 11:37 PM ET #9

    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

    I don't think that is the problem. He can't figure out how not to stop blocking jabs with his face. He can't figure out how to stop getting cut up every fight. He can't figure out how to get faster hands. He can't figure out how to cut of the ring and get inside and land those big hooks to the head and body.

    I don't know what everyone missed the first time. The smaller, slower Diaz was outboxed by the bigger, faster Malignaggi. It was very clear that Paulie won 8-4, 7-5. He gave him a boxing lesson.

    Now Malignaggi gets an extra half pound (fight at 139 instead of 138.5) which doesn't sound like much. However, Malignaggi's camp said that prior to the weigh-in for the first fight Malignaggi's mouth was so dry his gum was sticking to his teeth. He also gets the standard 20 foot ring instead of the phonebooth 18 foot ring they had for their first fight in Houston.

    Unless Diaz catches Malignaggi with something big, we'll see a repeat performance from Malignaggi if not more one sided than the first fight. Paulie wants this fight MUCH more than Diaz. Actually, how much longer is Diaz going to fight? He plans on going to law school and has made a ton of money already.

    Juan Diaz isn't the type of fighter that changes. Styles make fights, and Paulie has Diaz's number. It's very simple if you ask me.



    my friend, I think you just told it like it is

    this fight could still go either way 60-40

    however

    vitali ITD is 95-5

    you do the match which is the better bet


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

    I don't think that is the problem. He can't figure out how not to stop blocking jabs with his face. He can't figure out how to stop getting cut up every fight. He can't figure out how to get faster hands. He can't figure out how to cut of the ring and get inside and land those big hooks to the head and body.

    I don't know what everyone missed the first time. The smaller, slower Diaz was outboxed by the bigger, faster Malignaggi. It was very clear that Paulie won 8-4, 7-5. He gave him a boxing lesson.

    Now Malignaggi gets an extra half pound (fight at 139 instead of 138.5) which doesn't sound like much. However, Malignaggi's camp said that prior to the weigh-in for the first fight Malignaggi's mouth was so dry his gum was sticking to his teeth. He also gets the standard 20 foot ring instead of the phonebooth 18 foot ring they had for their first fight in Houston.

    Unless Diaz catches Malignaggi with something big, we'll see a repeat performance from Malignaggi if not more one sided than the first fight. Paulie wants this fight MUCH more than Diaz. Actually, how much longer is Diaz going to fight? He plans on going to law school and has made a ton of money already.

    Juan Diaz isn't the type of fighter that changes. Styles make fights, and Paulie has Diaz's number. It's very simple if you ask me.



    my friend, I think you just told it like it is

    this fight could still go either way 60-40

    however

    vitali ITD is 95-5

    you do the match which is the better bet


     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Dec. 8, 2009 - 11:47 PM ET #10

    I don't know about 95-5, but it's probably much better than the 68% chance the odds of -215, -220, are offering.

     

    Reply

    I don't know about 95-5, but it's probably much better than the 68% chance the odds of -215, -220, are offering.

     

     
    Mack05
    Mack05
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 4403
    Posted: Dec. 9, 2009 - 9:22 AM ET #11

    Rich, I don't have a huge feeling on Peterson v Bradley. Maybe Bradley but there is no value there. I think he wins but I won't be playing.

    I will be playing Diaz. I don't think he could have fought a worse fight first time out. Being at home I think he underestimated Paulie. I think he will motivated this time round and I think he wins well, pretty much in the same way Hatton beat Malinaggi. I will be playing large on Diaz, writeup closer to the fight..

    Reply

    Rich, I don't have a huge feeling on Peterson v Bradley. Maybe Bradley but there is no value there. I think he wins but I won't be playing.

    I will be playing Diaz. I don't think he could have fought a worse fight first time out. Being at home I think he underestimated Paulie. I think he will motivated this time round and I think he wins well, pretty much in the same way Hatton beat Malinaggi. I will be playing large on Diaz, writeup closer to the fight..

