I like Benesova to lose...too much tennis and is playing a live dog opponent that is playing really well winning a recent tournament in Warsaw knocking off heads of Errani, Hantuchova and Alona Bondarenko...
0
I like Benesova to lose...too much tennis and is playing a live dog opponent that is playing really well winning a recent tournament in Warsaw knocking off heads of Errani, Hantuchova and Alona Bondarenko...
Like Fognini alot tomorrow and possibly Monaco... is there any reason to fear a let down out of Monaco following his appearance in the swedish tourney final?
Also is it a safe assumption that in mens tourneys that are best outta 3 more dogs will roll because the players do not have to play as long of matches or win as many sets and favorites don't have as much time to recover if they start off slow.
0
Like Fognini alot tomorrow and possibly Monaco... is there any reason to fear a let down out of Monaco following his appearance in the swedish tourney final?
Also is it a safe assumption that in mens tourneys that are best outta 3 more dogs will roll because the players do not have to play as long of matches or win as many sets and favorites don't have as much time to recover if they start off slow.
I like Benneteau...leaning towards a wager on him but his form is concerning...Chela's not any better though...
Just woke up there bud. Reasoning behind the Benesova match was her recent form is picking up and she was playing some great tennis. Although Dulgheru shocked everyone by winning Warsaw a couple weeks back I think she has struggled for form since and she didn't look overly impressive in a Challenger event losing out to World number 160. I watched her match against Carla Suarez Navarro in Prague and although she took her to 3 sets I wasn't overly impressed by her game. Anyways onto Benneteau, I really like him in this spot, small underdog. He leads the H2H 2-0 although none of them have been played on clay. Chela has been playing Challenger events the last few weeks and although he has progressed far I don't think he will get by Benneteau here. If Benneteau can get his form back from the Austrian Open, it's game set match.
0
Quote Originally Posted by michaelpaul1:
I like Benneteau...leaning towards a wager on him but his form is concerning...Chela's not any better though...
Just woke up there bud. Reasoning behind the Benesova match was her recent form is picking up and she was playing some great tennis. Although Dulgheru shocked everyone by winning Warsaw a couple weeks back I think she has struggled for form since and she didn't look overly impressive in a Challenger event losing out to World number 160. I watched her match against Carla Suarez Navarro in Prague and although she took her to 3 sets I wasn't overly impressed by her game. Anyways onto Benneteau, I really like him in this spot, small underdog. He leads the H2H 2-0 although none of them have been played on clay. Chela has been playing Challenger events the last few weeks and although he has progressed far I don't think he will get by Benneteau here. If Benneteau can get his form back from the Austrian Open, it's game set match.
HineysDaMan - I would be weary of picking Monaco due to the fact that he was playing a few days ago in a final and fatigue could be an issue. He should win as he is the better player but time and time again I have seen players go far in tournaments and play really good tennis only for them to crash out in the early stages the following week. Tread lightly. Good luck though!
0
Jarrett75
HineysDaMan - I would be weary of picking Monaco due to the fact that he was playing a few days ago in a final and fatigue could be an issue. He should win as he is the better player but time and time again I have seen players go far in tournaments and play really good tennis only for them to crash out in the early stages the following week. Tread lightly. Good luck though!
I'd be worried about Bammer...clay is not her best surface and her odds were inflated due to her win last week. Keep in mind the fatigue factor and the fact her opponent has some decent results on clay. She might win...but to say she can't lose is idiotic.
0
You don't see anyone losing?
I'd be worried about Bammer...clay is not her best surface and her odds were inflated due to her win last week. Keep in mind the fatigue factor and the fact her opponent has some decent results on clay. She might win...but to say she can't lose is idiotic.
Honestly, just stop it, I really hope you're not playing with real money as you will crash and burn with such incredibly stupid picks.Just reading stats in tennis and even doing it wrong ain't gonna get you nowhere.By doing so you could think that Melzer or Troicki are good clay courters when they actually suck badly on it.Also h2h is to be taken very lightly.
I honestly can't see at least one not losing.Simon is in very poor shape, the opponent is bad, but with Simons UE's and support and home feeling for the German an upset is possible. Wawrinka didn't play anything after Wimb, so could come of rusty and unprepared for clay and Garcia has a good serve and is a Spaniard, that tells you the danger.You bought into the hype for Bammer after the win, she's not that good, and again far from safe against solid Sevastova. Generally, tennis unless Rafa, Federer, Williams' at Wimb is anything but safe, because everything depends just on one person, and on a bad day a top 20 player can lose easily to anyone from the top 200, and playing parlays especially for the big money is the dumbest thing you can actually do here.
