Seemed to good to be true, but the nerds confirm probability outcome at 62.18% to hit so I'm going in huge.
Sienna is big up front which matches a Big 10 team well. Offensive rebounding is a strength and it's not s strength of Purdue.
Purdue is one of those teams that not only doesn't shoot 3's well at all (#264) and doesn't defend it well either (#263). What does that mean............Sienna will have a strong transition game with alot of opportunity on both ends from the perimeter, rebounding, and second chance points in transition if the 3's miss.
The obvious angle is Purdue losing their star player in Hummell really makes this an attractive play.
Sienna +4.5
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Seemed to good to be true, but the nerds confirm probability outcome at 62.18% to hit so I'm going in huge.
Sienna is big up front which matches a Big 10 team well. Offensive rebounding is a strength and it's not s strength of Purdue.
Purdue is one of those teams that not only doesn't shoot 3's well at all (#264) and doesn't defend it well either (#263). What does that mean............Sienna will have a strong transition game with alot of opportunity on both ends from the perimeter, rebounding, and second chance points in transition if the 3's miss.
The obvious angle is Purdue losing their star player in Hummell really makes this an attractive play.
Siennas rebounding strength is a result of one guy averaging 11 rebounds per game with over one third of them offensive. Ryan Rossiter. Considering the teams he had to rebound against the numbers are over inflated. Feel that Painter knows this and will really stress boxing him out. He does also have a tendency to fight to hard for them and get silly fouls. Fouled out of the Fairfield game and if not for the three fouls Sienna had to waste in the last 12.6 seconds, Fairfield could easily have won that game and the Saints could be outside looking in. Stags never got a chance to get off an open look. Seems way to easy to score off transition on Sienna and I think that's where the bulk of Purdues' points will come from. This group has been together for as long as Siennas core players and I just can't see them losing this game, Hummell or not. Don't forget about the injury to Siennas second best guard behind Moore. Just-in Love will be getting more minutes, kind of why I'm just in love with Purdue. BOL on the play.
0
Siennas rebounding strength is a result of one guy averaging 11 rebounds per game with over one third of them offensive. Ryan Rossiter. Considering the teams he had to rebound against the numbers are over inflated. Feel that Painter knows this and will really stress boxing him out. He does also have a tendency to fight to hard for them and get silly fouls. Fouled out of the Fairfield game and if not for the three fouls Sienna had to waste in the last 12.6 seconds, Fairfield could easily have won that game and the Saints could be outside looking in. Stags never got a chance to get off an open look. Seems way to easy to score off transition on Sienna and I think that's where the bulk of Purdues' points will come from. This group has been together for as long as Siennas core players and I just can't see them losing this game, Hummell or not. Don't forget about the injury to Siennas second best guard behind Moore. Just-in Love will be getting more minutes, kind of why I'm just in love with Purdue. BOL on the play.
Siena is not as big as the original post implies. Rossiter is there only true big man. Franklin plays great in the post against MAAC competition, but he is only 6'5" at best. He will score points. But he shouldn't be a major factor on glass. Jackson and Ubiles have height but niether like to venture inside.
I attended all of MAAC tourney in person. Siena looked awful except for short bursts. Fairfield dominated them until Siena applied full court press midway through 2H. Purdue should be able to handle that if they try.
Edwin Ubiles is nowhere near 100%. His left leg moves like it is stuck in concrete.
0
Best bet here is OVER 130.
Siena plays no defense.
I like Purdue -4 also, but don't love it.
Siena is not as big as the original post implies. Rossiter is there only true big man. Franklin plays great in the post against MAAC competition, but he is only 6'5" at best. He will score points. But he shouldn't be a major factor on glass. Jackson and Ubiles have height but niether like to venture inside.
I attended all of MAAC tourney in person. Siena looked awful except for short bursts. Fairfield dominated them until Siena applied full court press midway through 2H. Purdue should be able to handle that if they try.
Edwin Ubiles is nowhere near 100%. His left leg moves like it is stuck in concrete.
Seemed to good to be true, but the nerds confirm probability outcome at 62.18% to hit so I'm going in huge.
Sienna is big up front which matches a Big 10 team well. Offensive rebounding is a strength and it's not s strength of Purdue.
Purdue is one of those teams that not only doesn't shoot 3's well at all (#264) and doesn't defend it well either (#263). What does that mean............Sienna will have a strong transition game with alot of opportunity on both ends from the perimeter, rebounding, and second chance points in transition if the 3's miss.
