Bradley schools Pacquiao on June 9th
God I hope this is a joke
Bradley wont be able to handle Manny's speed
God I hope this is a joke
Bradley wont be able to handle Manny's speed
Bradley the best fighter Pacquiao has faced in his career, I can prmose you this. YOu fooled the fans too long Pac, it all ends soon. Load up on Bradley, there is no way Pac will win this fight. Pac is a beaten fighrr mentally and physcially vs JMM, I saw it in his eyes, he was a defeated man. Now he's facing a guy who's going to be a star in boxing, a hungry young lion who is better skilled than Pac. Fight will be ugly if Pac cannot handle bradley on the inside and he will be stopped.
Bradley the best fighter Pacquiao has faced in his career, I can prmose you this. YOu fooled the fans too long Pac, it all ends soon. Load up on Bradley, there is no way Pac will win this fight. Pac is a beaten fighrr mentally and physcially vs JMM, I saw it in his eyes, he was a defeated man. Now he's facing a guy who's going to be a star in boxing, a hungry young lion who is better skilled than Pac. Fight will be ugly if Pac cannot handle bradley on the inside and he will be stopped.
U are a pathetic little troll, little weasel of a man who ruins this great forum...It fact its no longer great and u are a huge reason why..
U are a pathetic little troll, little weasel of a man who ruins this great forum...It fact its no longer great and u are a huge reason why..
jersey does your previous 10 wrog predictions count for anything with you. We know what happens. Pacman wins (I liked Bradley till you got involved) and you disappear. You come back with a new thread. More bullsh!t. It loses again. Law of probability means u will get one fight right and then crow ffrom the rooftops, despite the fact u lost 15 in a row before that...I could put all your bad picks on this thread but I couldnt be bothered. Everyone knows you are a total retarded barrell of monkey spunk..
U are a pathetic little troll, little weasel of a man who ruins this great forum...It fact its no longer great and u are a huge reason why..
jersey does your previous 10 wrog predictions count for anything with you. We know what happens. Pacman wins (I liked Bradley till you got involved) and you disappear. You come back with a new thread. More bullsh!t. It loses again. Law of probability means u will get one fight right and then crow ffrom the rooftops, despite the fact u lost 15 in a row before that...I could put all your bad picks on this thread but I couldnt be bothered. Everyone knows you are a total retarded barrell of monkey spunk..
U are a pathetic little troll, little weasel of a man who ruins this great forum...It fact its no longer great and u are a huge reason why..
JerseyBoy89, You want to post your thoughts, go right ahead and do it. I offer you my favorite quote of which I have embraced and carried through the peaks and valleys of life. FUCKEM ALL BIG & SMALL ![]()
JerseyBoy89, You want to post your thoughts, go right ahead and do it. I offer you my favorite quote of which I have embraced and carried through the peaks and valleys of life. FUCKEM ALL BIG & SMALL ![]()
I agree Pacquiao should stay off the ropes. Bradley doesn't have the intelligence of Morales, Barrera, Marquez or Cotto, but the blueprint has already been laid out by these guys, and one of the keys is to unload a combination when Pacquiao squares himself up on the ropes. Bradley has too much loop in his punches for my liking, but one of his strenghts is how he picks his spots to unload a combination - even if the punches are sloppy. I'm sure Bradley's camp has picked up on this and also how important it is to nuetralize Pac's biggest weapon - his straight left. This is done by the right hander circling to his left and also countering Pac when he overextends himself, which he often does.
I don't completely count out Bradley and I feel the odds are a very wrong reflection of the probabilities, yet I still favor Pacquiao. Bradley isn't raw, but he has fundamental flaws. He's fast, but not as fast as Pacquiao. He's experienced but not as much as Pacquiao, etc.
However Bradley is peaking and he just fought 2 smart southpaws. Plus the blueprint has been laid out on how to beat Pacquiao. Most importanly Bradley has the balls, combined with the minimum requirements of athleticism and ring smarts to pull off the upset. Don't underestimate Bradley's trainer when comparing fighters. He hasn't straightened out Bradley's punches, but he always gives great advice in between rounds and Bradley respects him.
Jerseyboy I know you get alot of hate on this board but I don't think it's a bad idea to lay a little on Bradley.
I agree Pacquiao should stay off the ropes. Bradley doesn't have the intelligence of Morales, Barrera, Marquez or Cotto, but the blueprint has already been laid out by these guys, and one of the keys is to unload a combination when Pacquiao squares himself up on the ropes. Bradley has too much loop in his punches for my liking, but one of his strenghts is how he picks his spots to unload a combination - even if the punches are sloppy. I'm sure Bradley's camp has picked up on this and also how important it is to nuetralize Pac's biggest weapon - his straight left. This is done by the right hander circling to his left and also countering Pac when he overextends himself, which he often does.
I don't completely count out Bradley and I feel the odds are a very wrong reflection of the probabilities, yet I still favor Pacquiao. Bradley isn't raw, but he has fundamental flaws. He's fast, but not as fast as Pacquiao. He's experienced but not as much as Pacquiao, etc.
However Bradley is peaking and he just fought 2 smart southpaws. Plus the blueprint has been laid out on how to beat Pacquiao. Most importanly Bradley has the balls, combined with the minimum requirements of athleticism and ring smarts to pull off the upset. Don't underestimate Bradley's trainer when comparing fighters. He hasn't straightened out Bradley's punches, but he always gives great advice in between rounds and Bradley respects him.
Jerseyboy I know you get alot of hate on this board but I don't think it's a bad idea to lay a little on Bradley.
no freaking way Bradley will do that, 'cause he'll eat too much leather and he will get KO'ed if he opens up too much.
he'll turn into Joshua Clottey and start covering up by round 7
no freaking way Bradley will do that, 'cause he'll eat too much leather and he will get KO'ed if he opens up too much.
he'll turn into Joshua Clottey and start covering up by round 7
Everyone needs to realize that the whirlwind Pacquiao that one punched Hatton blew out other fighters doesn't exist anymore. The regression has been subtle, yet very clear.
Everyone needs to realize that the whirlwind Pacquiao that one punched Hatton blew out other fighters doesn't exist anymore. The regression has been subtle, yet very clear.
Hot Forum Topics
- Claiming Prizes 57,784
- Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,494
- Commanders vs Niners in-game live MNF 2,751
- Monday 10/19/2026 608
- Congrats to ltdsks - 20 wins in a row! 5,051
- NFL THREAD * 151 * 26,041
- PART DEUX 158
- the whole problem is knowingly spreading false info to vulnerable people 22,987
- Monday Night Covers Bloodbath Brewing 2,456
- 49er under 52 all in do 1,515
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
