• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NBA Opening Night
      NBA Opening Night
      • NBA Odds
      • NBA Picks
      • Thunder-Spurs Picks
      • NBA Prediction Markets
      • NBA Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Boxing

    Chambers/Peter - It's Simple...

    12 Next Last»
    walktheline
    punchmaster
    EricLinny
    Popo21
    MarlonB
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 1260
    Posts: 40
    12 Next Last»
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Mar. 25, 2009 - 4:05 AM ET #1

    Peter is going to knock out "fast" Eddie out in very dramatic fashion. Zero doubt.

    Why? I could go on and on, but it's very simple. Peter will walk through the superior boxer and land big shots, taking the will out of  Chambers. Eddie will attempt to survive, but I doubt he will. I don't understand the debate here - this one is over before it starts.

     This isn't just a fight I have an opinion on. This is one of the strongest plays in recent memory.
    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    Peter is going to knock out "fast" Eddie out in very dramatic fashion. Zero doubt.

    Why? I could go on and on, but it's very simple. Peter will walk through the superior boxer and land big shots, taking the will out of  Chambers. Eddie will attempt to survive, but I doubt he will. I don't understand the debate here - this one is over before it starts.

     This isn't just a fight I have an opinion on. This is one of the strongest plays in recent memory.
     
    punchmaster
    punchmaster
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 78
    Posted: Mar. 25, 2009 - 2:21 PM ET #2

    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

    Peter is going to knock out "fast" Eddie out in very dramatic fashion. Zero doubt.

    Why? I could go on and on, but it's very simple. Peter will walk through the superior boxer and land big shots, taking the will out of  Chambers. Eddie will attempt to survive, but I doubt he will. I don't understand the debate here - this one is over before it starts.

     This isn't just a fight I have an opinion on. This is one of the strongest plays in recent memory.

    Aww,   I don't think it's that simple.  If your spot on, of course you get all the credit.   "Strongest plays in recent memory".    Bold prediction.         

    Don't you at least want to see the weights?    Could Peter be a tad bit down from the pasting he took in October, thus sending him to the buffet line a bit extra.         I wasn't so shocked to see Peter wobbled by the Vlad left hook in the 12th back in 05, but 3 times to the deck against mental midget McCline did suprise me.    Size wise, sure Chambers is nothing like those 3 giants who damaged Peter but I could see the should be cruiser doing a paint job on Peter's face with those fast accurate hands.     If Peter's questionable stamina is not there too keep bringing it like Povetkin did,   Chambers should get by.  No indication of a chin problem with Eddie.   

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

    Peter is going to knock out "fast" Eddie out in very dramatic fashion. Zero doubt.

    Why? I could go on and on, but it's very simple. Peter will walk through the superior boxer and land big shots, taking the will out of  Chambers. Eddie will attempt to survive, but I doubt he will. I don't understand the debate here - this one is over before it starts.

     This isn't just a fight I have an opinion on. This is one of the strongest plays in recent memory.

    Aww,   I don't think it's that simple.  If your spot on, of course you get all the credit.   "Strongest plays in recent memory".    Bold prediction.         

    Don't you at least want to see the weights?    Could Peter be a tad bit down from the pasting he took in October, thus sending him to the buffet line a bit extra.         I wasn't so shocked to see Peter wobbled by the Vlad left hook in the 12th back in 05, but 3 times to the deck against mental midget McCline did suprise me.    Size wise, sure Chambers is nothing like those 3 giants who damaged Peter but I could see the should be cruiser doing a paint job on Peter's face with those fast accurate hands.     If Peter's questionable stamina is not there too keep bringing it like Povetkin did,   Chambers should get by.  No indication of a chin problem with Eddie.   

     
    EricLinny
    EricLinny
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2009
    Posts: 5068
    Posted: Mar. 25, 2009 - 3:00 PM ET #3

    I don't understand the debate here - this one is over before it starts.

    Are you trying to compare the Sam Peter of four years ago to the Sam Peter of today?  As in, four years after he KTFO Jeremy Williams?

    Since that fight, Peter has come in averaging over 250 pounds, with the exception of the Wladimir Klitschko fight, and we all know how that turned out. Sure he had him down, but the superior fighter ended up taking the win.  With two fights with Toney under his belt and a vicious beating agsinst Vitali Klitschkowhere where he esentially quit, I don't see the same 24 year old Sam Peter that the media is trying to build as a title contender.  Doe he still have it in him?  I'm betting no, but I have been wrong before. 

    Why does anyone think he is going to come in to this fight in the best shape of his life?  I could be wrong, but I see him coming in at anywhere from 245 and up, while Chambers has never crosed the 220 pound barrier.  Styles make fights, and this one has the potential to make Eddie Chambers look like the superior fighter.   

