Anyone else notice that line movement has been a very good indication of the ATS winner, at least as it relates to the side?
These are the games I played in the past:
(1) UCON -31 fg and UCON -16.5 1H, both had line movements in favor of UCON and both won.
(2) UCON -28 fg and UCON -15.5 1H, same as the first and both won.
(3) OU +4.5 fg and OU +2.5 1H all line movements in their favor and won.
(4) Gonzaga -2.5 fg the line opened at Zags -3.5 and ended at -2.5 and Xaiver clocked the Zags.
(5) Baylor +3 fg the line opened here and moved to +2 and Baylor won outright.
(6) South Dakota State +19 fg the line opended here and moved to +17.5 before tip and SDSU lost by 9.
(7) San Diego State +17.5 (I think) the line again moved down a point to point and a half and they also covered with ease.
(8) Nebraska -8.5 fg it moved own a full point to -7.5 I believe by tip and they lost out right (badly I might add) to Kentucky.
(9) Stanford -17.5 fg it moved down to -16.5 by tip and Xaiver almost won the game outright.
There are other games too but this is just off of my memory. My point is that whoever is moving these lines knows their $hit and perhaps we should just stop guessing and bet the line movement. What are your thoughts?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Anyone else notice that line movement has been a very good indication of the ATS winner, at least as it relates to the side?
These are the games I played in the past:
(1) UCON -31 fg and UCON -16.5 1H, both had line movements in favor of UCON and both won.
(2) UCON -28 fg and UCON -15.5 1H, same as the first and both won.
(3) OU +4.5 fg and OU +2.5 1H all line movements in their favor and won.
(4) Gonzaga -2.5 fg the line opened at Zags -3.5 and ended at -2.5 and Xaiver clocked the Zags.
(5) Baylor +3 fg the line opened here and moved to +2 and Baylor won outright.
(6) South Dakota State +19 fg the line opended here and moved to +17.5 before tip and SDSU lost by 9.
(7) San Diego State +17.5 (I think) the line again moved down a point to point and a half and they also covered with ease.
(8) Nebraska -8.5 fg it moved own a full point to -7.5 I believe by tip and they lost out right (badly I might add) to Kentucky.
(9) Stanford -17.5 fg it moved down to -16.5 by tip and Xaiver almost won the game outright.
There are other games too but this is just off of my memory. My point is that whoever is moving these lines knows their $hit and perhaps we should just stop guessing and bet the line movement. What are your thoughts?
Oh I should make it clear... I was not always on the right side of these plays. The spreads to the left where the plays I made. My point is that line movement has been 100% right ATS with all the sides I have played this womens tournament. BOL!
0
Oh I should make it clear... I was not always on the right side of these plays. The spreads to the left where the plays I made. My point is that line movement has been 100% right ATS with all the sides I have played this womens tournament. BOL!
Jesron - Care to elaborate on the Baylor play. I know Briner will be a presence in the middle, but anything else here that I need to consider. It's really hard not to back UCONN after they won me so much money already.
0
Jesron - Care to elaborate on the Baylor play. I know Briner will be a presence in the middle, but anything else here that I need to consider. It's really hard not to back UCONN after they won me so much money already.
Betting beaver ball is for person. Sorry. It's just a fact. If you are that hard up for action just bet on some ponies. Seriously. Spoken like a true gay basher, $$ is $$ and the ladies have been much better bet than most all other games this time of year. Uconn has made lots of $$ for several people here, but you stick to ponies and just keep up that gay bashing.
0
Quote Originally Posted by gfinger:
Betting beaver ball is for person. Sorry. It's just a fact. If you are that hard up for action just bet on some ponies. Seriously. Spoken like a true gay basher, $$ is $$ and the ladies have been much better bet than most all other games this time of year. Uconn has made lots of $$ for several people here, but you stick to ponies and just keep up that gay bashing.
Jesron - Care to elaborate on the Baylor play. I know Briner will be a presence in the middle, but anything else here that I need to consider. It's really hard not to back UCONN after they won me so much money already.
That and Baylor has good complementary shooters to take pressure off of Griner. Plus this team never gives up either. Ultimately I am not making this a big play because I cannot get a great feel either way and when that happens I always take the points. BOL!
If OU +13 (I got it late) hits it will just be icing on the cake anyway. I played that pretty big for me (not S. Dakota State or Baylor last game big but pretty big for me all the say). I almost thought about buying out at halftime and playing Stanford ML 2H. Hopefully it will be the right decision.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mark_Anthony:
Jesron - Care to elaborate on the Baylor play. I know Briner will be a presence in the middle, but anything else here that I need to consider. It's really hard not to back UCONN after they won me so much money already.
That and Baylor has good complementary shooters to take pressure off of Griner. Plus this team never gives up either. Ultimately I am not making this a big play because I cannot get a great feel either way and when that happens I always take the points. BOL!
If OU +13 (I got it late) hits it will just be icing on the cake anyway. I played that pretty big for me (not S. Dakota State or Baylor last game big but pretty big for me all the say). I almost thought about buying out at halftime and playing Stanford ML 2H. Hopefully it will be the right decision.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.