Wanted to write this yesterday when I saw the Kanepi & Seppi picks, which were horrendous, both completely out of form, terribly low odds, against solid oponents, and far from players to trust, but didn't have time.
Just ease up a bit, watch some games, don't trust the stats as they hide a lot, and always be aware that this is the hardest sport to predict, even before baseball and hockey.
And BOL with hitting that parlay as it's obviously possible, when hard and not recommended.
0
Honestly, just stop it, I really hope you're not playing with real money as you will crash and burn with such incredibly stupid picks.Just reading stats in tennis and even doing it wrong ain't gonna get you nowhere.By doing so you could think that Melzer or Troicki are good clay courters when they actually suck badly on it.Also h2h is to be taken very lightly.
I honestly can't see at least one not losing.Simon is in very poor shape, the opponent is bad, but with Simons UE's and support and home feeling for the German an upset is possible. Wawrinka didn't play anything after Wimb, so could come of rusty and unprepared for clay and Garcia has a good serve and is a Spaniard, that tells you the danger.You bought into the hype for Bammer after the win, she's not that good, and again far from safe against solid Sevastova. Generally, tennis unless Rafa, Federer, Williams' at Wimb is anything but safe, because everything depends just on one person, and on a bad day a top 20 player can lose easily to anyone from the top 200, and playing parlays especially for the big money is the dumbest thing you can actually do here.
Wanted to write this yesterday when I saw the Kanepi & Seppi picks, which were horrendous, both completely out of form, terribly low odds, against solid oponents, and far from players to trust, but didn't have time.
Just ease up a bit, watch some games, don't trust the stats as they hide a lot, and always be aware that this is the hardest sport to predict, even before baseball and hockey.
And BOL with hitting that parlay as it's obviously possible, when hard and not recommended.
K.. got that Coley? Stop wagering..don't look at stats, don't look at
h2h, only play Rafa, Fed and the Sisters. Then watch some "games" (not
matches) (of course you have all the time and access to every match),
and never play parlays.
Take advice from a guy that doesn't know the difference btw a game and a match!! Riiiiiiiiiiiight...
In other words... just quit, he says.
I cannot fucking stand clowns who think they have it figured out and talk to people like they are dumb.
Guess what fucko? You got nothing postive to say... eat a dick! And post some pick to back up your claims of "tennis guru".
0
K.. got that Coley? Stop wagering..don't look at stats, don't look at
h2h, only play Rafa, Fed and the Sisters. Then watch some "games" (not
matches) (of course you have all the time and access to every match),
and never play parlays.
Take advice from a guy that doesn't know the difference btw a game and a match!! Riiiiiiiiiiiight...
In other words... just quit, he says.
I cannot fucking stand clowns who think they have it figured out and talk to people like they are dumb.
Guess what fucko? You got nothing postive to say... eat a dick! And post some pick to back up your claims of "tennis guru".
Lol, people, why so agressive, I'm just trying to give some constructive help as the guy obviously needs it, it's not just bad luck to be 30 units down and counting.You gotta realize that it's not about hitting in streaks, it's about value and posibilities, and since I've been following for a week I haven't seen one solid pick from him, not talking about results as they dont matter really in the short term. For example he's playing big favs, and then doesn't play Soderling at home in good shape, full of confidence at some solid 1.45 odds. I'm new here, so it might come of as talking shit, but I'll start posting picks from tommorow on. So just trying to help, the bookies are our enemies, not here for whining and stuff.
0
Lol, people, why so agressive, I'm just trying to give some constructive help as the guy obviously needs it, it's not just bad luck to be 30 units down and counting.You gotta realize that it's not about hitting in streaks, it's about value and posibilities, and since I've been following for a week I haven't seen one solid pick from him, not talking about results as they dont matter really in the short term. For example he's playing big favs, and then doesn't play Soderling at home in good shape, full of confidence at some solid 1.45 odds. I'm new here, so it might come of as talking shit, but I'll start posting picks from tommorow on. So just trying to help, the bookies are our enemies, not here for whining and stuff.
Guess your not smart enought to realize she is playing Vierin and not Sevastova. Which means the Bammer match is void and his parlay is now only Simon and Wawrinka
0
Bammer on the comeback?