    Good Luck regrdless, but my money is on the hingrier, better managed future title contender.
    Reply
    I don't understand the debate here - this one is over before it starts.

    Are you trying to compare the Sam Peter of four years ago to the Sam Peter of today?  As in, four years after he KTFO Jeremy Williams?

    Since that fight, Peter has come in averaging over 250 pounds, with the exception of the Wladimir Klitschko fight, and we all know how that turned out. Sure he had him down, but the superior fighter ended up taking the win.  With two fights with Toney under his belt and a vicious beating agsinst Vitali Klitschkowhere where he esentially quit, I don't see the same 24 year old Sam Peter that the media is trying to build as a title contender.  Doe he still have it in him?  I'm betting no, but I have been wrong before. 

    Why does anyone think he is going to come in to this fight in the best shape of his life?  I could be wrong, but I see him coming in at anywhere from 245 and up, while Chambers has never crosed the 220 pound barrier.  Styles make fights, and this one has the potential to make Eddie Chambers look like the superior fighter.   

    Good Luck regrdless, but my money is on the hingrier, better managed future title contender.
     
    EricLinny
    EricLinny
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2009
    Posts: 5068
    Posted: Mar. 25, 2009 - 3:02 PM ET #4

    "Strongest plays in recent memory"

    Beat me to the punch...ballsy statement there..
    Reply
    "Strongest plays in recent memory"

    Beat me to the punch...ballsy statement there..
     
    Popo21
    Popo21
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 2362
    Posted: Mar. 25, 2009 - 3:38 PM ET #5

    I don't think that a judgement can be made until the weigh-ins...if Peter comes in anything like his last few fights then Eddie will be way too fast for him, especially after the 6th round. But if Peter comes in in decent shape then he will have a chance to knock him out.
     
    I'm really starting to like Chambers in a decision here, I think hes smart enough to not get into a brawl with Peter and use his speed to win on points.
    Reply
    I don't think that a judgement can be made until the weigh-ins...if Peter comes in anything like his last few fights then Eddie will be way too fast for him, especially after the 6th round. But if Peter comes in in decent shape then he will have a chance to knock him out.
     
    I'm really starting to like Chambers in a decision here, I think hes smart enough to not get into a brawl with Peter and use his speed to win on points.
     
    MarlonB
    MarlonB
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2009
    Posts: 483
    Posted: Mar. 25, 2009 - 7:27 PM ET #6

    If your'e taking SAMUEL PETER, do yourself a favor and read this:

    This time last year, Samuel Peter was still being talked about as a potential heavyweight superstar. Although he struggled for five rounds against Oleg Maskaev he ended the fight in emphatic fashion in the sixth. “I liked the fact that when he had him hurt, he didn’t get excited this time, he placed every punch — very good, professional finish,” Emanuel Steward commented on HBO.

    Then things went about as wrong as they could get when Peter was outclassed and hammered into submission in eight rounds by Vitali Klitschko last October.

    Peter looked like a novice in that fight, swinging and missing and unable to get out of the way of punches. About the only thing that could be seen as a positive was that he stayed on his feet.

    On Friday, Peter will attempt to get his career back on the right track when he meets Eddie Chambers in a 10-rounder on Friday Night Fights.

    Peter opened up as a favourite but the betting public has been piling in on Chambers ever since wagering lines were posted and on Friday the so-called “Nigerian Nightmare” will enter the ring as a definite underdog.

    I know that a fighter shouldn’t be written off on the evidence of one fight, but Peter took the sort of beating from Klitschko that could be damaging mentally as much as physically.

    Usually a fighter would come back in a fairly undemanding sort of fight after a defeat such as that, but Peter’s people are rolling the dice here because Chambers is a skilled, ambitious heavyweight with a lot of confidence.

    Peter is only 28, young for a heavyweight, but he has not been looking impressive lately. It now appears that he might have peaked when he easily outpointed James Toney in their rematch two years ago.

    In his next bout, Peter had to survive three knockdowns to eke out a win over Jameel McCline. He gave a plodding sort of performance against the 39-year-old Maskaev before landing some big punches in the sixth round, and then came the beatdown against Klitschko.

    Peter will need to be back to his best — or something approaching it — to win on Friday, but I know I am not alone in wondering if his heart is really in boxing any more. On Friday we will find out.

    Chambers, 26, also has something to prove because in his biggest fight he allowed himself to be outworked and outpointed by the unbeaten Alexander Povetkin after making a promising start against the unbeaten Russian.

