over, line moved up......its gonna be balls to the wall in the fourth quarter
the total moved up because the public is betting it heavy. It did the same thing in the other direction last game, but there's a reason that the total came out lower than the game 1's total after the over hit and that's because the under is the play. I like a few things in this game and i don't know what weight i will put behind them.
CAVS 1Q
they normally dominate the first quarter by about 8 points and coming of a 1Q loss and with confidence from last games comeback, they should start stronger.
UNDER 193
referees are under friendly in this one and the line came out lower than game 1. If the over was the play, the line would have come out the same as game 1, or higher. Also, I think this series is going to be much more defense based than their recent regular season matchups
BOS +6/ML
celtics could have won game 1 if rondo hadn't gotten in foul trouble and if they had let paul pierce do more in the 4th quarter. Game 1 looked sexy for the cavs with the comeback, but it made some matchup problems clear to me. Namely, as long as rondo is running game, the cavs can't stop him from getting the celtics good looks and similarly, the celtics have to assets to slow the cavs down. Linesmakers agree with me as they have dropped and moved the line in a way to force cav money.
0
Quote Originally Posted by brandnew182:
over, line moved up......its gonna be balls to the wall in the fourth quarter
the total moved up because the public is betting it heavy. It did the same thing in the other direction last game, but there's a reason that the total came out lower than the game 1's total after the over hit and that's because the under is the play. I like a few things in this game and i don't know what weight i will put behind them.
CAVS 1Q
they normally dominate the first quarter by about 8 points and coming of a 1Q loss and with confidence from last games comeback, they should start stronger.
UNDER 193
referees are under friendly in this one and the line came out lower than game 1. If the over was the play, the line would have come out the same as game 1, or higher. Also, I think this series is going to be much more defense based than their recent regular season matchups
BOS +6/ML
celtics could have won game 1 if rondo hadn't gotten in foul trouble and if they had let paul pierce do more in the 4th quarter. Game 1 looked sexy for the cavs with the comeback, but it made some matchup problems clear to me. Namely, as long as rondo is running game, the cavs can't stop him from getting the celtics good looks and similarly, the celtics have to assets to slow the cavs down. Linesmakers agree with me as they have dropped and moved the line in a way to force cav money.
the total moved up because the public is betting it heavy. It did the same thing in the other direction last game, but there's a reason that the total came out lower than the game 1's total after the over hit and that's because the under is the play. I like a few things in this game and i don't know what weight i will put behind them.
CAVS 1Q
they normally dominate the first quarter by about 8 points and coming of a 1Q loss and with confidence from last games comeback, they should start stronger.
UNDER 193
referees are under friendly in this one and the line came out lower than game 1. If the over was the play, the line would have come out the same as game 1, or higher. Also, I think this series is going to be much more defense based than their recent regular season matchups
BOS +6/ML
celtics could have won game 1 if rondo hadn't gotten in foul trouble and if they had let paul pierce do more in the 4th quarter. Game 1 looked sexy for the cavs with the comeback, but it made some matchup problems clear to me. Namely, as long as rondo is running game, the cavs can't stop him from getting the celtics good looks and similarly, the celtics have to assets to slow the cavs down. Linesmakers agree with me as they have dropped and moved the line in a way to force cav money.
Very valid points....I agree, Celtics and the under. Making a play on C's moneyline as well.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wangichu:
the total moved up because the public is betting it heavy. It did the same thing in the other direction last game, but there's a reason that the total came out lower than the game 1's total after the over hit and that's because the under is the play. I like a few things in this game and i don't know what weight i will put behind them.
CAVS 1Q
they normally dominate the first quarter by about 8 points and coming of a 1Q loss and with confidence from last games comeback, they should start stronger.
UNDER 193
referees are under friendly in this one and the line came out lower than game 1. If the over was the play, the line would have come out the same as game 1, or higher. Also, I think this series is going to be much more defense based than their recent regular season matchups
BOS +6/ML
celtics could have won game 1 if rondo hadn't gotten in foul trouble and if they had let paul pierce do more in the 4th quarter. Game 1 looked sexy for the cavs with the comeback, but it made some matchup problems clear to me. Namely, as long as rondo is running game, the cavs can't stop him from getting the celtics good looks and similarly, the celtics have to assets to slow the cavs down. Linesmakers agree with me as they have dropped and moved the line in a way to force cav money.
Very valid points....I agree, Celtics and the under. Making a play on C's moneyline as well.
