So I need Englnad to advance to close 2 parlays totalling $800.
When I say advance they just need to advance in any way at any point of the game. So how should I hedge this? I dont hedge much so I am wondering what the best way to play this is. I know taking Germany to advance is the most logical for say $200.
Any thoughts?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
So I need Englnad to advance to close 2 parlays totalling $800.
When I say advance they just need to advance in any way at any point of the game. So how should I hedge this? I dont hedge much so I am wondering what the best way to play this is. I know taking Germany to advance is the most logical for say $200.
I am making sure I make money. If England advances I hit the parlays which were the original wagers. I then bet on Germany to advance and draw and England on the ML. NOw I have all three options and best case scnerio is Englnad winning in reg time ot OT.
I dont understand your staement 9wings
0
??
I am making sure I make money. If England advances I hit the parlays which were the original wagers. I then bet on Germany to advance and draw and England on the ML. NOw I have all three options and best case scnerio is Englnad winning in reg time ot OT.
im saying that if you left England off your parlays, you would have already won and wouldn't have to now wager on BOTH sides of a game in order to get your cash.
0
im saying that if you left England off your parlays, you would have already won and wouldn't have to now wager on BOTH sides of a game in order to get your cash.
Ya thanks but thats not the case these parlays were made 2 days ago so that option isnt available. I had Uruguay to advance, HOnduras Swiss tie, and a tennis match Brands over Hanescu. The other was Honduras +1, Uruguay and England to advance.
0
?
Ya thanks but thats not the case these parlays were made 2 days ago so that option isnt available. I had Uruguay to advance, HOnduras Swiss tie, and a tennis match Brands over Hanescu. The other was Honduras +1, Uruguay and England to advance.
I'm just trying to educate you on the nature of parlays, as i see people doing this all the time and not understanding the mathematics behind it.. Unless the games are happening simultaneously, then there is no reason to parlay them. All a parlay is is betting on one game, then rolling your original bet + winnings on the next game and so on. If you knew a few days ago that you wouldn't want to have $800 riding on England, you should have just played the games all separately, rolling whatever amount of the original winnings you felt comfortable with.
0
I'm just trying to educate you on the nature of parlays, as i see people doing this all the time and not understanding the mathematics behind it.. Unless the games are happening simultaneously, then there is no reason to parlay them. All a parlay is is betting on one game, then rolling your original bet + winnings on the next game and so on. If you knew a few days ago that you wouldn't want to have $800 riding on England, you should have just played the games all separately, rolling whatever amount of the original winnings you felt comfortable with.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.