All Forums | Pro Football

Chicago at Washington (12/06/2007)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 8688
Posts: 147
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 8687
Posted: #1

Away:  Chicago [4-8 ATS]
Home:  Washington [3-7-2 ATS]

Game Time: 8:00 PM
Stadium: FedEx Field

Recent Meetings:
N/A

Team Leaders:

Chicago:
Passing: Brian Griese (1508)
Rushing: Cedric Benson (678)
Receiving: Bernard Berrian (792)

Washington:
Passing: Jason Campbell (2600)
Rushing: Clinton Portis (920)
Receiving: Chris Cooley (584)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 914
Posted: #2
Give me Chicago with the points here.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5651
Posted: #3
Have to agree i just think its going to be hard for Washington to concentrate on a game for awhile to come.  They have went through so many emotions in the last week its hard to get back to football.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 1843
Posted: #4
Alright, I'm gonna try Chicago one last time. They've been burning up my money damnnear everytime that I bet with them.
 
I would have to buy the spread up to -3.5. Inconsistent quarterback play, especially in the clutch when it's needed.
 
Rex Grossman is one of the only quarterbacks that i can think of that I can honestly say that I am shocked when a pass is completed without some shit going wrong. Like Damon Huard, Tavaris Jackson, and Alex Smith, you know Joey Harrington, I mean, c'mon, you know. 
 
The Bears should let Hester take at least 5 snaps from center every game
 
I won't write this game up. Betting with the Chicago Bears is like trying to open a champagne cork with greasy hands. 
 
A year ago, this game would have been Chicago -1. That's how far things have slipped in the Windy City.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 24755
Posted: #5
I KNOW HOW YOU FEEL C KNOKER EXCEPT IN MY CASE THE SKINS HAVE BEEN BURNING UP MY CASH.
that's why i'm going with them one more time.
washington - 21                               chicago - 17
redskins                             over 37
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 914
Posted: #6
How do you clowns feel about the over?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1373
Posted: #7
Teasers were good to me last weekend so I'll try it again
BEARS +9
OVER  31
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 11877
Posted: #8
I agree with you all.......my early lean is with the Bears +3 but they screwed me also this past sunday on a 4 team parlay i had (Raiders +3,Tampa +5,Cards -1 and Bears +1.5)
 
I'll check back later....
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 241
Posted: #9
You guys know what, actually the Giants screwed us. They should've knelt on the ball ran the clock out, then kicked winning fg as time runs out. Giving those of us with Chi+1 1/2 a win.   Damn Coughlin
 
Anyways, gotta take Chi here. Wash has lost 4 str, 6 of last 8, and that was before the Taylor tragedy.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 58
Posted: #10
Food for Thoughts...It's a toss up here with both teams came off from a terrible losss at home.  Redskins is plague with injuries...Portis and Randle is likely to see less action and ineffective...Short week and travel for Chicago with no RB or running game pass... pass... with redskin no DB ShaunTaylor(RIP)...Both are on the brink of elimination from any hope of PLayoff....What Playofff......ha ha...Are you kidding me right?..Well I see the Scores Slow start for 1st half (Low) score and score can take off after second half(Over) for the whole game.  ChicaGo is Jinx with Superbowl runner up.  Teams just don't do too good the next year....same with Phila...Seatle...Too much for band wagon fans.  The wheel can't hold too much weights of trash talking fans. Watch for the People at Bodog to set the points before game start(they don't F...around when it comes down to single game a half of point can tell you who will win. Usually they don't far too much from predic outcome of the game.  GLEveryone
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 85
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by swamppdonkey77:

You guys know what, actually the Giants screwed us. They should've knelt on the ball ran the clock out, then kicked winning fg as time runs out. Giving those of us with Chi+1 1/2 a win.   Damn Coughlin
 
Anyways, gotta take Chi here. Wash has lost 4 str, 6 of last 8, and that was before the Taylor tragedy.