The obvious angle is Purdue losing their star player in Hummell really makes this an attractive play.
Sienna +4.5
0
Quote Originally Posted by Gilberto:
Seemed to good to be true, but the nerds confirm probability outcome at 62.18% to hit so I'm going in huge.
Sienna is big up front which matches a Big 10 team well. Offensive rebounding is a strength and it's not s strength of Purdue.
Purdue is one of those teams that not only doesn't shoot 3's well at all (#264) and doesn't defend it well either (#263). What does that mean............Sienna will have a strong transition game with alot of opportunity on both ends from the perimeter, rebounding, and second chance points in transition if the 3's miss.
The obvious angle is Purdue losing their star player in Hummell really makes this an attractive play.
Siena is not as big as the original post implies. Rossiter is there only true big man. Franklin plays great in the post against MAAC competition, but he is only 6'5" at best. He will score points. But he shouldn't be a major factor on glass. Jackson and Ubiles have height but niether like to venture inside.
I attended all of MAAC tourney in person. Siena looked awful except for short bursts. Fairfield dominated them until Siena applied full court press midway through 2H. Purdue should be able to handle that if they try.
Edwin Ubiles is nowhere near 100%. His left leg moves like it is stuck in concrete.
i played against franklin in highschool and im a 5-10 white guy... haha
0
Quote Originally Posted by afrye:
Best bet here is OVER 130.
Siena plays no defense.
I like Purdue -4 also, but don't love it.
Siena is not as big as the original post implies. Rossiter is there only true big man. Franklin plays great in the post against MAAC competition, but he is only 6'5" at best. He will score points. But he shouldn't be a major factor on glass. Jackson and Ubiles have height but niether like to venture inside.
I attended all of MAAC tourney in person. Siena looked awful except for short bursts. Fairfield dominated them until Siena applied full court press midway through 2H. Purdue should be able to handle that if they try.
Edwin Ubiles is nowhere near 100%. His left leg moves like it is stuck in concrete.
i played against franklin in highschool and im a 5-10 white guy... haha
Seemed to good to be true, but the nerds confirm probability outcome at 62.18% to hit so I'm going in huge.
Sienna is big up front which matches a Big 10 team well. Offensive rebounding is a strength and it's not s strength of Purdue.
Purdue is one of those teams that not only doesn't shoot 3's well at all (#264) and doesn't defend it well either (#263). What does that mean............Sienna will have a strong transition game with alot of opportunity on both ends from the perimeter, rebounding, and second chance points in transition if the 3's miss.
The obvious angle is Purdue losing their star player in Hummell really makes this an attractive play.
Sienna +4.5
Looks like my system was better than yours my bro
0
Quote Originally Posted by Gilberto:
Seemed to good to be true, but the nerds confirm probability outcome at 62.18% to hit so I'm going in huge.
Sienna is big up front which matches a Big 10 team well. Offensive rebounding is a strength and it's not s strength of Purdue.
Purdue is one of those teams that not only doesn't shoot 3's well at all (#264) and doesn't defend it well either (#263). What does that mean............Sienna will have a strong transition game with alot of opportunity on both ends from the perimeter, rebounding, and second chance points in transition if the 3's miss.
The obvious angle is Purdue losing their star player in Hummell really makes this an attractive play.
Gilberto--do your thing man, phuk the bashers that never post and can't pick their nose but expect 100% from those that do... There's always the next game...GL man...
0
Gilberto--do your thing man, phuk the bashers that never post and can't pick their nose but expect 100% from those that do... There's always the next game...GL man...
Gilberto--do your thing man, phuk the bashers that never post and can't pick their nose but expect 100% from those that do... There's always the next game...GL man...
Thanks bro, your right and they really don't get to me just having fun with them. I'm in Key West vacationing on gambling winnings and have for a long time so all is good.
Posting in NBA in minutes.............and to prove I'm about making money and not siding with particular teams.........going to lay money on the Celtics who I can't stand, but it's about $$
0
Quote Originally Posted by SimonSezSo:
Gilberto--do your thing man, phuk the bashers that never post and can't pick their nose but expect 100% from those that do... There's always the next game...GL man...
Thanks bro, your right and they really don't get to me just having fun with them. I'm in Key West vacationing on gambling winnings and have for a long time so all is good.
Posting in NBA in minutes.............and to prove I'm about making money and not siding with particular teams.........going to lay money on the Celtics who I can't stand, but it's about $$
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
