Watched this... guy hits a meaningless '3' at the buzzer, but there was ".1" and Iona fans/players went onto the court. Tech was called. Apparently double technical, because the guy shot 2 FT and not 1?
0
Watched this... guy hits a meaningless '3' at the buzzer, but there was ".1" and Iona fans/players went onto the court. Tech was called. Apparently double technical, because the guy shot 2 FT and not 1?
if the refs fixed it , then it just means they got paid to TRY to make sure of a dog cover or that they bet it themselves. doesnt mean it will always work, but in this case they saw an opportunity to still get the cover so called the tech. it isnt like the players and everyone are all in on a scripted game, thus the player hitting that 3 is meaningless in the fix question. just lucky that they still had a chance to cover.
0
if the refs fixed it , then it just means they got paid to TRY to make sure of a dog cover or that they bet it themselves. doesnt mean it will always work, but in this case they saw an opportunity to still get the cover so called the tech. it isnt like the players and everyone are all in on a scripted game, thus the player hitting that 3 is meaningless in the fix question. just lucky that they still had a chance to cover.
I understand but the only chance the refs had to "fix" it was if the 3 dropped..I'm sure nobody thought it was fixed when they called the T on manhattan coach
0
I understand but the only chance the refs had to "fix" it was if the 3 dropped..I'm sure nobody thought it was fixed when they called the T on manhattan coach
Watched this... guy hits a meaningless '3' at the buzzer, but there was ".1" and Iona fans/players went onto the court. Tech was called. Apparently double technical, because the guy shot 2 FT and not 1?
IT IS ALWAYS 2 IN COLLEGE.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JDubs800:
Watched this... guy hits a meaningless '3' at the buzzer, but there was ".1" and Iona fans/players went onto the court. Tech was called. Apparently double technical, because the guy shot 2 FT and not 1?
Stein totally different scenario. If a coach is out of line they get tech. Game was over .1 left iona ball theres no reason ever to all tech. Refs saw oppurtunity and took it
0
Stein totally different scenario. If a coach is out of line they get tech. Game was over .1 left iona ball theres no reason ever to all tech. Refs saw oppurtunity and took it
I agree there is opportunity but if it truly is "fixed" they would not be in that spot to begin with.Refs would not have to get lucky to have a chance to change the betting outcome they would have already decided it. It's one of the worst beats I have ever seen,if not the worst, but the whole fixed thing is too far fetched for me to believe in that spot
0
I agree there is opportunity but if it truly is "fixed" they would not be in that spot to begin with.Refs would not have to get lucky to have a chance to change the betting outcome they would have already decided it. It's one of the worst beats I have ever seen,if not the worst, but the whole fixed thing is too far fetched for me to believe in that spot
I did not bet this game and glad i did not. Yes it was rigged. So people who had Manhattan will say it was not rigged. Iona backers say its rigged. I think you people know its all business.
0
I did not bet this game and glad i did not. Yes it was rigged. So people who had Manhattan will say it was not rigged. Iona backers say its rigged. I think you people know its all business.
Watched this... guy hits a meaningless '3' at the buzzer, but there was ".1" and Iona fans/players went onto the court. Tech was called. Apparently double technical, because the guy shot 2 FT and not 1?
was not a double tech, because Iona shot 2 FTs when the Manhattan coach got a tech for being out of the coaches box by a step. Funny how everyone claiming rigged keeps forgetting about that BS tech.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JDubs800:
Watched this... guy hits a meaningless '3' at the buzzer, but there was ".1" and Iona fans/players went onto the court. Tech was called. Apparently double technical, because the guy shot 2 FT and not 1?
was not a double tech, because Iona shot 2 FTs when the Manhattan coach got a tech for being out of the coaches box by a step. Funny how everyone claiming rigged keeps forgetting about that BS tech.