Like it or not, this person is NOT the face of food stamps. This is a small minority, and this is how the press offers it us we, the sheeple. MOST food stamp recipients are slugs, leeches, lazy scum who think it the government (our money) owe them this. I was in the food industry for 18 years. Witnessed the abuse first hand.
Like it or not, this person is NOT the face of food stamps. This is a small minority, and this is how the press offers it us we, the sheeple. MOST food stamp recipients are slugs, leeches, lazy scum who think it the government (our money) owe them this. I was in the food industry for 18 years. Witnessed the abuse first hand.
Like it or not, this person is NOT the face of food stamps. This is a small minority, and this is how the press offers it us we, the sheeple. MOST food stamp recipients are slugs, leeches, lazy scum who think it the government (our money) owe them this. I was in the food industry for 18 years. Witnessed the abuse first hand.
After I see the first two sentences, I was just about to agree with him in amazement.
A mere two sentences later, he digs himself a hole and buries himself in it.
Yes, MOST of these bastards are scum. The majority. Because he knows the majority. Because he was in the 'food industry' (whatever that means) in one city in America.
Now he can speak for MOST people on food stamps and how they are lazy bastards.
But not this ONE guy. This is a GOOD MAN. The rest of them: fuck 'em!
If there's one thing you'll guarantee when you pick on the poor, you will likely never get a comeback (because at least here, the poor for the most part, don't have home internet access). And that is the definition of coward.
So we have two threads from one guy today:
1. Why babies are irritating on flights
2. A thread ripping into the majority of food stamp recipients.
These are real winners. Keep 'em coming you happy-go-lucky guy!
Like it or not, this person is NOT the face of food stamps. This is a small minority, and this is how the press offers it us we, the sheeple. MOST food stamp recipients are slugs, leeches, lazy scum who think it the government (our money) owe them this. I was in the food industry for 18 years. Witnessed the abuse first hand.
After I see the first two sentences, I was just about to agree with him in amazement.
A mere two sentences later, he digs himself a hole and buries himself in it.
Yes, MOST of these bastards are scum. The majority. Because he knows the majority. Because he was in the 'food industry' (whatever that means) in one city in America.
Now he can speak for MOST people on food stamps and how they are lazy bastards.
But not this ONE guy. This is a GOOD MAN. The rest of them: fuck 'em!
If there's one thing you'll guarantee when you pick on the poor, you will likely never get a comeback (because at least here, the poor for the most part, don't have home internet access). And that is the definition of coward.
So we have two threads from one guy today:
1. Why babies are irritating on flights
2. A thread ripping into the majority of food stamp recipients.
These are real winners. Keep 'em coming you happy-go-lucky guy!
"Yes, MOST of these bastards are scum. The majority. Because he
knows the majority. Because he was in the 'food industry' (whatever that
means) in one city in America.
Now he can speak for MOST people on food stamps and how they are lazy bastards."
Scal -- wouldn't the opposite be applicable as well? i.e., you couldn't speak for the majority either, could you?
0
"Yes, MOST of these bastards are scum. The majority. Because he
knows the majority. Because he was in the 'food industry' (whatever that
means) in one city in America.
Now he can speak for MOST people on food stamps and how they are lazy bastards."
Scal -- wouldn't the opposite be applicable as well? i.e., you couldn't speak for the majority either, could you?
"Yes, MOST of these bastards are scum. The majority. Because he
knows the majority. Because he was in the 'food industry' (whatever that
means) in one city in America.
Now he can speak for MOST people on food stamps and how they are lazy bastards."
Scal -- wouldn't the opposite be applicable as well? i.e., you couldn't speak for the majority either, could you?
I'm not. The burden of proof is upon him to upon him since he is making the claim of defamation. So prove it!
I beg of him to prove that the majority of food stamp recipients are "slugs, leeches, and lazy scum, who believe the government (our money) owes them this."
He's got a lot of research and opinion polling to do! (unless of course he researches such a thing and finds it to be true, which he won't).
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
"Yes, MOST of these bastards are scum. The majority. Because he
knows the majority. Because he was in the 'food industry' (whatever that
means) in one city in America.