     
    DannoDanger
    DannoDanger
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2008
    Posts: 3554
    Posted: Dec. 9, 2009 - 10:02 AM ET #12

    I agree with Mack here.  I expect Diaz to really step up the pressure on Malinaggi and throw a million punches a round.  He knows that Malinaggi can't hurt him, and he knows that he is way outclassed in terms of boxing skill.  His only option is to overwhelm Paulie and pressure him all night.  Diaz should be right in his chest all night and never let up.  If he does this, he wins a wide decision. 
    Reply
    I agree with Mack here.  I expect Diaz to really step up the pressure on Malinaggi and throw a million punches a round.  He knows that Malinaggi can't hurt him, and he knows that he is way outclassed in terms of boxing skill.  His only option is to overwhelm Paulie and pressure him all night.  Diaz should be right in his chest all night and never let up.  If he does this, he wins a wide decision. 
     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Dec. 9, 2009 - 3:01 PM ET #13

    I will wait to see the weigh ins, and how Paulie looks, if he looks like he's coming for a pay check I will not play either side.

    Danno & Mack make excellent points, enough to possibly make it a NO GO for me on Paulie, but I need to see Paulie's shape and how amped up he is for this fight.

    Tough to look past .. that if Diaz wins.. Marquez II is a huge payday and good fight for us fans.

    Walk did point out one thing.. which is not normal for Paulie.. he's the BIGGER GUY. I believe that's why he could take Diaz's punches in the first fight.

    He's fought at 147 before his natural weight is 140... so technically this pillow puncher is the bigger guy lol! :).

    I will see how each guy looks.. going into the fight... tough call.. everyone makes good points for both sides- Good work!
    Reply
    I will wait to see the weigh ins, and how Paulie looks, if he looks like he's coming for a pay check I will not play either side.

    Danno & Mack make excellent points, enough to possibly make it a NO GO for me on Paulie, but I need to see Paulie's shape and how amped up he is for this fight.

    Tough to look past .. that if Diaz wins.. Marquez II is a huge payday and good fight for us fans.

    Walk did point out one thing.. which is not normal for Paulie.. he's the BIGGER GUY. I believe that's why he could take Diaz's punches in the first fight.

    He's fought at 147 before his natural weight is 140... so technically this pillow puncher is the bigger guy lol! :).

    I will see how each guy looks.. going into the fight... tough call.. everyone makes good points for both sides- Good work!
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Dec. 9, 2009 - 6:19 PM ET #14

    Diaz isn't going to fight Marquez. Why get laid out like that again? I enjoyed the first fight but I'm pretty sure it would go down the same way.

    Diaz is starting to remind me of RIcky Hatton, but without the moderate pop.

    Reply

    Diaz isn't going to fight Marquez. Why get laid out like that again? I enjoyed the first fight but I'm pretty sure it would go down the same way.

    Diaz is starting to remind me of RIcky Hatton, but without the moderate pop.

     
    DatMofoThere85
    DatMofoThere85
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2008
    Posts: 349
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2009 - 2:45 AM ET #15

    Malignaggi is crap. Yes he's fast, but with the exception of his jab, what else does he have? The man predictably moves to his left while throwing the jab and he has no right hand to speak of. Diaz recognizes this now and instead of trying to jab with the jabber (not the best idea when your slower with the shorter reach, but I understand the technique), he'll utilize more head movement and throw lead rights to cut off the ring. Once inside Malignaggi will try to hold but Diaz is gonna raise hell before Maliggnagi can hold. Malignaggi will begin to see the pattern so Diaz will begin to utilize feints (after he takes Malignaggi's nuts) and Diaz will also sometimes change angles (see Katsidis fight) when Malignaggi tries to hold. Speed will always trouble Juan (especially early), but Malignaggi's tactics of running and holding will not benifit him on the scorecards. Diaz by close dec. I'm broke (not because of gambling - I'm unemployed) and still playing it big! Laterz.

