All Forums | Pro Basketball

Chicago at Indiana (04/21/2011)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3131
Posts: 20
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 61
Posted: #1

Away:  Chicago [49-33-2 ATS]
Home:  Indiana [40-42-2 ATS]

Game Time: 7:00 PM
Stadium: Conseco Fieldhouse

Recent Meetings:
04/18/11 - IND 90 vs. CHI 96
04/16/11 - IND 99 vs. CHI 104
03/18/11 - CHI 108 vs. IND 115

Team Leaders:

Chicago:
Points: Derrick Rose (25.3)
Assists: Derrick Rose (7.7)
Rebounds: Joakim Noah (10.4)

Indiana:
Points: Danny Granger (20.6)
Assists: Darren Collison (5.1)
Rebounds: Roy Hibbert (7.5)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 23290
Posted: #2
Chicago -4.5
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 23290
Posted: #3
Under 189
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 6405
Posted: #4
VER 189
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 4063
Posted: #5
Bulls at home over the past two games have out rebounded the Pacers
106 to 67..Yet they won both games by 5 and 6 points respectively.This says something about the Pacers..Their road D against the Bulls has been surprising to say the least..Back at home they`re gonna see more boards and I fancy them stealing one here on the Bulls who should go on to close it out after this game...
PACERS-ml-[+175]

BOLA

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 5818
Posted: #6
Pacers plus the chalk at home in this one! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 1708
Posted: #7
Pacers and the Over for me !!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 51
Posted: #8
YEA ZZER PACERZ AND OVER ALLDAY MING.PACER WIN TODAY TOO GET HOT THAN LOSE.ALL ABOUT M$$$$$NEY!!!!!!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 8713
Posted: #9
chi
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 439
Posted: #10
on previous game, Bulls shot 38.6% FG although Boozer did excellent job which helped secure the win.  Noah and Rose did ok but tonight they should improve.  Bull's road FG ave. is 45% which should be enough to cover 4 points.  Do not expect Bulls to get the rebounds like they did in Game 2 but they should get better FG.
Bull -4
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 2337
Posted: #11
Another One Bites the Dust! CHICAGO BULLS -4.5
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 430
Posted: #12
Looks to easy to pick Chicago.. line drops from 4.5 to 4?

Vegas is begging the suckers to pick Chicago.

Indy wins outright.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 244
Posted: #13
Vegas doesnt have to beg this "sucker" to take the WAY BETTER team!!  Bulls played terrible the first 2 games and still covered 4. As someone stated earlier the bulls shoot a higher fg% on the road, and i dont think its possible for them to play any worse then they have already.  Bulls have outrebounded pacers by 40 so far and that trend will continue! I agree with humble, bulls will have 4 players in double digits and will have 20 more rebounds.
 
Bulls -4    5 units.    104-90  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 109
Posted: #14

Quote Originally Posted by gamboholic:

Looks to easy to pick Chicago.. line drops from 4.5 to 4?

Vegas is begging the suckers to pick Chicago.

Indy wins outright.

This is a rediculous comment . The line moved from 4.5 to 4 because heavy money was coming in on Indy. Vegas makes their money on juice it's not in their best interest to have too much money on 1 side or the other. 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 6456
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by bluephinn:

Bulls at home over the past two games have out rebounded the Pacers
106 to 67..Yet they won both games by 5 and 6 points respectively.This says something about the Pacers..Their road D against the Bulls has been surprising to say the least..Back at home they`re gonna see more boards and I fancy them stealing one here on the Bulls who should go on to close it out after this game...
PACERS-ml-[+175]

BOLA

I'm BACK!!!! Rolling w this exact same thing but I only got +165

 

Pacers will play hard and hopefully win

Hope all has been well Blue. Almost done w/ Law school and see $ right around the corner.

GL

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 1157
Posted: #16
Just went kinda hard.. $300/$480   +160
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 430
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by Big-vegas:

This is a rediculous comment . The line moved from 4.5 to 4 because heavy money was coming in on Indy. Vegas makes their money on juice it's not in their best interest to have too much money on 1 side or the other. 



i believe you are wrong. You are right that vegas makes money on juice for sure. But line moved from 4.5 to because heavy money was coming in for Chi not Indy. So to have gamboholics like ourselves take the most easiest pick. Chicago. In reality its rigged, Indy wins outright. This is pretty much their game 4 and if they dont win tonight, their hopes of winning this series at all is demolished.

Thank me later. Indy +4 but no need because they win outright! +160
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 6456
Posted: #18

Quote Originally Posted by Cgizzle41:

Just went kinda hard.. $300/$480   +160

 

FYI I just finished the Wire last night! Greatest show ever created!!!

Marlo is a bitch!!!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 109
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by gamboholic:



i believe you are wrong. You are right that vegas makes money on juice for sure. But line moved from 4.5 to because heavy money was coming in for Chi not Indy. So to have gamboholics like ourselves take the most easiest pick. Chicago. In reality its rigged, Indy wins outright. This is pretty much their game 4 and if they dont win tonight, their hopes of winning this series at all is demolished.

Thank me later. Indy +4 but no need because they win outright! +160
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 109
Posted: #20

Quote Originally Posted by gamboholic:



i believe you are wrong. You are right that vegas makes money on juice for sure. But line moved from 4.5 to because heavy money was coming in for Chi not Indy. So to have gamboholics like ourselves take the most easiest pick. Chicago. In reality its rigged, Indy wins outright. This is pretty much their game 4 and if they dont win tonight, their hopes of winning this series at all is demolished.

Thank me later. Indy +4 but no need because they win outright! +160

Think you need to re think ur conspiracy theories

All Forums | Pro Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.