Now he can speak for MOST people on food stamps and how they are lazy bastards."
Scal -- wouldn't the opposite be applicable as well? i.e., you couldn't speak for the majority either, could you?
I'm not. The burden of proof is upon him to upon him since he is making the claim of defamation. So prove it!
I beg of him to prove that the majority of food stamp recipients are "slugs, leeches, and lazy scum, who believe the government (our money) owes them this."
He's got a lot of research and opinion polling to do! (unless of course he researches such a thing and finds it to be true, which he won't).
scal if you really don't understanding and realize that foodstamps just like the welfare system is used and abused then you are the most ignorant human being on the face of this earth. Go spend 1 day in your local grocery story.
0
scal if you really don't understanding and realize that foodstamps just like the welfare system is used and abused then you are the most ignorant human being on the face of this earth. Go spend 1 day in your local grocery story.
he isnt able to prove it scal...just as you wouldnt be able to
Again, I don't need to. The burden of proof is on him. People ending up at the bottom of the economic ladder is a natural consequence of capitalism with social safety nets to support them at the bottom of the economic ladder.
He says he believes most think the government owes them this. Where is the polling figures that prove this. Are they his personal polls which he constructed in his head when he saw some people abusing the system vs. most people?
Of course, it's a ludicrous statement. He's saying it because he believesthey think it but would never admit to it.
Now what would give him that power?
The fact that he is a middle-class individual who was given opportunity solely do to good fortune/blessings (whatever you want to call it)? Now he can dictate what is in poor people's heads?
We don't choose our parents. Regardless of economic mobility (which is much more constrained in this country after the financial crises of '08) or stories about people moving up the economic ladder, if you are born into poverty it is likely that you will remain in poverty. The same goes for middle-class individuals. The schools you will attend will be worse. The neighborhoods will be unsuitable for development and meaningful prosperous habitation because there will be no tax base and 'crime' (as the law constructs it) will be a daily occurrence. Your peers will be people in a similar circumstance with a sense of hopelessness in an environment unsuitable for growth.
Now you can stand at a podium like the GOP candidates and holler "prosperity for all!" but statistics don't lie. The economic state you were born into is likely the state you will remain in given the above.
So I will repeat this again Koaj. The dissemination of food stamps from a government is a natural function of a responsible industrialized nation to ensure the poor aren't rummaging through local dumps as seen in Mumbai for exampe (an example of a government that largely ignores and fails to fund such problems).
But that in no way makes them believe they are OWED food stamps. It is a 'free lunch' and in an economy of 20%+ real unemployment, 20%+ of people seeking a job WON'T find a job because that job doesn't exist. And fortunately, at a minimum, the government won't let these people starve or panhandle the country over for money they otherwise wouldn't have.
So when this dickhead bandit makes such a claim, you can be damned sure I'll be there to chuck that shit right back in his face and make a fool of him. The burden of proof is on him. So again, I say prove your allegations!
0
Quote Originally Posted by KOAJ:
he isnt able to prove it scal...just as you wouldnt be able to
Again, I don't need to. The burden of proof is on him. People ending up at the bottom of the economic ladder is a natural consequence of capitalism with social safety nets to support them at the bottom of the economic ladder.
He says he believes most think the government owes them this. Where is the polling figures that prove this. Are they his personal polls which he constructed in his head when he saw some people abusing the system vs. most people?
Of course, it's a ludicrous statement. He's saying it because he believesthey think it but would never admit to it.
Now what would give him that power?
The fact that he is a middle-class individual who was given opportunity solely do to good fortune/blessings (whatever you want to call it)? Now he can dictate what is in poor people's heads?
We don't choose our parents. Regardless of economic mobility (which is much more constrained in this country after the financial crises of '08) or stories about people moving up the economic ladder, if you are born into poverty it is likely that you will remain in poverty. The same goes for middle-class individuals. The schools you will attend will be worse. The neighborhoods will be unsuitable for development and meaningful prosperous habitation because there will be no tax base and 'crime' (as the law constructs it) will be a daily occurrence. Your peers will be people in a similar circumstance with a sense of hopelessness in an environment unsuitable for growth.