    I understand that Chambers is well aware that he let himself down that night and is determined to make amends. He blames complacency for the loss to Povetkin. It appears that he thought he could coast home after looking sharp in the early rounds. Povetkin, meanwhile, increased his own punch output. As Chambers told reporter Robert Morales of the Los Angeles Daily News: “He turned it on and I turned it down,” which sums it up rather well.

    Chambers had previously shown a tendency to ease back, though, when he almost blew the decision against the harder-working Calvin Brock. It is one thing for a fighter to pace himself, and quite another to throw so few punches that he lets the other man back into the fight. Chambers does have a tendency to cover up for quite long periods, catching punches on the arms and gloves before letting his own shots go. He will need to make sure there is not too much time between his bursts of activity in Friday’s fight.

    Peter is the puncher in the fight, but I think he is going to have trouble getting past Chambers’s defensive shield. Also, Peter is not a high-volume puncher so there is unlikely to be a similar situation as the one that arose in Germany when Povetkin was simply swamping Chambers with a high level of activity. I can envisage Peter getting frustrated at not being able to get a clear shot at Chambers’s chin and being rattled by quick, crisp punches when his opponent opens up. Although Chambers doesn’t do a lot of moving around the ring he does have excellent hand speed, and in this respect his “Fast Eddie” nickname is appropriate.

    At least Peter is meeting a heavyweight roughly the same height as himself this time and not one who towers over him the way that Klitschko did, but Chambers’s defence and rapid punch-delivery could make this an equally unfavourable style match-up for him.

    I think that Peter’s best strategy would be to use his left jab, which is an excellent weapon, and try to control Chambers on the end of the left hand rather than attempting to blast him out of the fight. If Peter jabs steadily, throws his punches in a measured way and goes to the body every so often with big, whacking right hands — much the same tactics he used in the rematch with Toney — he can win rounds and perhaps outpoint Chambers. I am not sure, though, if Peter can ever reproduce the form of that best-ever showing. Something seems to have gone out of him.

    Chambers, though, is only a slight favourite for me. He has already let one winnable fight completely get away from him, and it could happen again at any time. I don’t think it will happen on Friday, though. I’m taking Chambers to win clearly on points.

    Reply

    If your'e taking SAMUEL PETER, do yourself a favor and read this:

    This time last year, Samuel Peter was still being talked about as a potential heavyweight superstar. Although he struggled for five rounds against Oleg Maskaev he ended the fight in emphatic fashion in the sixth. “I liked the fact that when he had him hurt, he didn’t get excited this time, he placed every punch — very good, professional finish,” Emanuel Steward commented on HBO.

    Then things went about as wrong as they could get when Peter was outclassed and hammered into submission in eight rounds by Vitali Klitschko last October.

    Peter looked like a novice in that fight, swinging and missing and unable to get out of the way of punches. About the only thing that could be seen as a positive was that he stayed on his feet.

    On Friday, Peter will attempt to get his career back on the right track when he meets Eddie Chambers in a 10-rounder on Friday Night Fights.

    Peter opened up as a favourite but the betting public has been piling in on Chambers ever since wagering lines were posted and on Friday the so-called “Nigerian Nightmare” will enter the ring as a definite underdog.

    I know that a fighter shouldn’t be written off on the evidence of one fight, but Peter took the sort of beating from Klitschko that could be damaging mentally as much as physically.

    Usually a fighter would come back in a fairly undemanding sort of fight after a defeat such as that, but Peter’s people are rolling the dice here because Chambers is a skilled, ambitious heavyweight with a lot of confidence.

    Peter is only 28, young for a heavyweight, but he has not been looking impressive lately. It now appears that he might have peaked when he easily outpointed James Toney in their rematch two years ago.

    In his next bout, Peter had to survive three knockdowns to eke out a win over Jameel McCline. He gave a plodding sort of performance against the 39-year-old Maskaev before landing some big punches in the sixth round, and then came the beatdown against Klitschko.

    Peter will need to be back to his best — or something approaching it — to win on Friday, but I know I am not alone in wondering if his heart is really in boxing any more. On Friday we will find out.

    Chambers, 26, also has something to prove because in his biggest fight he allowed himself to be outworked and outpointed by the unbeaten Alexander Povetkin after making a promising start against the unbeaten Russian.

    I understand that Chambers is well aware that he let himself down that night and is determined to make amends. He blames complacency for the loss to Povetkin. It appears that he thought he could coast home after looking sharp in the early rounds. Povetkin, meanwhile, increased his own punch output. As Chambers told reporter Robert Morales of the Los Angeles Daily News: “He turned it on and I turned it down,” which sums it up rather well.

