%88 of the public is on chicago..this should be a pick or maybe sac -3..for some reason everyone is all over the bulls so the line moves to try and even out the money. All Smart money is on the Kings. They have identical records but Sac has been better ATS.. Sac @ home +3 GL ALL
0
Quote Originally Posted by nbrothEon:
Sac +2,5
dont understand the line movement
%88 of the public is on chicago..this should be a pick or maybe sac -3..for some reason everyone is all over the bulls so the line moves to try and even out the money. All Smart money is on the Kings. They have identical records but Sac has been better ATS.. Sac @ home +3 GL ALL
I understand how the line movement works, what i meant was that i dont understand why everybody in on the bulls like you also say. Thx for explaining anyways
0
I understand how the line movement works, what i meant was that i dont understand why everybody in on the bulls like you also say. Thx for explaining anyways
I understand how the line movement works, what i meant was that i dont understand why everybody in on the bulls like you also say. Thx for explaining anyways
Ask yourself this question? When was the last time Sacramento had major notoriety other then the occasional upset or Artest outburst? Sacramento has been rebuliding and they have a pretty decent young squad...Other side of this: Chicago has been pretty good the last few seasons right.. its all about the names with John Q Public..They go off what theyve seen most people dont do any research. Im no expert but what im saying is it would be easy to say Chicago would beat Sacramento just because of recent history..so in this case just because they are favoring Chi-town people jump right on it..Vegas will throw curveballs sometimes and catch the unsuspecting Homer every time..GL with your picks...ROB EM
0
Quote Originally Posted by nbrothEon:
I understand how the line movement works, what i meant was that i dont understand why everybody in on the bulls like you also say. Thx for explaining anyways
Ask yourself this question? When was the last time Sacramento had major notoriety other then the occasional upset or Artest outburst? Sacramento has been rebuliding and they have a pretty decent young squad...Other side of this: Chicago has been pretty good the last few seasons right.. its all about the names with John Q Public..They go off what theyve seen most people dont do any research. Im no expert but what im saying is it would be easy to say Chicago would beat Sacramento just because of recent history..so in this case just because they are favoring Chi-town people jump right on it..Vegas will throw curveballs sometimes and catch the unsuspecting Homer every time..GL with your picks...ROB EM
Rose Evans rivalry goes back. Both players will be amped for this contest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrF0oE94yIg
I'll take D-Rose and his supporting cast in their first matchup - Too much size out of Deng and Salmons on the wings for Sac-Town. Bigs on both squads will neutralize ... Taking the Bulls
0
Rose Evans rivalry goes back. Both players will be amped for this contest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrF0oE94yIg
I'll take D-Rose and his supporting cast in their first matchup - Too much size out of Deng and Salmons on the wings for Sac-Town. Bigs on both squads will neutralize ... Taking the Bulls
I understand how the line movement works, what i meant was that i dont understand why everybody in on the bulls like you also say. Thx for explaining anyways
Everyone is pushing the Bulls because they have had a much more difficult schedule.
Sac's loses have been to OKC,ATL,SA &NO only one of those teams have a winning record (ATL 9-2).
Bulls loses have come agasinst much better teams MIA, BOS, DEN, TOR none of which have losing records and combine for a record of 27-13.
For a bench mark you look at the fact both teams have played San Antonio. Chicago beat them by 7 points and held them to 85 points total (92-85). Sacramento lost by 19 points and surrendered 113 points (94-113). Sacraments has not given up any less then 97 points to any team this year! They have won 4 straight but those wins have come against Houston, OKC, Golden State & Utah whon are a losy 18-21 combined.
Finally Sacmento has no one to guard Derick Rose and Brad Miller will be at a high level playing against his former team. Andres Nocioi will be out for Sac with a hip injury.
The spread may be over valued now at -3 but a good bet is Chicago SU on the money line. I sure wouldnt bet against them!
0
Quote Originally Posted by nbrothEon:
I understand how the line movement works, what i meant was that i dont understand why everybody in on the bulls like you also say. Thx for explaining anyways
Everyone is pushing the Bulls because they have had a much more difficult schedule.
Sac's loses have been to OKC,ATL,SA &NO only one of those teams have a winning record (ATL 9-2).
Bulls loses have come agasinst much better teams MIA, BOS, DEN, TOR none of which have losing records and combine for a record of 27-13.
For a bench mark you look at the fact both teams have played San Antonio. Chicago beat them by 7 points and held them to 85 points total (92-85). Sacramento lost by 19 points and surrendered 113 points (94-113). Sacraments has not given up any less then 97 points to any team this year! They have won 4 straight but those wins have come against Houston, OKC, Golden State & Utah whon are a losy 18-21 combined.
Finally Sacmento has no one to guard Derick Rose and Brad Miller will be at a high level playing against his former team. Andres Nocioi will be out for Sac with a hip injury.
The spread may be over valued now at -3 but a good bet is Chicago SU on the money line. I sure wouldnt bet against them!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
..A DEFENSIVE BATTLE ....SAC AND THE MIGHTY UNDER
Hot Forum Topics