Now you can stand at a podium like the GOP candidates and holler "prosperity for all!" but statistics don't lie. The economic state you were born into is likely the state you will remain in given the above.
So I will repeat this again Koaj. The dissemination of food stamps from a government is a natural function of a responsible industrialized nation to ensure the poor aren't rummaging through local dumps as seen in Mumbai for exampe (an example of a government that largely ignores and fails to fund such problems).
But that in no way makes them believe they are OWED food stamps. It is a 'free lunch' and in an economy of 20%+ real unemployment, 20%+ of people seeking a job WON'T find a job because that job doesn't exist. And fortunately, at a minimum, the government won't let these people starve or panhandle the country over for money they otherwise wouldn't have.
So when this dickhead bandit makes such a claim, you can be damned sure I'll be there to chuck that shit right back in his face and make a fool of him. The burden of proof is on him. So again, I say prove your allegations!
scal if you really don't understanding and realize that foodstamps just like the welfare system is used and abused then you are the most ignorant human being on the face of this earth. Go spend 1 day in your local grocery story.
You're clueless. People are on welfare because they have to be. WHERE ARE THE JOBS? You can't take a minimum wage job for $7.50 part time when you have a mortgage payment. You will take unemployment insurance (which is likened to welfare at times) because that is a rational economic decision. Like politicians EVERYONE games the system. But the poor are the easiest targets, that is why they are attacked.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sean2114:
scal if you really don't understanding and realize that foodstamps just like the welfare system is used and abused then you are the most ignorant human being on the face of this earth. Go spend 1 day in your local grocery story.
You're clueless. People are on welfare because they have to be. WHERE ARE THE JOBS? You can't take a minimum wage job for $7.50 part time when you have a mortgage payment. You will take unemployment insurance (which is likened to welfare at times) because that is a rational economic decision. Like politicians EVERYONE games the system. But the poor are the easiest targets, that is why they are attacked.
As I read this post I am standing in the self check out line at a large chain grocery store. Woman standing in front of me has cart contents of 2 cases of milwaukees best, what appears to be about 15 donuts in a box, 2 boxes of poptarts, rottis. chicken, loaf of bread and bag of m&m's. Beer is paid in cash and rest is paid with govt card. Said woman is extemely overweight and wearing purple pants.
0
As I read this post I am standing in the self check out line at a large chain grocery store. Woman standing in front of me has cart contents of 2 cases of milwaukees best, what appears to be about 15 donuts in a box, 2 boxes of poptarts, rottis. chicken, loaf of bread and bag of m&m's. Beer is paid in cash and rest is paid with govt card. Said woman is extemely overweight and wearing purple pants.
You're clueless. People are on welfare because they have to be. WHERE ARE THE JOBS? You can't take a minimum wage job for $7.50 part time when you have a mortgage payment. You will take unemployment insurance (which is likened to welfare at times) because that is a rational economic decision. Like politicians EVERYONE games the system. But the poor are the easiest targets, that is why they are attacked.
Please tell me your not serious. Do you actually believe the words that you type on this site? I have to imagine you just do it for shock value.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
You're clueless. People are on welfare because they have to be. WHERE ARE THE JOBS? You can't take a minimum wage job for $7.50 part time when you have a mortgage payment. You will take unemployment insurance (which is likened to welfare at times) because that is a rational economic decision. Like politicians EVERYONE games the system. But the poor are the easiest targets, that is why they are attacked.
Please tell me your not serious. Do you actually believe the words that you type on this site? I have to imagine you just do it for shock value.
You're clueless. People are on welfare because they have to be. WHERE ARE THE JOBS? You can't take a minimum wage job for $7.50 part time when you have a mortgage payment. You will take unemployment insurance (which is likened to welfare at times) because that is a rational economic decision. Like politicians EVERYONE games the system. But the poor are the easiest targets, that is why they are attacked.