    Chambers had previously shown a tendency to ease back, though, when he almost blew the decision against the harder-working Calvin Brock. It is one thing for a fighter to pace himself, and quite another to throw so few punches that he lets the other man back into the fight. Chambers does have a tendency to cover up for quite long periods, catching punches on the arms and gloves before letting his own shots go. He will need to make sure there is not too much time between his bursts of activity in Friday’s fight.

    Peter is the puncher in the fight, but I think he is going to have trouble getting past Chambers’s defensive shield. Also, Peter is not a high-volume puncher so there is unlikely to be a similar situation as the one that arose in Germany when Povetkin was simply swamping Chambers with a high level of activity. I can envisage Peter getting frustrated at not being able to get a clear shot at Chambers’s chin and being rattled by quick, crisp punches when his opponent opens up. Although Chambers doesn’t do a lot of moving around the ring he does have excellent hand speed, and in this respect his “Fast Eddie” nickname is appropriate.

    At least Peter is meeting a heavyweight roughly the same height as himself this time and not one who towers over him the way that Klitschko did, but Chambers’s defence and rapid punch-delivery could make this an equally unfavourable style match-up for him.

    I think that Peter’s best strategy would be to use his left jab, which is an excellent weapon, and try to control Chambers on the end of the left hand rather than attempting to blast him out of the fight. If Peter jabs steadily, throws his punches in a measured way and goes to the body every so often with big, whacking right hands — much the same tactics he used in the rematch with Toney — he can win rounds and perhaps outpoint Chambers. I am not sure, though, if Peter can ever reproduce the form of that best-ever showing. Something seems to have gone out of him.

    Chambers, though, is only a slight favourite for me. He has already let one winnable fight completely get away from him, and it could happen again at any time. I don’t think it will happen on Friday, though. I’m taking Chambers to win clearly on points.

     
    A2C
    A2C
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 5053
    Posted: Mar. 25, 2009 - 9:21 PM ET #7

    The above should be attributed to Graham Houston, who authors the excellent fightwriter.com site. 

    Reply
    The above should be attributed to Graham Houston, who authors the excellent fightwriter.com site. 

     
    Zumbize
    Zumbize
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 668
    Posted: Mar. 25, 2009 - 9:33 PM ET #8

    How big of a play are you making on Sam walk?
    Reply
    How big of a play are you making on Sam walk?
     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Mar. 25, 2009 - 9:47 PM ET #9

    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

    Peter is going to knock out "fast" Eddie out in very dramatic fashion. Zero doubt.

    Why? I could go on and on, but it's very simple. Peter will walk through the superior boxer and land big shots, taking the will out of  Chambers. Eddie will attempt to survive, but I doubt he will. I don't understand the debate here - this one is over before it starts.

     This isn't just a fight I have an opinion on. This is one of the strongest plays in recent memory.


    Well hopefully you have a brief case of amnesia if this is one of the strongest plays in recent history lol!

    I give you credit I wish you the best with this pick, but remember James Toney really beat him the first time, Jamel Mckline truly beat him I (had him down 3 times). And Klitcho destroyed him.

    Eddie Chambers is NO walk over. He's not world champ either, it's why their fighting on ESPN.

    I don't have an opinion on this fight to be honest, Sam Peter is a guy I would never wager on, whatever mental frame he comes in is how he fights, and that's not a "money fighter" because he can come in looking amazing, or look like a old fat slob.

    My pick would be to stay away, but if I had $1 on Eddie Chambers.

    Again this POST is not to RUB you the wrong way, this is my opinion as you have yours. I applaud you but watch that weigh in before plucking down big $$ on Peter.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

    Peter is going to knock out "fast" Eddie out in very dramatic fashion. Zero doubt.

    Why? I could go on and on, but it's very simple. Peter will walk through the superior boxer and land big shots, taking the will out of  Chambers. Eddie will attempt to survive, but I doubt he will. I don't understand the debate here - this one is over before it starts.

     This isn't just a fight I have an opinion on. This is one of the strongest plays in recent memory.


    Well hopefully you have a brief case of amnesia if this is one of the strongest plays in recent history lol!

    I give you credit I wish you the best with this pick, but remember James Toney really beat him the first time, Jamel Mckline truly beat him I (had him down 3 times). And Klitcho destroyed him.

    Eddie Chambers is NO walk over. He's not world champ either, it's why their fighting on ESPN.

    I don't have an opinion on this fight to be honest, Sam Peter is a guy I would never wager on, whatever mental frame he comes in is how he fights, and that's not a "money fighter" because he can come in looking amazing, or look like a old fat slob.

    My pick would be to stay away, but if I had $1 on Eddie Chambers.