I expect a big effort from the Celtic veterans tonight. They should take this one down to the wire. Plus LeBron voted the MVP is usually the kiss of death in the game following the announcement. I'll take the 6 and the boys from Beantown.
0
Cleveland - 99 Boston - 98
Celtics +6 over 192.5
I expect a big effort from the Celtic veterans tonight. They should take this one down to the wire. Plus LeBron voted the MVP is usually the kiss of death in the game following the announcement. I'll take the 6 and the boys from Beantown.
CJ whats up my brother can you beleave my ass has been in Ohio 2 freakin years already and your old ass is still on this site you are a vet lol
Gotta go against you as usuall Cavs roll this one LB big night!!!!!!
Quote Originally Posted by Coloneljim:
Cleveland - 99 Boston - 98
Celtics +6 over 192.5
I expect a big effort from the Celtic veterans tonight. They should take this one down to the wire. Plus LeBron voted the MVP is usually the kiss of death in the game following the announcement. I'll take the 6 and the boys from Beantown.
0
CJ whats up my brother can you beleave my ass has been in Ohio 2 freakin years already and your old ass is still on this site you are a vet lol
Gotta go against you as usuall Cavs roll this one LB big night!!!!!!
Quote Originally Posted by Coloneljim:
Cleveland - 99 Boston - 98
Celtics +6 over 192.5
I expect a big effort from the Celtic veterans tonight. They should take this one down to the wire. Plus LeBron voted the MVP is usually the kiss of death in the game following the announcement. I'll take the 6 and the boys from Beantown.
the total moved up because the public is betting it heavy. It did the same thing in the other direction last game, but there's a reason that the total came out lower than the game 1's total after the over hit and that's because the under is the play. I like a few things in this game and i don't know what weight i will put behind them.
CAVS 1Q
they normally dominate the first quarter by about 8 points and coming of a 1Q loss and with confidence from last games comeback, they should start stronger.
UNDER 193
referees are under friendly in this one and the line came out lower than game 1. If the over was the play, the line would have come out the same as game 1, or higher. Also, I think this series is going to be much more defense based than their recent regular season matchups
BOS +6/ML
celtics could have won game 1 if rondo hadn't gotten in foul trouble and if they had let paul pierce do more in the 4th quarter. Game 1 looked sexy for the cavs with the comeback, but it made some matchup problems clear to me. Namely, as long as rondo is running game, the cavs can't stop him from getting the celtics good looks and similarly, the celtics have to assets to slow the cavs down. Linesmakers agree with me as they have dropped and moved the line in a way to force cav money.
good point wang but money is being betted wit boston so i gotta go wit clev-6......i think bos covers in boston not in clev
0
Quote Originally Posted by wangichu:
the total moved up because the public is betting it heavy. It did the same thing in the other direction last game, but there's a reason that the total came out lower than the game 1's total after the over hit and that's because the under is the play. I like a few things in this game and i don't know what weight i will put behind them.
CAVS 1Q
they normally dominate the first quarter by about 8 points and coming of a 1Q loss and with confidence from last games comeback, they should start stronger.
UNDER 193
referees are under friendly in this one and the line came out lower than game 1. If the over was the play, the line would have come out the same as game 1, or higher. Also, I think this series is going to be much more defense based than their recent regular season matchups
BOS +6/ML
celtics could have won game 1 if rondo hadn't gotten in foul trouble and if they had let paul pierce do more in the 4th quarter. Game 1 looked sexy for the cavs with the comeback, but it made some matchup problems clear to me. Namely, as long as rondo is running game, the cavs can't stop him from getting the celtics good looks and similarly, the celtics have to assets to slow the cavs down. Linesmakers agree with me as they have dropped and moved the line in a way to force cav money.
good point wang but money is being betted wit boston so i gotta go wit clev-6......i think bos covers in boston not in clev
DID THE "SIMPLE" MATH ON THESE TEAMS PREVIOUS 5 MATCHUPS....
BOS AVG 97.2 PTS
CLE AVG 103 PTS.....FOR A TOTAL OF 200.2 PTS
PRETTY MUCH RIGHT ON WITH THERE H/A AVERAGE...AND ITS 7.5 PTS ABOVE TONIGHTS O/U...
THINKING TO MYSELF THAT BOTH THESE TEAMS HAD A CHANCE TO FEEL EACH OTHER OUT AND GET COMFORTABLE, BOTH TEAMS ARE CONFIDENT AND BELIEVE THEY CAN WIN....I THINK THEY SETTLE IN AND SCORE AROUND THERE AVERAGES....