You're clueless. People are on welfare because they have to be. WHERE ARE THE JOBS? You can't take a minimum wage job for $7.50 part time when you have a mortgage payment. You will take unemployment insurance (which is likened to welfare at times) because that is a rational economic decision. Like politicians EVERYONE games the system. But the poor are the easiest targets, that is why they are attacked.
In any large group or set of variables you will have many outside the mean in both directions and the large group which makes the mean.
Of course there are morons who abuse the system, but that does not mean the link above has any merit or that you can draw such sweeping, general conclusions like they did.
0
Its called human nature.
In any large group or set of variables you will have many outside the mean in both directions and the large group which makes the mean.
Of course there are morons who abuse the system, but that does not mean the link above has any merit or that you can draw such sweeping, general conclusions like they did.
The ultimate proof that MOST people who are on welfare abuse it.
Because of this one article that this buffoon posts.
Post another... and another... post 50 more. There are over FORTY SIX million people on food stamps. You'll only be 22,999,951 from achieving your goal of proving MOST people are abusing the system (which isn't even the issue here since the OP claimed they felt they were entitled to it so I'm not even sure you know what you are talking about).
I hope you didn't write history papers like this in high school. You hand in a research paper with ONE citation on it, you'll find yourself without a cap and tassel.
The ultimate proof that MOST people who are on welfare abuse it.
Because of this one article that this buffoon posts.
Post another... and another... post 50 more. There are over FORTY SIX million people on food stamps. You'll only be 22,999,951 from achieving your goal of proving MOST people are abusing the system (which isn't even the issue here since the OP claimed they felt they were entitled to it so I'm not even sure you know what you are talking about).
I hope you didn't write history papers like this in high school. You hand in a research paper with ONE citation on it, you'll find yourself without a cap and tassel.
In any large group or set of variables you will have many outside the mean in both directions and the large group which makes the mean.
Of course there are morons who abuse the system, but that does not mean the link above has any merit or that you can draw such sweeping, general conclusions like they did.
He has no fucking idea what mean means!! Language like that is not helping!
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Its called human nature.
In any large group or set of variables you will have many outside the mean in both directions and the large group which makes the mean.
Of course there are morons who abuse the system, but that does not mean the link above has any merit or that you can draw such sweeping, general conclusions like they did.
He has no fucking idea what mean means!! Language like that is not helping!
As I read this post I am standing in the self check out line at a large chain grocery store. Woman standing in front of me has cart contents of 2 cases of milwaukees best, what appears to be about 15 donuts in a box, 2 boxes of poptarts, rottis. chicken, loaf of bread and bag of m&m's. Beer is paid in cash and rest is paid with govt card. Said woman is extemely overweight and wearing purple pants.
Thanks man.
0
Quote Originally Posted by potter36:
As I read this post I am standing in the self check out line at a large chain grocery store. Woman standing in front of me has cart contents of 2 cases of milwaukees best, what appears to be about 15 donuts in a box, 2 boxes of poptarts, rottis. chicken, loaf of bread and bag of m&m's. Beer is paid in cash and rest is paid with govt card. Said woman is extemely overweight and wearing purple pants.
The ultimate proof that MOST people who are on welfare abuse it.
Because of this one article that this buffoon posts.
Post another... and another... post 50 more. There are over FORTY SIX million people on food stamps. You'll only be 22,999,951 from achieving your goal of proving MOST people are abusing the system (which isn't even the issue here since the OP claimed they felt they were entitled to it so I'm not even sure you know what you are talking about).
I hope you didn't write history papers like this in high school. You hand in a research paper with ONE citation on it, you'll find yourself without a cap and tassel.
You said "People are on welfare because they have to be" so I showed you an article that proves that is not the case. You didn't like the last guy posting without proof, now i post with proof and you don't like that, Not sure what to tell you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Well there ya have it folks.
The ultimate proof that MOST people who are on welfare abuse it.
Because of this one article that this buffoon posts.
Post another... and another... post 50 more. There are over FORTY SIX million people on food stamps. You'll only be 22,999,951 from achieving your goal of proving MOST people are abusing the system (which isn't even the issue here since the OP claimed they felt they were entitled to it so I'm not even sure you know what you are talking about).
