Haha those teams even being young are still far better then anything ASU has beaten. The pac 10 is a fraud, they are soft and todays games showed that. This shit shows that ASU has hardly been tested and yes I dont consider a terrible pac 10 anything to hang your hat on.
Ill take CUSE's resume, experiance and coach over anything that ASU brings to the table. This game is shaping up to be exactly like the NOVA/UCLA game that you got BURNED on. Its pretty obvious you badly overrated the Pac 10 seeing you had UCLA going all the way to the final four. That was one hell of a stupid pick.
ASU has 2 players and a point guard thats going to have his lunch handed to him by Johnny Flynn. Pendergraft isnt the dominant force your making him out to be. He will have his trouble all day with Onauku and Jackson. This game is going to turn out exactly like the NOVA game where people like you thought it was some sort of "trap" and a gift but at the end of the game come out looking totally foolish and clueless.
What the hell does your former teammate playing on UConn have anything to do with this game? Do you think because you played with a good player once that your some kind of special capper. If that was the case I guess anyone thats ever been good at basketball or been able to spot talent would be millionaires and ripping up vegas.
Your losing money tomorrow bud. Syracuse is winning this game.
Haha those teams even being young are still far better then anything ASU has beaten. The pac 10 is a fraud, they are soft and todays games showed that. This shit shows that ASU has hardly been tested and yes I dont consider a terrible pac 10 anything to hang your hat on.
Ill take CUSE's resume, experiance and coach over anything that ASU brings to the table. This game is shaping up to be exactly like the NOVA/UCLA game that you got BURNED on. Its pretty obvious you badly overrated the Pac 10 seeing you had UCLA going all the way to the final four. That was one hell of a stupid pick.
It shows how badly you overrated the pac 10 and your definitely here supporting another pac 10 team thats proved really nothing this season. If they are so good why do they have 2 loss's to all of USC, W State and Washington. For being such a solid team, losing twice to 3 teams in your conference doesnt bode well for the argument especially when the conference was crap that season.
i know talent. i wouldnt trust Devendorf and flynn against Harden and Pendergraph
this will be at the very least a close game. but i can see arizona st winning by 10+ easy
i have Arizona st reaching the final 4.
You can see ASU winning by 10+ but at the same time you think its going to be a close game. There is really no chance ASU wins this game by 10+ points. I really dont care because I have no bias but the pac 10 is crap and I think all the first round wins by that conference are clouding peoples judgement. I guess you didnt learn anything from today.
Oh ya, two good players doesnt make a team. If that was the case Wake Forest wouldnt have lost in the first round.
ASU has 2 players and a point guard thats going to have his lunch handed to him by Johnny Flynn. Pendergraft isnt the dominant force your making him out to be. He will have his trouble all day with Onauku and Jackson. This game is going to turn out exactly like the NOVA game where people like you thought it was some sort of "trap" and a gift but at the end of the game come out looking totally foolish and clueless.
Arizona St. plays a very tough matchup zone. It's not like they can just iso Flynn and let him go one-on-one. This isn't the NBA, in college you can sit in a zone and let your friends help you out. So yeah Glasser isn't the fleetest of foot but they play a zone so that is mitigated.
This is a frustrating team to play against. They shoot absolutely lights out from three. They're the type of team where they'll be up ten points in a game and you'll be sitting there wondering how the hell it happened, but it did. I know they don't look like much, but this is a tough team. They aren't flashy, they don't have any McDonald's All-Americans, but they are very well-coached, smart and they play to their strengths.
It shows how badly you overrated the pac 10 and your definitely here supporting another pac 10 team thats proved really nothing this season. If they are so good why do they have 2 loss's to all of USC, W State and Washington. For being such a solid team, losing twice to 3 teams in your conference doesnt bode well for the argument especially when the conference was crap that season.
Arizona St. plays a very tough matchup zone. It's not like they can just iso Flynn and let him go one-on-one. This isn't the NBA, in college you can sit in a zone and let your friends help you out. So yeah Glasser isn't the fleetest of foot but they play a zone so that is mitigated.
This is a frustrating team to play against. They shoot absolutely lights out from three. They're the type of team where they'll be up ten points in a game and you'll be sitting there wondering how the hell it happened, but it did. I know they don't look like much, but this is a tough team. They aren't flashy, they don't have any McDonald's All-Americans, but they are very well-coached, smart and they play to their strengths.
James Harden is projected to be a top 3 pick. How can you imply they dont have any elite level talents?
Dont give me that bullshit. You posted on here that you had UCLA going to the final four, nothing about it being some kind of pool pick that you made because youd make more money on picking UCLA then one of the more favoured team. You were out of your mind to think a mediocre UCLA could run that murderers row. You overrated the pac 10 and now your overrating ASU to partially back up your earlier play on UCLA.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