    Again this POST is not to RUB you the wrong way, this is my opinion as you have yours. I applaud you but watch that weigh in before plucking down big $$ on Peter.
     
    ghostkid
    ghostkid
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 643
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2009 - 12:23 AM ET #10

    Thank You A2C for giving credit where credit is due.
    If you reprint an article from somewhere, give the author credit.
    Graham works hard on these write-ups each week.

    Good looking out A2C.

    Reply
    Thank You A2C for giving credit where credit is due.
    If you reprint an article from somewhere, give the author credit.
    Graham works hard on these write-ups each week.

    Good looking out A2C.

     
    MarlonB
    MarlonB
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2009
    Posts: 483
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2009 - 4:05 PM ET #11

    Quote Originally Posted by ghostkid:

    Thank You A2C for giving credit where credit is due.
    If you reprint an article from somewhere, give the author credit.
    Graham works hard on these write-ups each week.

    Good looking out A2C.

    This is a boxing thread, everyone knows who wrote it, besides I said READ it.  Pay attention.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by ghostkid:

    Thank You A2C for giving credit where credit is due.
    If you reprint an article from somewhere, give the author credit.
    Graham works hard on these write-ups each week.

    Good looking out A2C.

    This is a boxing thread, everyone knows who wrote it, besides I said READ it.  Pay attention.

     
    DodgerBluFitted
    DodgerBluFitted
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 143
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2009 - 6:27 PM ET #12

    People talk down on Peter too much. Dude has 2 losses..To who? the number 1 and 2 Heavyweights in the world. Give him a break. This is a gift!

    Peter +105 to the bank
    Reply
    People talk down on Peter too much. Dude has 2 losses..To who? the number 1 and 2 Heavyweights in the world. Give him a break. This is a gift!

    Peter +105 to the bank
     
    DannoDanger
    DannoDanger
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2008
    Posts: 3554
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2009 - 6:29 PM ET #13

    Peter is in the worst shape of his life.  He looks like CC Sabathia.
    Reply
    Peter is in the worst shape of his life.  He looks like CC Sabathia.
     
    DannoDanger
    DannoDanger
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2008
    Posts: 3554
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2009 - 6:42 PM ET #14

    Just reading Sam Peters chat on ESPN.com (https://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=25649).
     
    He's fooling himself:
     
    Steve Nagle: How has your training camp gone? Would you say you are in great shape? Are you properly prepared for Chambers?

    Samuel Peter: Yes. I am in great shape.
    Reply
    Just reading Sam Peters chat on ESPN.com (https://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=25649).
     
    He's fooling himself:
     
    Steve Nagle: How has your training camp gone? Would you say you are in great shape? Are you properly prepared for Chambers?

    Samuel Peter: Yes. I am in great shape.
     
    capmaster2000
    capmaster2000
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 423
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2009 - 10:19 PM ET #15

    i actually think eddie chambers is the strongest play i''ve seen in a while, i'm surprised he opened as nearly a 2:1 dog.  people rant and rave about peter's power but he has 2 ko's in his last 8 fights...old maskeav and julius long (14-7 at fight time).   this will be a ud for chambers.  i've heard some talk of chambers possibly ko'n peter?  i don't think so...he just got hammered by vitali for 9 before he quit.  chambers is no vitali.
    Reply
    i actually think eddie chambers is the strongest play i''ve seen in a while, i'm surprised he opened as nearly a 2:1 dog.  people rant and rave about peter's power but he has 2 ko's in his last 8 fights...old maskeav and julius long (14-7 at fight time).   this will be a ud for chambers.  i've heard some talk of chambers possibly ko'n peter?  i don't think so...he just got hammered by vitali for 9 before he quit.  chambers is no vitali.
     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2009 - 10:56 PM ET #16

    Quote Originally Posted by DannoDanger:

    Just reading Sam Peters chat on ESPN.com (https://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=25649).
     
    He's fooling himself:
     
    Steve Nagle: How has your training camp gone? Would you say you are in great shape? Are you properly prepared for Chambers?

    Samuel Peter: Yes. I am in great shape.


    I remember when he fought James Toney the first time, (which I and most people know TONEY won easily)! Yes Peter won the rematch easy but Toney won that first fight. Okay onto that fight well he predicted a knockout by the 4th round, guess what James Toney rolls punches better than anyone, after round 4 SAM Peter was GASSED I think he was only 23 at the time, he didn't even spar!

    Peter was  lucky he got a second wind, later in the fight, but he lost that fight also but they gave him the win because he was the best American Heavyweight at the time and Toney had no where to go as he isn't a natural heavyweight and was past his prime.