    P.S.

    You can't call the first fight a robbery. It was close. But I will admit Gale Van Hoy messed up big time.

    Reply

    Malignaggi is crap. Yes he's fast, but with the exception of his jab, what else does he have? The man predictably moves to his left while throwing the jab and he has no right hand to speak of. Diaz recognizes this now and instead of trying to jab with the jabber (not the best idea when your slower with the shorter reach, but I understand the technique), he'll utilize more head movement and throw lead rights to cut off the ring. Once inside Malignaggi will try to hold but Diaz is gonna raise hell before Maliggnagi can hold. Malignaggi will begin to see the pattern so Diaz will begin to utilize feints (after he takes Malignaggi's nuts) and Diaz will also sometimes change angles (see Katsidis fight) when Malignaggi tries to hold. Speed will always trouble Juan (especially early), but Malignaggi's tactics of running and holding will not benifit him on the scorecards. Diaz by close dec. I'm broke (not because of gambling - I'm unemployed) and still playing it big! Laterz.

    P.S.

    You can't call the first fight a robbery. It was close. But I will admit Gale Van Hoy messed up big time.

     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2009 - 4:51 AM ET #16

    Quote Originally Posted by DatMofoThere85:

    Malignaggi is crap. Yes he's fast, but with the exception of his jab, what else does he have? The man predictably moves to his left while throwing the jab and he has no right hand to speak of. Diaz recognizes this now and instead of trying to jab with the jabber (not the best idea when your slower with the shorter reach, but I understand the technique), he'll utilize more head movement and throw lead rights to cut off the ring. Once inside Malignaggi will try to hold but Diaz is gonna raise hell before Maliggnagi can hold. Malignaggi will begin to see the pattern so Diaz will begin to utilize feints (after he takes Malignaggi's nuts) and Diaz will also sometimes change angles (see Katsidis fight) when Malignaggi tries to hold. Speed will always trouble Juan (especially early), but Malignaggi's tactics of running and holding will not benifit him on the scorecards. Diaz by close dec. I'm broke (not because of gambling - I'm unemployed) and still playing it big! Laterz.

    P.S.

    You can't call the first fight a robbery. It was close. But I will admit Gale Van Hoy messed up big time.

    That would be great if Juan was some sort of tactical wizard. However, he is not.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by DatMofoThere85:

    Malignaggi is crap. Yes he's fast, but with the exception of his jab, what else does he have? The man predictably moves to his left while throwing the jab and he has no right hand to speak of. Diaz recognizes this now and instead of trying to jab with the jabber (not the best idea when your slower with the shorter reach, but I understand the technique), he'll utilize more head movement and throw lead rights to cut off the ring. Once inside Malignaggi will try to hold but Diaz is gonna raise hell before Maliggnagi can hold. Malignaggi will begin to see the pattern so Diaz will begin to utilize feints (after he takes Malignaggi's nuts) and Diaz will also sometimes change angles (see Katsidis fight) when Malignaggi tries to hold. Speed will always trouble Juan (especially early), but Malignaggi's tactics of running and holding will not benifit him on the scorecards. Diaz by close dec. I'm broke (not because of gambling - I'm unemployed) and still playing it big! Laterz.

    P.S.

    You can't call the first fight a robbery. It was close. But I will admit Gale Van Hoy messed up big time.

    That would be great if Juan was some sort of tactical wizard. However, he is not.

     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2009 - 1:24 PM ET #17

    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

    Diaz isn't going to fight Marquez. Why get laid out like that again? I enjoyed the first fight but I'm pretty sure it would go down the same way.

    Diaz is starting to remind me of RIcky Hatton, but without the moderate pop.



    Easily.. MONEY, his career is pretty much over, he can make an amazing Pay Day fighting Marquez.

    I agree Marquez would do a lot better this time, but it would still be entertaining as Marquez takes time to warm up like a car in the winter, hence why Diaz looked good the first 4 rounds.