I hope you didn't write history papers like this in high school. You hand in a research paper with ONE citation on it, you'll find yourself without a cap and tassel.
You said "People are on welfare because they have to be" so I showed you an article that proves that is not the case. You didn't like the last guy posting without proof, now i post with proof and you don't like that, Not sure what to tell you.
In any large group or set of variables you will have many outside the mean in both directions and the large group which makes the mean.
Of course there are morons who abuse the system, but that does not mean the link above has any merit or that you can draw such sweeping, general conclusions like they did.
I would agree the article above is an extereme but there are still plenty of people that are on wellfare that don't need to be. Go ask an EMS worker how many people abuse the system in this country. It is rampant and their is no amount of name calling that scal can do to prevent it from being true.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Its called human nature.
In any large group or set of variables you will have many outside the mean in both directions and the large group which makes the mean.
Of course there are morons who abuse the system, but that does not mean the link above has any merit or that you can draw such sweeping, general conclusions like they did.
I would agree the article above is an extereme but there are still plenty of people that are on wellfare that don't need to be. Go ask an EMS worker how many people abuse the system in this country. It is rampant and their is no amount of name calling that scal can do to prevent it from being true.
After I see the first two sentences, I was just about to agree with him in amazement.
A mere two sentences later, he digs himself a hole and buries himself in it.
Yes, MOST of these bastards are scum. The majority. Because he knows the majority. Because he was in the 'food industry' (whatever that means) in one city in America.
Now he can speak for MOST people on food stamps and how they are lazy bastards.
But not this ONE guy. This is a GOOD MAN. The rest of them: fuck 'em!
If there's one thing you'll guarantee when you pick on the poor, you will likely never get a comeback (because at least here, the poor for the most part, don't have home internet access). And that is the definition of coward.
So we have two threads from one guy today:
1. Why babies are irritating on flights
2. A thread ripping into the majority of food stamp recipients.
These are real winners. Keep 'em coming you happy-go-lucky guy!
Looks like you've got a stalker bandit
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
After I see the first two sentences, I was just about to agree with him in amazement.
A mere two sentences later, he digs himself a hole and buries himself in it.
Yes, MOST of these bastards are scum. The majority. Because he knows the majority. Because he was in the 'food industry' (whatever that means) in one city in America.
Now he can speak for MOST people on food stamps and how they are lazy bastards.
But not this ONE guy. This is a GOOD MAN. The rest of them: fuck 'em!
If there's one thing you'll guarantee when you pick on the poor, you will likely never get a comeback (because at least here, the poor for the most part, don't have home internet access). And that is the definition of coward.
So we have two threads from one guy today:
1. Why babies are irritating on flights
2. A thread ripping into the majority of food stamp recipients.
These are real winners. Keep 'em coming you happy-go-lucky guy!
You said "People are on welfare because they have to be" so I showed you an article that proves that is not the case. You didn't like the last guy posting without proof, now i post with proof and you don't like that, Not sure what to tell you.
In general, people are on welfare because they have to be and take the support from the government because it is a rational economic decision. In the same paragraph I myself admitted:
Like politicians, EVERYONE games the system.
Then you show me an example of one person guilty of fraud and somehow your point in proven. I said as much in my post before yours. But again, it can't be used as a broad condemnation of the majority.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sean2114:
You said "People are on welfare because they have to be" so I showed you an article that proves that is not the case. You didn't like the last guy posting without proof, now i post with proof and you don't like that, Not sure what to tell you.
In general, people are on welfare because they have to be and take the support from the government because it is a rational economic decision. In the same paragraph I myself admitted:
Like politicians, EVERYONE games the system.
Then you show me an example of one person guilty of fraud and somehow your point in proven. I said as much in my post before yours. But again, it can't be used as a broad condemnation of the majority.
Before I even opened it I knew (and I'm sure other posters) that he'd be all over this thread.
I've never seen or heard anyone defend the welfare system as much as Scal.