What game where you watching  Giants scored  a TD with 1:33 left in the game to go up  21 -16... Bears had the ball to end the game.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 85
Posted: #12
This one should be close...looking to tease the Bears to +9 and over 31 as well.
Bears       17
Redskins  21  GLA
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 115
Posted: #13
Im liking the BEARS +3 and UNDER 37
 
2 Low scoring teams
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 746
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by cocknocker:

Alright, I'm gonna try Chicago one last time. They've been burning up my money damnnear everytime that I bet with them.
 
I would have to buy the spread up to -3.5. Inconsistent quarterback play, especially in the clutch when it's needed.
 
Rex Grossman is one of the only quarterbacks that i can think of that I can honestly say that I am shocked when a pass is completed without some shit going wrong. Like Damon Huard, Tavaris Jackson, and Alex Smith, you know Joey Harrington, I mean, c'mon, you know. 
 
The Bears should let Hester take at least 5 snaps from center every game
 
I won't write this game up. Betting with the Chicago Bears is like trying to open a champagne cork with greasy hands. 
 
A year ago, this game would have been Chicago -1. That's how far things have slipped in the Windy City.

 

I was thinking more along the lines of jerking off with sandpaper.

Go Bears????

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 189
Posted: #15
I like the Bears +3 here. I think it will be close but I'm having a hard time beleiving Wash is favored with the Taylor tragedy hurting this team mentally. Injuries hurting them big time too, with only the short week to cope after a heartbreaking loss i'll take the points with CHI +3 here.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 50
Posted: #16
ndeldevil

Prospect
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 52
Location: Michigan
THE WINNING ONES WHERE MY PICKS THE LOSE WAS READING SOME OF THE POST ON COVERS BUT LIKE A DUMME.I DID NOT FOLLOW MY INST.ALSO RAVEN$ WAS MONEY BUT THE O/U WHERE BALL  AND COME ON EVERYONE WAS  ON THIS GAME.AND I JUST STARTED IN NOV. RAVEN$ AND NEW ENGLAND AT LEAST I POSTED WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPED AND IT DID TOM B SACKS TO MANY TO COUNT. YOU DON'T NO HOW I DID THE HOLE YEAR THAT'S  WHAT COUNT$. AND THAT POST I SAID WAS TALKING TO NO DOGS BECAUSE OF WHAT HE SAID.THE YEAR IS ALMOST OVER I WILL BE BACK NEXT YEAR. AND I WILL START FROM THE BEGINING THEN WE CAN TAIK SHIT.AND SEE WHAT %%%%%%%% WE REALY HAVE PEACE OUT.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 746
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by MOVETHEBALL:

ndeldevil

Prospect
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 52
Location: Michigan
THE WINNING ONES WHERE MY PICKS THE LOSE WAS READING SOME OF THE POST ON COVERS BUT LIKE A DUMME.I DID NOT FOLLOW MY INST.ALSO RAVEN$ WAS MONEY BUT THE O/U WHERE BALL  AND COME ON EVERYONE WAS  ON THIS GAME.AND I JUST STARTED IN NOV. RAVEN$ AND NEW ENGLAND AT LEAST I POSTED WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPED AND IT DID TOM B SACKS TO MANY TO COUNT. YOU DON'T NO HOW I DID THE HOLE YEAR THAT'S  WHAT COUNT$. AND THAT POST I SAID WAS TALKING TO NO DOGS BECAUSE OF WHAT HE SAID.THE YEAR IS ALMOST OVER I WILL BE BACK NEXT YEAR. AND I WILL START FROM THE BEGINING THEN WE CAN TAIK SHIT.AND SEE WHAT %%%%%%%% WE REALY HAVE PEACE OUT.