    This is Sam Peter's THIRD time on ESPN, the last one was to get a K.O on TV so he can get another big fight, now after 2 horrible showings in a row (Mccline decked him 3 times and won, but got robbed) and Klitcho well possibly worst heavy weight display I've ever seen, looked like he wanted to leave when the bell started.

    Sam has had many shots for titles, ESPN doesn't pay a ton, it's just a platform to show America what you have, then you get a big pay day.

    Sam peter hasn't been in great shape for years, Mccline showed if you nail him with even a weak upper cut, he will fall.

    If Eddie Chambers nails him with an uppercut even though he isn't a power puncher, SAM will QUIT.

    This is the Eddie Chamber coming out Party, even though he is no great champion, Peter has fought for the title a few times and will NOT get another shot.

    Third time is a charm, two times he used ESPN to make make for future fights, this time ESPN ends his career.




    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by DannoDanger:

    Just reading Sam Peters chat on ESPN.com (https://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=25649).
     
    He's fooling himself:
     
    Steve Nagle: How has your training camp gone? Would you say you are in great shape? Are you properly prepared for Chambers?

    Samuel Peter: Yes. I am in great shape.


    I remember when he fought James Toney the first time, (which I and most people know TONEY won easily)! Yes Peter won the rematch easy but Toney won that first fight. Okay onto that fight well he predicted a knockout by the 4th round, guess what James Toney rolls punches better than anyone, after round 4 SAM Peter was GASSED I think he was only 23 at the time, he didn't even spar!

    Peter was  lucky he got a second wind, later in the fight, but he lost that fight also but they gave him the win because he was the best American Heavyweight at the time and Toney had no where to go as he isn't a natural heavyweight and was past his prime.

    This is Sam Peter's THIRD time on ESPN, the last one was to get a K.O on TV so he can get another big fight, now after 2 horrible showings in a row (Mccline decked him 3 times and won, but got robbed) and Klitcho well possibly worst heavy weight display I've ever seen, looked like he wanted to leave when the bell started.

    Sam has had many shots for titles, ESPN doesn't pay a ton, it's just a platform to show America what you have, then you get a big pay day.

    Sam peter hasn't been in great shape for years, Mccline showed if you nail him with even a weak upper cut, he will fall.

    If Eddie Chambers nails him with an uppercut even though he isn't a power puncher, SAM will QUIT.

    This is the Eddie Chamber coming out Party, even though he is no great champion, Peter has fought for the title a few times and will NOT get another shot.

    Third time is a charm, two times he used ESPN to make make for future fights, this time ESPN ends his career.




     
    capmaster2000
    capmaster2000
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 423
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2009 - 4:19 AM ET #17

    Quote Originally Posted by MarlonB:

    This is a boxing thread, everyone knows who wrote it, besides I said READ it.  Pay attention.



    not every single person who reads this site knows of gh or about his site, but even if they did, show some respect for the person who writes something.  just post a link to the article if you're going to use the entire article, or at least leave the name of the author at the bottom of the paste.

    talkin' like you're going to listen, but i doubt it.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by MarlonB:

    This is a boxing thread, everyone knows who wrote it, besides I said READ it.  Pay attention.



    not every single person who reads this site knows of gh or about his site, but even if they did, show some respect for the person who writes something.  just post a link to the article if you're going to use the entire article, or at least leave the name of the author at the bottom of the paste.

    talkin' like you're going to listen, but i doubt it.
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2009 - 4:23 AM ET #18

    Quote Originally Posted by capmaster2000:



    not every single person who reads this site knows of gh or about his site, but even if they did, show some respect for the person who writes something.  just post a link to the article if you're going to use the entire article, or at least leave the name of the author at the bottom of the paste.

    talkin' like you're going to listen, but i doubt it.

    I agree. I see tons of shit that is taken from other people that put the work in and get zero credit for the post. Give credit when someone else does the work.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by capmaster2000:



    not every single person who reads this site knows of gh or about his site, but even if they did, show some respect for the person who writes something.  just post a link to the article if you're going to use the entire article, or at least leave the name of the author at the bottom of the paste.

    talkin' like you're going to listen, but i doubt it.

    I agree. I see tons of shit that is taken from other people that put the work in and get zero credit for the post. Give credit when someone else does the work.

     
    capmaster2000
    capmaster2000
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 423
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2009 - 4:29 AM ET #19

    Quote Originally Posted by nuttyrich:



    I remember when he fought James Toney the first time, (which I and most people know TONEY won easily)! Yes Peter won the rematch easy but Toney won that first fight. Okay onto that fight well he predicted a knockout by the 4th round, guess what James Toney rolls punches better than anyone, after round 4 SAM Peter was GASSED I think he was only 23 at the time, he didn't even spar!

