I just started tracking the days that the public has the most wins vs the days that Vegas has the most wins. This is my second week so far and I will keep the thread updated. Last Monday was a "public win" day in NBA.
0
I just started tracking the days that the public has the most wins vs the days that Vegas has the most wins. This is my second week so far and I will keep the thread updated. Last Monday was a "public win" day in NBA.
I've done so-so on Mondays. I do want to thank you for your picks yesterday. Like I said before, I'm right in line with your thought process about the public and I tailed you yesterday with the Celtics pick and the Providence pick. Parlayed them.
The only thing about fading the public is that Vegas has to give money back to the public to keep them interested. This is why I am following the days. Two Sundays ago, the same as this past Sunday, the public got taken to the slaughter house in the NBA. I think you do a good job of finding the proper one to play. I will give you some of the details of what I recorded last week in a few.
0
I've done so-so on Mondays. I do want to thank you for your picks yesterday. Like I said before, I'm right in line with your thought process about the public and I tailed you yesterday with the Celtics pick and the Providence pick. Parlayed them.
The only thing about fading the public is that Vegas has to give money back to the public to keep them interested. This is why I am following the days. Two Sundays ago, the same as this past Sunday, the public got taken to the slaughter house in the NBA. I think you do a good job of finding the proper one to play. I will give you some of the details of what I recorded last week in a few.
The interesting thing about is over the weekend no favored teams with a huge spread covered. (at least that I noticed)
Ole Miss was -15
Butler was -16.5
Florida was -17.5
I'm thinking with the public love on Seton Hall it may be time for one to cover. Not highly analytical I know, more gut.
"Cuse is my highest rated play on the board. ND lines will always be off just b/c of their following. They had a tough time over the wknd with Depaul. 'Cuse is dpleted but now highly motivated!
This may be a Parlay for me. I don't think teasing is worth the risk 'Cuse -3.5ish and Pitt -11.5 doesn't really tickle my fancy...
The line movement in Pitt indicates at 15 point game. I think the book is trying to split the middle. They did this to perfection a few times lately that I noticed in a Penn St game and A Michigan game both were last week I believe.
Awighrt22 what are your thoughts on this?
0
Teaser--
The interesting thing about is over the weekend no favored teams with a huge spread covered. (at least that I noticed)
Ole Miss was -15
Butler was -16.5
Florida was -17.5
I'm thinking with the public love on Seton Hall it may be time for one to cover. Not highly analytical I know, more gut.
"Cuse is my highest rated play on the board. ND lines will always be off just b/c of their following. They had a tough time over the wknd with Depaul. 'Cuse is dpleted but now highly motivated!
This may be a Parlay for me. I don't think teasing is worth the risk 'Cuse -3.5ish and Pitt -11.5 doesn't really tickle my fancy...
The line movement in Pitt indicates at 15 point game. I think the book is trying to split the middle. They did this to perfection a few times lately that I noticed in a Penn St game and A Michigan game both were last week I believe.
San Diego played Gonzaga very tough on Saturday night. The book knows something here as they are trying to get the public to support at 70-75%. It will be interesting to see how the public responds. LMU got blown out by Gonzaga 88-43.
This is very strange line movement, agreed??
0
San Diego played Gonzaga very tough on Saturday night. The book knows something here as they are trying to get the public to support at 70-75%. It will be interesting to see how the public responds. LMU got blown out by Gonzaga 88-43.
The interesting thing about is over the weekend no favored teams with a huge spread covered. (at least that I noticed)
Ole Miss was -15
Butler was -16.5
Florida was -17.5
I'm thinking with the public love on Seton Hall it may be time for one to cover. Not highly analytical I know, more gut.
"Cuse is my highest rated play on the board. ND lines will always be off just b/c of their following. They had a tough time over the wknd with Depaul. 'Cuse is dpleted but now highly motivated!
This may be a Parlay for me. I don't think teasing is worth the risk 'Cuse -3.5ish and Pitt -11.5 doesn't really tickle my fancy...
The line movement in Pitt indicates at 15 point game. I think the book is trying to split the middle. They did this to perfection a few times lately that I noticed in a Penn St game and A Michigan game both were last week I believe.
Awighrt22 what are your thoughts on this?
agreed its starting to become a gut feeling .. sometimes you have to follow your gut lol
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slim-Daddy:
Teaser--
The interesting thing about is over the weekend no favored teams with a huge spread covered. (at least that I noticed)
Ole Miss was -15
Butler was -16.5
Florida was -17.5
I'm thinking with the public love on Seton Hall it may be time for one to cover. Not highly analytical I know, more gut.
"Cuse is my highest rated play on the board. ND lines will always be off just b/c of their following. They had a tough time over the wknd with Depaul. 'Cuse is dpleted but now highly motivated!
This may be a Parlay for me. I don't think teasing is worth the risk 'Cuse -3.5ish and Pitt -11.5 doesn't really tickle my fancy...
The line movement in Pitt indicates at 15 point game. I think the book is trying to split the middle. They did this to perfection a few times lately that I noticed in a Penn St game and A Michigan game both were last week I believe.
Awighrt22 what are your thoughts on this?
agreed its starting to become a gut feeling .. sometimes you have to follow your gut lol
Normally, when I see funny line movement I ask myself why. Then I research the game to find any reason why the "public fav" can lose. Does the underdog have any fighting chance to win?
The Cuse game is a tricky one for me. Cuse is undermanned and they have lost 2 in a row and are trying to avoid their 3rd consecutive loss. Although, they haven't lost at home in quite some time, ND is 3-1 on the road this season in Big East play.
0
Normally, when I see funny line movement I ask myself why. Then I research the game to find any reason why the "public fav" can lose. Does the underdog have any fighting chance to win?
The Cuse game is a tricky one for me. Cuse is undermanned and they have lost 2 in a row and are trying to avoid their 3rd consecutive loss. Although, they haven't lost at home in quite some time, ND is 3-1 on the road this season in Big East play.
Leaning Over 176.5 in Indiana vs Chicago (NBA) I predict the o/u line will drop to influence even more under wagering.
Boozer and Noah are out. Indiana is a horrific ofensive team and I look for Chicago to be a little faster paced w/out Boozer and Noah in the line-up.
i think boozer is going to play today. read that he is a game time decision but it looks like he will play. over still sounds good tho, indiana has been playing at a higher tempo the last few games.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slim-Daddy:
Leaning Over 176.5 in Indiana vs Chicago (NBA) I predict the o/u line will drop to influence even more under wagering.
Boozer and Noah are out. Indiana is a horrific ofensive team and I look for Chicago to be a little faster paced w/out Boozer and Noah in the line-up.
i think boozer is going to play today. read that he is a game time decision but it looks like he will play. over still sounds good tho, indiana has been playing at a higher tempo the last few games.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.