 

That post made no sense at all. Do us all a favor and type in whole sentences and TRY not to misspell every other word. I got a headach trying to read that mess.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 50
Posted: #18
SORRY I TALK HAWAIIAN STYLE NOT HAOLE AS WE SAY IN HAWAII YOU HAOLE
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 50
Posted: #19
BEARS + 3
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 3235
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by ndeldevil:

What game where you watching  Giants scored  a TD with 1:33 left in the game to go up  21 -16... Bears had the ball to end the game.

The bears vs. giants game, how bout you???? The giants had the ball at the 1 yard line with 1st and 10 with 1:33 seconds left and the bears had only 1 time out. They should of just taken a knee and ran into the middle of the field, do that twice, call a time out with a couple of seconds left and kick the field goal so the bears don't have a chance to go down the field with 1 time out and 1:30 left and score a TD.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 3235
Posted: #21
As for this game, i'll take the bears +3
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 2232
Posted: #22
I also like the bears here. Im a bit concerned about the skins disappointment losing to the Bills this past Sunday, I think they will really try to play it big tomorrow. But since they had a short week to prepare (due to the funeral) I think the Bears will win straight up or keep the the game very close.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 2178
Posted: #23
Looking at average scores, things are fairly even here...Washington has scored 229 and given up 257 for a point differential of -28......Bears have scored 237 and given up 272 for a differential of -35...average Wash score is 19-21 and average Bears score is 20-23...Washington has dropped four straight and have snake-bit themelves the last two with costly  turnovers and bad coaching moves...they have lost two of those 4 games to two first-place teams (Dallas and TB) and to a red-hot Bills team (5-2 their last 7 with losses to NE and Jax)...I watched the NYG-Bears game (won on NYG) and was amazed at how horrible the Bears rush defense was...I knew they had been bad against the run lately, but I didn't know exactly how horrendous they have actually been....when I started crunching the game, this article was on Covers...
 
Clinton Portis has faced the Bears’ defense three times in his career and has decimated it on each occasion. The way Chicago is playing this season, the destruction looks set to continue.

Portis ran for 165 yards on 14 carries against the Bears in 2003, 171 yards on 36 carries in 2004 and 121 yards on 21 attempts in 2005. He is the eighth-ranked running back in the league with 920 rushing yards and has seven touchdowns. Portis averages 6.4 yards per carry against the Bears.

Chicago’s defense is giving up 130.8 yards per game on the ground, including an NFC-worst 4.4 yards per rush. It surrendered a career-best 154 yards to Giants backup Derrick Ward last week. Opposing teams have run for 100 yards or more against the Bears in eight straight games.

Here's the whole article...

https://www.covers.com/articles/articles.aspx?theArt=156502

I think the Skins are due, fellas...it's a short week for Chicago, they are on the road, they have suspect QB play, a former #4 pick that simply can't run the football effectively, a poor rush defense and in no way do they resemble last year's team... the best offenssive play they have is the screen passes to Peterson...he still has his "rookie" moments but Jason Campbell is improving every week (the TB game was a learning experience)....still, his TD/INT ratio is 12/11 which is preferable to the 13/17 ration of the 2 Bears QB's....as noted above, Portis has flat-out owned the Bears....I mean, if Derrick Ward cashed them for 154, what will Portis do?..and look for Santana Moss and Caldwell to stretch the Bears vertically with McCardell and Cooley getting the underneath stuff, the crossing routes and the seam passes between the stripes...'Skins will do enough on defense to get 'er done and will be smart enough to kick away from Mr. Dynamite...

The old left guard and middle linebacker says: Washington -3 and Over 37.5

Good luck, everyone...as always, go make that cheese!!

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 843
Posted: #24
like the over 37.5  i think they might get snow but thiink the over is the play !
 
 
GOODLUCK
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 105
Posted: #25
Swampdonkey, couldn't agree more, thought game was in the bag!  Also didn't expect Bush to give the game away as well, was looking at a push and win, ended up getting the rub twice!  I do like the Bears though, short week, with all they went through, and having a coach who doesn't know the rules says the Bears and the points.
 
 
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.