Guess your not smart enought to realize she is playing Vierin and not Sevastova. Which means the Bammer match is void and his parlay is now only Simon and Wawrinka
Lol, people, why so agressive, I'm just trying to give some constructive help as the guy obviously needs it, it's not just bad luck to be 30 units down and counting.You gotta realize that it's not about hitting in streaks, it's about value and posibilities, and since I've been following for a week I haven't seen one solid pick from him, not talking about results as they dont matter really in the short term. For example he's playing big favs, and then doesn't play Soderling at home in good shape, full of confidence at some solid 1.45 odds. I'm new here, so it might come of as talking shit, but I'll start posting picks from tommorow on. So just trying to help, the bookies are our enemies, not here for whining and stuff.
That's the whole point... you pulled the trigger on the guy after one week? What? U never had a bad week? Or run.
I'm just tired of guys coming into threads a ripping guys new ones and calling it constructive criticism. Place is full of testosterone filled monkeys who think they have the world figured out (see: Sparty, 444 aka The "Honesty" Police aka "Thread killer" aka "Shitdisturber" aka "Know It All" aka "Stalker")
By all means.. I am with you... killing the bookies and helping each other out. I don't really care for money management advice (as in units).. it's all about the picks.. what I wager or what you wager is of no1s concern.
==
Sparty, you waste of life... she was down 2 -5 in the 1st .. I'd call that a comback. And touche, I woke up late... as far I knew she was playing V originally.
0
Quote Originally Posted by The_Untouchable:
Lol, people, why so agressive, I'm just trying to give some constructive help as the guy obviously needs it, it's not just bad luck to be 30 units down and counting.You gotta realize that it's not about hitting in streaks, it's about value and posibilities, and since I've been following for a week I haven't seen one solid pick from him, not talking about results as they dont matter really in the short term. For example he's playing big favs, and then doesn't play Soderling at home in good shape, full of confidence at some solid 1.45 odds. I'm new here, so it might come of as talking shit, but I'll start posting picks from tommorow on. So just trying to help, the bookies are our enemies, not here for whining and stuff.
That's the whole point... you pulled the trigger on the guy after one week? What? U never had a bad week? Or run.
I'm just tired of guys coming into threads a ripping guys new ones and calling it constructive criticism. Place is full of testosterone filled monkeys who think they have the world figured out (see: Sparty, 444 aka The "Honesty" Police aka "Thread killer" aka "Shitdisturber" aka "Know It All" aka "Stalker")
By all means.. I am with you... killing the bookies and helping each other out. I don't really care for money management advice (as in units).. it's all about the picks.. what I wager or what you wager is of no1s concern.
==
Sparty, you waste of life... she was down 2 -5 in the 1st .. I'd call that a comback. And touche, I woke up late... as far I knew she was playing V originally.
you should realize.. that everyone has completely different styles. Just like chess or poker. What works for you may not work for others, therefore I don't see what anyone gains by calling someone's pick idiotic. {(again see Sparty 444 implying I am not smart... meaning no 1 on the planet is, but him. I don't think I've see a thread where he doesn't call the author a moron (or is it moreon? - that's how he spells it) or an idiot. But don't worry, if he's out of line he'll encourge you to contact Covers. What a fucking piece of work this guy is.. Sporty? What's that for? Your favourite Spice Girl? and 444 is your weight?}
Soldering may have looked good, no argument. But even I couldn't pull the trigger cuz I don't like wagering on matches that involve countrymen. (see? an angle that may seem absurd, but it's how I roll)
Anyway, I am looking forward to your contributions on here. The more brain power we can get on these matches, the better.
0
And TU,
you should realize.. that everyone has completely different styles. Just like chess or poker. What works for you may not work for others, therefore I don't see what anyone gains by calling someone's pick idiotic. {(again see Sparty 444 implying I am not smart... meaning no 1 on the planet is, but him. I don't think I've see a thread where he doesn't call the author a moron (or is it moreon? - that's how he spells it) or an idiot. But don't worry, if he's out of line he'll encourge you to contact Covers. What a fucking piece of work this guy is.. Sporty? What's that for? Your favourite Spice Girl? and 444 is your weight?}
Soldering may have looked good, no argument. But even I couldn't pull the trigger cuz I don't like wagering on matches that involve countrymen. (see? an angle that may seem absurd, but it's how I roll)
Anyway, I am looking forward to your contributions on here. The more brain power we can get on these matches, the better.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