I defend the poor and the welfare system is a necessity in the most prosperous nation on the planet. While flawed, that is not my focus. Broad denigration of the poor is. That is why I am commenting.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slobbasaurus:
Bandit, was this thread created to agitate Scal?
Before I even opened it I knew (and I'm sure other posters) that he'd be all over this thread.
I've never seen or heard anyone defend the welfare system as much as Scal.
I defend the poor and the welfare system is a necessity in the most prosperous nation on the planet. While flawed, that is not my focus. Broad denigration of the poor is. That is why I am commenting.
As I read this post I am standing in the self check out line at a large chain grocery store. Woman standing in front of me has cart contents of 2 cases of milwaukees best, what appears to be about 15 donuts in a box, 2 boxes of poptarts, rottis. chicken, loaf of bread and bag of m&m's. Beer is paid in cash and rest is paid with govt card. Said woman is extemely overweight and wearing purple pants.
Well why don't you tell us what she should buy.
Please, give us the food staples she should leave that store with.
Let's let the "defy the nanny state" poster be the nanny for the poor and their daily menu options.
(Note: He's even counting the number of donuts in a donut box and relaying it to the forums. Somehow he/we, the middle-class earners, have a right to tell this woman whether she can buy donuts. Earth to dickhead potter. Donuts usually come in a dozen. It is not unusual when buying donuts to buy around that number. What is unusual is you relaying it to the forum. As a matter of fact, it's fucking lunacy and speaks volumes about you and how you regard others who use EBT cards to buy their food.)
0
Quote Originally Posted by potter36:
As I read this post I am standing in the self check out line at a large chain grocery store. Woman standing in front of me has cart contents of 2 cases of milwaukees best, what appears to be about 15 donuts in a box, 2 boxes of poptarts, rottis. chicken, loaf of bread and bag of m&m's. Beer is paid in cash and rest is paid with govt card. Said woman is extemely overweight and wearing purple pants.
Well why don't you tell us what she should buy.
Please, give us the food staples she should leave that store with.
Let's let the "defy the nanny state" poster be the nanny for the poor and their daily menu options.
(Note: He's even counting the number of donuts in a donut box and relaying it to the forums. Somehow he/we, the middle-class earners, have a right to tell this woman whether she can buy donuts. Earth to dickhead potter. Donuts usually come in a dozen. It is not unusual when buying donuts to buy around that number. What is unusual is you relaying it to the forum. As a matter of fact, it's fucking lunacy and speaks volumes about you and how you regard others who use EBT cards to buy their food.)
As I read this post I am standing in the self check out line at a large chain grocery store. Woman standing in front of me has cart contents of 2 cases of milwaukees best, what appears to be about 15 donuts in a box, 2 boxes of poptarts, rottis. chicken, loaf of bread and bag of m&m's. Beer is paid in cash and rest is paid with govt card. Said woman is extemely overweight and wearing purple pants.
AMAZING... you are psychic too.
You KNOW with 100% certainty that the beer isn't going to a friend, neighbor or relative.
~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
0
Quote Originally Posted by potter36:
As I read this post I am standing in the self check out line at a large chain grocery store. Woman standing in front of me has cart contents of 2 cases of milwaukees best, what appears to be about 15 donuts in a box, 2 boxes of poptarts, rottis. chicken, loaf of bread and bag of m&m's. Beer is paid in cash and rest is paid with govt card. Said woman is extemely overweight and wearing purple pants.
AMAZING... you are psychic too.
You KNOW with 100% certainty that the beer isn't going to a friend, neighbor or relative.
You KNOW with 100% certainty that the beer isn't going to a friend, neighbor or relative.
Goose, not psychic...simply stating facts. I didn't state anything about what I know, simply 100% of what took place. I conveyed no opinion at all in that statement.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheGoldenGoose:
AMAZING... you are psychic too.
You KNOW with 100% certainty that the beer isn't going to a friend, neighbor or relative.
Goose, not psychic...simply stating facts. I didn't state anything about what I know, simply 100% of what took place. I conveyed no opinion at all in that statement.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