    Peter was  lucky he got a second wind, later in the fight, but he lost that fight also but they gave him the win because he was the best American Heavyweight at the time and Toney had no where to go as he isn't a natural heavyweight and was past his prime.

    This is Sam Peter's THIRD time on ESPN, the last one was to get a K.O on TV so he can get another big fight, now after 2 horrible showings in a row (Mccline decked him 3 times and won, but got robbed) and Klitcho well possibly worst heavy weight display I've ever seen, looked like he wanted to leave when the bell started.

    Sam has had many shots for titles, ESPN doesn't pay a ton, it's just a platform to show America what you have, then you get a big pay day.

    Sam peter hasn't been in great shape for years, Mccline showed if you nail him with even a weak upper cut, he will fall.

    If Eddie Chambers nails him with an uppercut even though he isn't a power puncher, SAM will QUIT.

    This is the Eddie Chamber coming out Party, even though he is no great champion, Peter has fought for the title a few times and will NOT get another shot.

    Third time is a charm, two times he used ESPN to make make for future fights, this time ESPN ends his career.


    which is it...this "isn't a bettable fight" and "stay away", or is it "eddie's coming out party" and the "end of sam peter's career"
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by nuttyrich:



    I remember when he fought James Toney the first time, (which I and most people know TONEY won easily)! Yes Peter won the rematch easy but Toney won that first fight. Okay onto that fight well he predicted a knockout by the 4th round, guess what James Toney rolls punches better than anyone, after round 4 SAM Peter was GASSED I think he was only 23 at the time, he didn't even spar!

    Peter was  lucky he got a second wind, later in the fight, but he lost that fight also but they gave him the win because he was the best American Heavyweight at the time and Toney had no where to go as he isn't a natural heavyweight and was past his prime.

    This is Sam Peter's THIRD time on ESPN, the last one was to get a K.O on TV so he can get another big fight, now after 2 horrible showings in a row (Mccline decked him 3 times and won, but got robbed) and Klitcho well possibly worst heavy weight display I've ever seen, looked like he wanted to leave when the bell started.

    Sam has had many shots for titles, ESPN doesn't pay a ton, it's just a platform to show America what you have, then you get a big pay day.

    Sam peter hasn't been in great shape for years, Mccline showed if you nail him with even a weak upper cut, he will fall.

    If Eddie Chambers nails him with an uppercut even though he isn't a power puncher, SAM will QUIT.

    This is the Eddie Chamber coming out Party, even though he is no great champion, Peter has fought for the title a few times and will NOT get another shot.

    Third time is a charm, two times he used ESPN to make make for future fights, this time ESPN ends his career.


    which is it...this "isn't a bettable fight" and "stay away", or is it "eddie's coming out party" and the "end of sam peter's career"
     
    Coweringbeef
    Coweringbeef
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 223
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2009 - 5:18 AM ET #20

    Is there a need for three threads on Peter v Chambers?
     
    Anyway Sam is too fat.
    Reply
    Is there a need for three threads on Peter v Chambers?
     
    Anyway Sam is too fat.
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2009 - 5:25 AM ET #21

    Quote Originally Posted by Coweringbeef:

    Is there a need for three threads on Peter v Chambers?
     
    Anyway Sam is too fat.

    lol. too much..

     

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Coweringbeef:

    Is there a need for three threads on Peter v Chambers?
     
    Anyway Sam is too fat.

    lol. too much..

     

     
    MarlonB
    MarlonB
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2009
    Posts: 483
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2009 - 6:30 PM ET #22

    Read on:
     
    This is by Graham Houston, did I mention GRAHAM HOUSTON wrote this, hey if anyone wants to know GRAHAM HOUSTON is the aurthor of this article.  So we're clear GRAHAM HOUSTON wrote this!!  Wait until I tell HIM about this one! 
     

    Peter came in at a career-heaviest 265 pounds at Thursday's weigh-in but he was wearing jeans and a dress shirt, promoter Dan Goossen said over the phone from Los Angeles on Thursday afternoon. Chambers weighed in at 223; he was wearing "sweat pants and a T-shirt". Chambers has been training at the gym run by Goossen's brother, Joe, in Los Angeles. I take this as a positive move by the Chambers camp as the fighter has removed himself from possible distractions at home in Philadelphia. "If Eddie brings to the fight what he's shown in the gym, he wins this fight," Dan Goossen said.

     

    Reply
    Read on:
     
    This is by Graham Houston, did I mention GRAHAM HOUSTON wrote this, hey if anyone wants to know GRAHAM HOUSTON is the aurthor of this article.  So we're clear GRAHAM HOUSTON wrote this!!  Wait until I tell HIM about this one! 
     

