SAT dead UNDERS write up included

Question

Ok so my speciality is under&#x27;s, or at least I tend to win more under&#x27;s than lose, so for the purposes of this write I will say that is my specialty :) ... everyone laughed at my CU-Kent under, and then another easy win with WV under so here goes for todayBUTLER KS under 134.5Fact Butler has not let a team score 70 points in 18 straight games and only 3 times have teams scored more than 70 .. GT 72 (22 from the line) 70 Clemson (9-24 from 3 very unusual for clem) 82 Min (81 FT in game Min 23 points plus 9-19 from three) So the big question is can they slow down and Kansas St team that has only been held under 70 pts 5 times this year ???  I say yes, they have shut down 6 decent off NCAA tourney teams so far ....... Syr, MS, Utep, Siena, Gt, Ohio St ... now winning may be a different story ... NOW if KS blows the out in the 1st half because But could not score, don&#x27;t hesitate to go over in the 2nd half, as But can and will run, when they are trailing .... but I see it as a close game !!!WV-Kent Under 133.5Ok this game opened at 139, and within seconds was down to 135, and soon after 134, why in the hell does Pinnacle not take us US citizens ..... we have gotten most of the dinks out of office who were trying to stop online gambling come on Pinny chance it!!Ok back to the game ...... I am here to tell you, if Cornell can shut down a Kent team that only shoots 27% from 3 on the road all year long, WV sure as shit can! WV is big enough to stop the inside game where Cornell was not. Imagine if CU had any inside to help Foote .. KU did not look good offensively at all. Def, wow they were awesome, CU could not get a clean look at a 3, and when they did they were too tired from running in circles to shoot it. This game is a dead under. Huggins sat in the crowd during the CU game, and watched how Cornell shut KU right down and you can bet your life he has a game plan that will do the same ...can they score enough to upset KU, I don&#x27;t know, but I do know it will go under !!

NewYorkCowboy · Answer

Ok so my speciality is under&#x27;s, or at least I tend to win more under&#x27;s than lose, so for the purposes of this write I will say that is my specialty :) ... everyone laughed at my CU-Kent under, and then another easy win with WV under so here goes for todayBUTLER KS under 134.5Fact Butler has not let a team score 70 points in 18 straight games and only 3 times have teams scored more than 70 .. GT 72 (22 from the line) 70 Clemson (9-24 from 3 very unusual for clem) 82 Min (81 FT in game Min 23 points plus 9-19 from three) So the big question is can they slow down and Kansas St team that has only been held under 70 pts 5 times this year ???  I say yes, they have shut down 6 decent off NCAA tourney teams so far ....... Syr, MS, Utep, Siena, Gt, Ohio St ... now winning may be a different story ... NOW if KS blows the out in the 1st half because But could not score, don&#x27;t hesitate to go over in the 2nd half, as But can and will run, when they are trailing .... but I see it as a close game !!!WV-Kent Under 133.5Ok this game opened at 139, and within seconds was down to 135, and soon after 134, why in the hell does Pinnacle not take us US citizens ..... we have gotten most of the dinks out of office who were trying to stop online gambling come on Pinny chance it!!Ok back to the game ...... I am here to tell you, if Cornell can shut down a Kent team that only shoots 27% from 3 on the road all year long, WV sure as shit can! WV is big enough to stop the inside game where Cornell was not. Imagine if CU had any inside to help Foote .. KU did not look good offensively at all. Def, wow they were awesome, CU could not get a clean look at a 3, and when they did they were too tired from running in circles to shoot it. This game is a dead under. Huggins sat in the crowd during the CU game, and watched how Cornell shut KU right down and you can bet your life he has a game plan that will do the same ...can they score enough to upset KU, I don&#x27;t know, but I do know it will go under !!

222bad · Answer

The fact that these total lines have drop so sharply and quickly, tells me that everyone &#x27;s one the unders.  Makes you wonder.  BOL

STEELDRC · Answer

I like the Kentucky/WVU under more

rounders69 · Answer

The fact that the public is on the under so much means that both games will probably go over especially Kentucky game.  Remember the public rarely wins.   No play on Kansas St. total for me, but love Kentucky over should be a fast paced game Kentucky 77-71.

NewYorkCowboy · Answer

GL ..... but if kent does put 77 (and I am not saying they wont) I see no way in hell WV gets 58 points here to put the game over ..they simply do no have the offense to score, even in a fast paced game (which WV won;t ket happen) ... CU had a much better O ...and we all saw what KU did to them ....

nc1capper · Answer

recent trends indicate the elite 8 has seen lots of OVER plays cash in,,tight games, lots of free throws, at some point the falling total sucks all the value out for UNDER players,,,be careful fellas

222bad · Answer

Seems like a very big underestimation on your part.  No more than 58, for WVU?  If thats the case it will be because the games played with few possessions for both, so Kentucky would have to shot in the 66% range for their 77 pts, something their not good at and haven&#x27;t done all year.  BOL

tmpeus78 · Answer

word of the day is UNDER

222bad · Answer

Seems like a very big underestimation on your part.  No more than 58, for WVU?  If thats the case it will be because the games played with few possessions for both, so Kentucky would have to shot in the 66% range for their 77 pts, something their not good at and haven&#x27;t done all year.  BOL

Mush13 · Answer

NYCowboy I too have been ridin the unders @ pretty successful clip for the tourny myself, but... Just as last nights Duke game the o/u fell 3 pts and if you watched the end of the game and how a measly 43 or 45 pts in the 1st was nearly doubled in the 2nd. I had the over last night and will have the over again in Ku/WVU too much $$$ atstake and too big of a drop in the total for such a short time from when the line was posted to game time. Just my .02

NewYorkCowboy · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by Mush13]  NYCowboy I too have been ridin the unders @ pretty successful clip for the tourny myself, but... Just as last nights Duke game the o/u fell 3 pts and if you watched the end of the game and how a measly 43 or 45 pts in the 1st was nearly doubled in the 2nd.  I had the over last night and will have the over again in Ku/WVU too much $$$ atstake and too big of a drop in the total for such a short time from when the line was posted to game time.  Just my .02&#xD;&#xA;   [/Quote]I do understand, and as always I will be ready at 1/2 time to get off my bets, if necessary, but do not let the big drops fool you, or concern you; As the sharps (and I know a couple of them) literally sit and hit update, time and time again, and wait for a line to come out that is what they are looking for and then they pound it down (or up depending). The General public never gets a shot at that true opening line most of the time, much less sees it, or even knows where it started !!That duke 2nd half was crazy, both teams were making some great shots (for the first half of it anyways) and as you know as an under bettor, sometimes shit happens and we have to suck it up !!! Today with these defenses, I just don&#x27;t see anyone getting hot for too longGL

NewYorkCowboy · Answer

I am not as much concerned with trends as I am match-ups ..but thanks for your input GL

2211nfl · Answer

agree ----also look at my recent post concerning 1st 1/2 and 2nd 1/2 unders last two days---teams tenative 1st 1/2 for sure.&#xD;&#xA;good luck today

DaKid · Answer

CRIS Opened WV/Kentucky at 136.

SAT dead UNDERS write up included

Hot Forum Topics