I kind of like Norfolk to cover against Florida, but I think everyone who watched them play very well against Missouri probably likes them to keep it close here and it may be a bit of a trap game. Just thought this stat was interesting, good luck everyone
VCU +11.5 over kansas- lost 70-62 as 3.5 dog vs butler Northern Iowa +11 over kansas- lost 59-52 as 1.5 pt dog vs msu Ohio +13.5 over Georgetown - lost 83-68 as 9 pt dog vs tennessee dayton +10 over West Virginia - lost 60-43 as 8 pt dog vs kansas sd +12 over Uconn - lost 72-63 as 5 pt dog vs western kentucky
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I kind of like Norfolk to cover against Florida, but I think everyone who watched them play very well against Missouri probably likes them to keep it close here and it may be a bit of a trap game. Just thought this stat was interesting, good luck everyone
VCU +11.5 over kansas- lost 70-62 as 3.5 dog vs butler Northern Iowa +11 over kansas- lost 59-52 as 1.5 pt dog vs msu Ohio +13.5 over Georgetown - lost 83-68 as 9 pt dog vs tennessee dayton +10 over West Virginia - lost 60-43 as 8 pt dog vs kansas sd +12 over Uconn - lost 72-63 as 5 pt dog vs western kentucky
Good stuff, wish everyone that posted had astute information like that! I aksed everyone who liked New Mexico yesterday, who NM played that was tough? OR, how was Alford going to outcoach P?
All I saw was "New Mexico"
Takes a real Einstein to come up with that.
Funny, got no answers.
0
Good stuff, wish everyone that posted had astute information like that! I aksed everyone who liked New Mexico yesterday, who NM played that was tough? OR, how was Alford going to outcoach P?
so vcu was a favorite every game last year before kansas game? i would guess they were at least a dog vs georgetown. plus WK was a 12 when then beat SD so they covered their next game
0
so vcu was a favorite every game last year before kansas game? i would guess they were at least a dog vs georgetown. plus WK was a 12 when then beat SD so they covered their next game
so vcu was a favorite every game last year before kansas game? i would guess they were at least a dog vs georgetown. plus WK was a 12 when then beat SD so they covered their next game
They were not a DOUBLE DIGIT dog until the kansas game. In fairness I just did this research by looking through the last 5 years worth of information on covers and I am a little hungover so its entirely possible I missed one, but there have been many dogs that won outright, the 0-5 stat I found was referring only to dogs of 10 or more.
0
Quote Originally Posted by weimar74:
so vcu was a favorite every game last year before kansas game? i would guess they were at least a dog vs georgetown. plus WK was a 12 when then beat SD so they covered their next game
They were not a DOUBLE DIGIT dog until the kansas game. In fairness I just did this research by looking through the last 5 years worth of information on covers and I am a little hungover so its entirely possible I missed one, but there have been many dogs that won outright, the 0-5 stat I found was referring only to dogs of 10 or more.
Another VALID point by ATL that length while not only important to the ladies is HUGE this time of year. Taller teams getting points is GOLDEN. Be nice to see some stats on this but most likely hard to come by
0
Another VALID point by ATL that length while not only important to the ladies is HUGE this time of year. Taller teams getting points is GOLDEN. Be nice to see some stats on this but most likely hard to come by
Sorry, I screwed up. I mean Xavier should be a play.
Ya, both Lehigh and Norfolk were double digit dogs so xavier and florida
would fit into this trend. But being only a 5 game sample size, I'm not
sure how strong of a trend it really is so I wouldn't make any plays
based of this alone.
0
Quote Originally Posted by vegaslover:
Sorry, I screwed up. I mean Xavier should be a play.
Ya, both Lehigh and Norfolk were double digit dogs so xavier and florida
would fit into this trend. But being only a 5 game sample size, I'm not
sure how strong of a trend it really is so I wouldn't make any plays
based of this alone.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.