    Peter came in at a career-heaviest 265 pounds at Thursday's weigh-in but he was wearing jeans and a dress shirt, promoter Dan Goossen said over the phone from Los Angeles on Thursday afternoon. Chambers weighed in at 223; he was wearing "sweat pants and a T-shirt". Chambers has been training at the gym run by Goossen's brother, Joe, in Los Angeles. I take this as a positive move by the Chambers camp as the fighter has removed himself from possible distractions at home in Philadelphia. "If Eddie brings to the fight what he's shown in the gym, he wins this fight," Dan Goossen said.

     

     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2009 - 7:16 PM ET #23

    Quote Originally Posted by capmaster2000:



    which is it...this "isn't a bettable fight" and "stay away", or is it "eddie's coming out party" and the "end of sam peter's career"


    Obviously you don't  read NOT A  bettable fight  being where  you DON'T put a large chunk of money on the fight.

    When I wrote $1 on Chambers, it's my thought that it's not a fight  you lay big money, so of course my pick is Chambers, but at $1 because that's what this heavy weight division is worth.

    If you read my post BOTH posts, it clearly states Eddie is not world beater, and even by him beating Peter (whichever Peter shows up), would be his coming out party.

    Eddie Chambers beating Sam Peter on ESPN will be BIG FOR HIM, his coming out party being he can maybe get a shot at a title or a bigger pay day.

    Remember Sam Peter already used his life line twice on ESPN, his career is OVER. BOTH KLITCHO's are rated #1 & 2 (sadly), and he lost to BOTH.

    So whenever I say $1 it means I don't think greatly of either fighter.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by capmaster2000:



    which is it...this "isn't a bettable fight" and "stay away", or is it "eddie's coming out party" and the "end of sam peter's career"


    Obviously you don't  read NOT A  bettable fight  being where  you DON'T put a large chunk of money on the fight.

    When I wrote $1 on Chambers, it's my thought that it's not a fight  you lay big money, so of course my pick is Chambers, but at $1 because that's what this heavy weight division is worth.

    If you read my post BOTH posts, it clearly states Eddie is not world beater, and even by him beating Peter (whichever Peter shows up), would be his coming out party.

    Eddie Chambers beating Sam Peter on ESPN will be BIG FOR HIM, his coming out party being he can maybe get a shot at a title or a bigger pay day.

    Remember Sam Peter already used his life line twice on ESPN, his career is OVER. BOTH KLITCHO's are rated #1 & 2 (sadly), and he lost to BOTH.

    So whenever I say $1 it means I don't think greatly of either fighter.
     
    cpk007
    cpk007
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2009
    Posts: 61
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2009 - 7:34 PM ET #24

    Some of you in here just need to get the f**K over yourselves.  I come in here to learn a little about boxing and instead I get some circle jerk of the uptight society.   Not once in Marlon B's post did I ever see him take credit for the article.   I went back and read the comments and went back to the post and to me it seems logical that when someone says "hey this is a good read...check it out"     that's a lot different than "hey I wrote this cool article and you should all read it."

    So why doesnt the politically correct society go back under the f'n rock you came from and stop wasting time and space in forums so that people who want to learn something can do so without wading through your holier than thou bullsh**t.

    Marlon thanks for the post..and i hope you keep pointing out good articles as I'm trying to learn about this sport
    Reply
    Some of you in here just need to get the f**K over yourselves.  I come in here to learn a little about boxing and instead I get some circle jerk of the uptight society.   Not once in Marlon B's post did I ever see him take credit for the article.   I went back and read the comments and went back to the post and to me it seems logical that when someone says "hey this is a good read...check it out"     that's a lot different than "hey I wrote this cool article and you should all read it."

    So why doesnt the politically correct society go back under the f'n rock you came from and stop wasting time and space in forums so that people who want to learn something can do so without wading through your holier than thou bullsh**t.

    Marlon thanks for the post..and i hope you keep pointing out good articles as I'm trying to learn about this sport
     
     
    DannoDanger
    DannoDanger
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2008
    Posts: 3554
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2009 - 8:22 PM ET #25

    Wow.  Half an hour ago my local had Chambers at -150, now it's at -175.  This is up from -120 earlier in the week. 
    Reply
    Wow.  Half an hour ago my local had Chambers at -150, now it's at -175.  This is up from -120 earlier in the week. 
    All Forums | Boxing
    12 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Claiming Prizes 57,789
    • Tuesday 10/20/2026 861
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,229
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 61,592
    • PART DEUX 151
    • Congrats to ltdsks - 20 wins in a row! 5,075
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,283
    • Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity 33,163
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 26,088
    • NCAA WEEK 8. (( 151 )) 2,478

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.