TAKING OVER 192.5
0
SOMEBODY CHIME IN HERE PLEASE:
DID THE "SIMPLE" MATH ON THESE TEAMS PREVIOUS 5 MATCHUPS....
BOS AVG 97.2 PTS
CLE AVG 103 PTS.....FOR A TOTAL OF 200.2 PTS
PRETTY MUCH RIGHT ON WITH THERE H/A AVERAGE...AND ITS 7.5 PTS ABOVE TONIGHTS O/U...
THINKING TO MYSELF THAT BOTH THESE TEAMS HAD A CHANCE TO FEEL EACH OTHER OUT AND GET COMFORTABLE, BOTH TEAMS ARE CONFIDENT AND BELIEVE THEY CAN WIN....I THINK THEY SETTLE IN AND SCORE AROUND THERE AVERAGES....
i fully expected the line to drop today.....vegas has a way of playing with ur mind and if u let them they got u where they want u...i dont see boston winning nomore than 1 gm in this series...just my opinion
0
i fully expected the line to drop today.....vegas has a way of playing with ur mind and if u let them they got u where they want u...i dont see boston winning nomore than 1 gm in this series...just my opinion
In Gm1 Boston had 8 pt lead at half only to lose by 8. Outscored by 16 in 2nd H. Really more like 5 since last second 3 pter by James was superfluous.
Problem for Celtics is A Jamison only scored 7 in Gm1 and Cavs still won. If he gets his usual 20 then they don't need a comeback to win. Mo Williams took all his shots and had a big 20.
Also O'Neal went 4-12, he is slower than molasses on a cold January day in Fargo. The more he and Ilgauskas play and the less JJ Hickson plays the better for Celtics.
Celtics shot poorly from 3 pt line 4-16 (25%) vs season avg of 35%.
They just looked old and tired except for Rondo. They will do better tonight.
I think Gm1 diff was at foul line. Celtics 17-21, Cavs 21-31. Even called a T on Tony Allen while he was on the bench!
Closer game tonight with D Bavetta
Taking Celtics +6
0
Celtics at Cavaliers -6 O//U 192.5 (now)
In Gm1 Boston had 8 pt lead at half only to lose by 8. Outscored by 16 in 2nd H. Really more like 5 since last second 3 pter by James was superfluous.
Problem for Celtics is A Jamison only scored 7 in Gm1 and Cavs still won. If he gets his usual 20 then they don't need a comeback to win. Mo Williams took all his shots and had a big 20.
Also O'Neal went 4-12, he is slower than molasses on a cold January day in Fargo. The more he and Ilgauskas play and the less JJ Hickson plays the better for Celtics.
Celtics shot poorly from 3 pt line 4-16 (25%) vs season avg of 35%.
They just looked old and tired except for Rondo. They will do better tonight.
I think Gm1 diff was at foul line. Celtics 17-21, Cavs 21-31. Even called a T on Tony Allen while he was on the bench!
DID THE "SIMPLE" MATH ON THESE TEAMS PREVIOUS 5 MATCHUPS....
BOS AVG 97.2 PTS
CLE AVG 103 PTS.....FOR A TOTAL OF 200.2 PTS
PRETTY MUCH RIGHT ON WITH THERE H/A AVERAGE...AND ITS 7.5 PTS ABOVE TONIGHTS O/U...
THINKING TO MYSELF THAT BOTH THESE TEAMS HAD A CHANCE TO FEEL EACH OTHER OUT AND GET COMFORTABLE, BOTH TEAMS ARE CONFIDENT AND BELIEVE THEY CAN WIN....I THINK THEY SETTLE IN AND SCORE AROUND THERE AVERAGES....
TAKING OVER 192.5
I get:
100.0
96.3
196.2
195.1
0
Quote Originally Posted by PeteyRose:
SOMEBODY CHIME IN HERE PLEASE:
DID THE "SIMPLE" MATH ON THESE TEAMS PREVIOUS 5 MATCHUPS....
BOS AVG 97.2 PTS
CLE AVG 103 PTS.....FOR A TOTAL OF 200.2 PTS
PRETTY MUCH RIGHT ON WITH THERE H/A AVERAGE...AND ITS 7.5 PTS ABOVE TONIGHTS O/U...
THINKING TO MYSELF THAT BOTH THESE TEAMS HAD A CHANCE TO FEEL EACH OTHER OUT AND GET COMFORTABLE, BOTH TEAMS ARE CONFIDENT AND BELIEVE THEY CAN WIN....I THINK THEY SETTLE IN AND SCORE AROUND THERE AVERAGES....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
over 192.5
Hot Forum Topics