    They will exchange and Marquez can easily KO him in the latter rounds..
    BUT Marquez has two fights left in my eyes.. he can wait and fight Pac-man if Pac-man loses to Mayweather.

     (assuming Pac-man even keeps on boxing after that)...

    Or he can fight Diaz which is a decent payday for him, it was one of the best fights of the year before Martinez/Williams.. why not do it again?

    It makes sense $$$ wise for both men. I know Marquez desperately wants Pac-man, but he may never face him in the ring again.

    Take the money and fight Diaz :-)      
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

    Diaz isn't going to fight Marquez. Why get laid out like that again? I enjoyed the first fight but I'm pretty sure it would go down the same way.

    Diaz is starting to remind me of RIcky Hatton, but without the moderate pop.



    Easily.. MONEY, his career is pretty much over, he can make an amazing Pay Day fighting Marquez.

    I agree Marquez would do a lot better this time, but it would still be entertaining as Marquez takes time to warm up like a car in the winter, hence why Diaz looked good the first 4 rounds.

    They will exchange and Marquez can easily KO him in the latter rounds..
    BUT Marquez has two fights left in my eyes.. he can wait and fight Pac-man if Pac-man loses to Mayweather.

     (assuming Pac-man even keeps on boxing after that)...

    Or he can fight Diaz which is a decent payday for him, it was one of the best fights of the year before Martinez/Williams.. why not do it again?

    It makes sense $$$ wise for both men. I know Marquez desperately wants Pac-man, but he may never face him in the ring again.

    Take the money and fight Diaz :-)      
     
    DatMofoThere85
    DatMofoThere85
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2008
    Posts: 349
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2009 - 5:43 PM ET #18

    People don't realize Malignaggi is a scared little BITCH with no nuts! He doesn't throw his punches with conviction even if he knows its gonna land. Overall though I think Malignaggi looked as good as he can in the first fight and I know Diaz can look better. Diaz is bringin it this time trust me.
    Reply
    People don't realize Malignaggi is a scared little BITCH with no nuts! He doesn't throw his punches with conviction even if he knows its gonna land. Overall though I think Malignaggi looked as good as he can in the first fight and I know Diaz can look better. Diaz is bringin it this time trust me.
     
    A2C
    A2C
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 5053
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2009 - 5:54 PM ET #19

    Quote Originally Posted by DatMofoThere85:

    People don't realize Malignaggi is a scared little BITCH with no nuts! He doesn't throw his punches with conviction even if he knows its gonna land. Overall though I think Malignaggi looked as good as he can in the first fight and I know Diaz can look better. Diaz is bringin it this time trust me.


    Crude analysis aside, I agree 100%.  
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by DatMofoThere85:

    People don't realize Malignaggi is a scared little BITCH with no nuts! He doesn't throw his punches with conviction even if he knows its gonna land. Overall though I think Malignaggi looked as good as he can in the first fight and I know Diaz can look better. Diaz is bringin it this time trust me.


    Crude analysis aside, I agree 100%.  
     
    DannoDanger
    DannoDanger
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2008
    Posts: 3554
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2009 - 10:25 PM ET #20

    Quote Originally Posted by nuttyrich:



    Easily.. MONEY, his career is pretty much over, he can make an amazing Pay Day fighting Marquez.

    I agree Marquez would do a lot better this time, but it would still be entertaining as Marquez takes time to warm up like a car in the winter, hence why Diaz looked good the first 4 rounds.

    They will exchange and Marquez can easily KO him in the latter rounds..
    BUT Marquez has two fights left in my eyes.. he can wait and fight Pac-man if Pac-man loses to Mayweather.

     (assuming Pac-man even keeps on boxing after that)...

    Or he can fight Diaz which is a decent payday for him, it was one of the best fights of the year before Martinez/Williams.. why not do it again?

