I made some nice cash last year on RA for HOY. -120. Blame -140 is an absolute lock. If you Sports Book allows it, lay as much as possible on Blame. There are few sure things in racing, but this is one.
Sure things in racing... how about in life! As several people posted why Rachael had won it in 2009 over Zenyatta. Zenyatta was definitely deserving of the award, but one race was one of the greatest racing performances of all time. On September 5, 2009, Rachel Alexandra ran the (bumped up from $500,000 purse of) $750,000 Grade 1 Woodward Stakes against older male horses at Saratoga Race Course. By the time Rachel ran this race, she had run a grueling total of eleven races within the past 12 months. Following a blistering 22.85 opening quarter, she managed to hold off a run from the late-closing Macho Again and winning the Woodward Stakes in a time of 1:48.29. Only five other fillies have ever attempted to run in this race, and only two others came in the money: Summer Guest finished third in 1972, and Lady's Secret finished 2nd in 1986. Rachel Alexandra was the only filly or mare ever to win the Woodward Stakes. She also was the first 3-year-old filly to win a grade I route dirt race against older males in New York since since Lady Primrose won the Manhattan in 1887. This increased Rachel Alexandra's 2009 winning streak to 9 consecutive victories.
In the future Roused, try to remember that old phrase about sure things. Good luck in your future endeavors!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Quote Originally Posted by Roused:
I made some nice cash last year on RA for HOY. -120. Blame -140 is an absolute lock. If you Sports Book allows it, lay as much as possible on Blame. There are few sure things in racing, but this is one.
Sure things in racing... how about in life! As several people posted why Rachael had won it in 2009 over Zenyatta. Zenyatta was definitely deserving of the award, but one race was one of the greatest racing performances of all time. On September 5, 2009, Rachel Alexandra ran the (bumped up from $500,000 purse of) $750,000 Grade 1 Woodward Stakes against older male horses at Saratoga Race Course. By the time Rachel ran this race, she had run a grueling total of eleven races within the past 12 months. Following a blistering 22.85 opening quarter, she managed to hold off a run from the late-closing Macho Again and winning the Woodward Stakes in a time of 1:48.29. Only five other fillies have ever attempted to run in this race, and only two others came in the money: Summer Guest finished third in 1972, and Lady's Secret finished 2nd in 1986. Rachel Alexandra was the only filly or mare ever to win the Woodward Stakes. She also was the first 3-year-old filly to win a grade I route dirt race against older males in New York since since Lady Primrose won the Manhattan in 1887. This increased Rachel Alexandra's 2009 winning streak to 9 consecutive victories.
In the future Roused, try to remember that old phrase about sure things. Good luck in your future endeavors!
I acutally never got a bet in, but that doesn't make up for the fact that I was wrong. If Zenyatta were a male, Blame would have won easily. It was more about politics and publicity.
0
I acutally never got a bet in, but that doesn't make up for the fact that I was wrong. If Zenyatta were a male, Blame would have won easily. It was more about politics and publicity.
I acutally never got a bet in, but that doesn't make up for the fact that I was wrong. If Zenyatta were a male, Blame would have won easily. It was more about politics and publicity.
I made some nice cash last year on RA for HOY. -120. Blame -140 is an absolute lock. If you Sports Book allows it, lay as much as possible on Blame. There are few sure things in racing, but this is one.
You mean after all of your touting of an absolute lock, sure thing, back up the Brinks truck, etc.... you didnt place a bet???
0
Quote Originally Posted by Roused:
I acutally never got a bet in, but that doesn't make up for the fact that I was wrong. If Zenyatta were a male, Blame would have won easily. It was more about politics and publicity.
I made some nice cash last year on RA for HOY. -120. Blame -140 is an absolute lock. If you Sports Book allows it, lay as much as possible on Blame. There are few sure things in racing, but this is one.
You mean after all of your touting of an absolute lock, sure thing, back up the Brinks truck, etc.... you didnt place a bet???
I acutally never got a bet in, but that doesn't make up for the fact that I was wrong. If Zenyatta were a male, Blame would have won easily. It was more about politics and publicity.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Roused:
I acutally never got a bet in, but that doesn't make up for the fact that I was wrong. If Zenyatta were a male, Blame would have won easily. It was more about politics and publicity.
I acutally never got a bet in, but that doesn't make up for the fact that I was wrong. If Zenyatta were a male, Blame would have won easily. It was more about politics and publicity.
and if blame won, you bet the house and had the monery put on the back Porch because you didn’t want to draw attention from the IRS.
You know why Italy is shape like a boot right,
Because you cant put all the shit in a sneaker.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Roused:
I acutally never got a bet in, but that doesn't make up for the fact that I was wrong. If Zenyatta were a male, Blame would have won easily. It was more about politics and publicity.
and if blame won, you bet the house and had the monery put on the back Porch because you didn’t want to draw attention from the IRS.
On September 5, 2009, Rachel Alexandra ran the (bumped up from $500,000 purse of) $750,000 Grade 1 Woodward Stakes against older male horses at Saratoga Race Course. By the time Rachel ran this race, she had run a grueling total of eleven races within the past 12 months. Following a blistering 22.85 opening quarter, she managed to hold off a run from the late-closing Macho Again and winning the Woodward Stakes in a time of 1:48.29.
i had this stiff that day for 500 WP too bad he wasn't closer he was so far back i know she is quick but albarado (i believe if my mind serves me correctly) left this dud a sixteenth back and he rolled home big only to just miss.
if he gets in the race earlier i win 6 or 7 dimes instead of cashing some scraps for the place. his win knocks RA out of any hoy discussion after Z wins the classic. maybe Z doesn't even run in 2010.
0
On September 5, 2009, Rachel Alexandra ran the (bumped up from $500,000 purse of) $750,000 Grade 1 Woodward Stakes against older male horses at Saratoga Race Course. By the time Rachel ran this race, she had run a grueling total of eleven races within the past 12 months. Following a blistering 22.85 opening quarter, she managed to hold off a run from the late-closing Macho Again and winning the Woodward Stakes in a time of 1:48.29.
i had this stiff that day for 500 WP too bad he wasn't closer he was so far back i know she is quick but albarado (i believe if my mind serves me correctly) left this dud a sixteenth back and he rolled home big only to just miss.
if he gets in the race earlier i win 6 or 7 dimes instead of cashing some scraps for the place. his win knocks RA out of any hoy discussion after Z wins the classic. maybe Z doesn't even run in 2010.
I acutally never got a bet in, but that doesn't make up for the fact that I was wrong. If Zenyatta were a male, Blame would have won easily. It was more about politics and publicity.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Roused:
I acutally never got a bet in, but that doesn't make up for the fact that I was wrong. If Zenyatta were a male, Blame would have won easily. It was more about politics and publicity.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.