    It makes sense $$$ wise for both men. I know Marquez desperately wants Pac-man, but he may never face him in the ring again.

    Take the money and fight Diaz :-)      

     

    Dan Rafael said that JMM/Hatton is likely for 2010.  Diaz said that he doesn't feel comfortable at 140, and plans on fighting at 135 after this fight.  I'd be surprised if JMM ever goes back down there.  It's tougher for older fighters to go back down the weight scale. 

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by nuttyrich:



    Easily.. MONEY, his career is pretty much over, he can make an amazing Pay Day fighting Marquez.

    I agree Marquez would do a lot better this time, but it would still be entertaining as Marquez takes time to warm up like a car in the winter, hence why Diaz looked good the first 4 rounds.

    They will exchange and Marquez can easily KO him in the latter rounds..
    BUT Marquez has two fights left in my eyes.. he can wait and fight Pac-man if Pac-man loses to Mayweather.

     (assuming Pac-man even keeps on boxing after that)...

    Or he can fight Diaz which is a decent payday for him, it was one of the best fights of the year before Martinez/Williams.. why not do it again?

    It makes sense $$$ wise for both men. I know Marquez desperately wants Pac-man, but he may never face him in the ring again.

    Take the money and fight Diaz :-)      

     

    Dan Rafael said that JMM/Hatton is likely for 2010.  Diaz said that he doesn't feel comfortable at 140, and plans on fighting at 135 after this fight.  I'd be surprised if JMM ever goes back down there.  It's tougher for older fighters to go back down the weight scale. 

     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Dec. 11, 2009 - 12:18 AM ET #21

    Quote Originally Posted by DannoDanger:

     

    Dan Rafael said that JMM/Hatton is likely for 2010.  Diaz said that he doesn't feel comfortable at 140, and plans on fighting at 135 after this fight.  I'd be surprised if JMM ever goes back down there.  It's tougher for older fighters to go back down the weight scale. 



    Ricky Hatton? He's about 225 now.. there is no way you mean Ricky Hatton, maybe Matthew Hatton?

    I think Marquez can easily go back being he had an amazingly hard time making weight to fight Floyd,  please not Ricky :( 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by DannoDanger:

     

    Dan Rafael said that JMM/Hatton is likely for 2010.  Diaz said that he doesn't feel comfortable at 140, and plans on fighting at 135 after this fight.  I'd be surprised if JMM ever goes back down there.  It's tougher for older fighters to go back down the weight scale. 



    Ricky Hatton? He's about 225 now.. there is no way you mean Ricky Hatton, maybe Matthew Hatton?

    I think Marquez can easily go back being he had an amazingly hard time making weight to fight Floyd,  please not Ricky :( 
     
    KineProfessor
    KineProfessor
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 4619
    Posted: Dec. 11, 2009 - 2:05 AM ET #22

    Couldn't agree more walktheline, this is a big play for me
    Reply
    Couldn't agree more walktheline, this is a big play for me
     
    LBCWeasie
    LBCWeasie
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 3379
    Posted: Dec. 12, 2009 - 7:13 AM ET #23

    Reply
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Dec. 12, 2009 - 12:10 PM ET #24

    Adding: Victor Oritz ITD/BJ Penn, 2 units to win 1.73
    Reply
    Adding: Victor Oritz ITD/BJ Penn, 2 units to win 1.73
     
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Dec. 12, 2009 - 12:11 PM ET #25

    Adding: Victor Oritz ITD/BJ Penn, 2 units to win 1.73
    Reply
    Adding: Victor Oritz ITD/BJ Penn, 2 units to win 1.73
    All Forums | Boxing
    12 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Claiming Prizes 57,789
    • Tuesday 10/20/2026 860
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,136
    • Congrats to ltdsks - 20 wins in a row! 5,071
    • PART DEUX 137
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,278
    • Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity 33,163
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 26,077
    • NCAA WEEK 8. (( 151 )) 2,451
    • How low can Trump go ? 29,774

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.