Just needed a week off...played a couple games...and still juiced out. Kind of disgusted with my bets and that there's some things I just never learn. Might be time to close up shop if this week sucks but I won't bother bitchin' about it...
Nebraska -6 @ Northwestern
Revenge, bounceback, bye week...an entire page of vocabulary in Nebraska's favor. Lately, this defense needs to have a shitty game, get yelled at for a week or two from Pelini, and then they step it up. NW won last year...that always helps. 2 weeks to prepare always helps. The OL could use a bounce back game as well. They had a few penalties @ Ohio St after playing pretty well in the prior games. So...both sides of the ball got their asses kicked by Pelini. Pelini has already said Burkhead will play. (Per Omaha.com) He's clearly not 100% but Ameer Abdullah is a fine backup.
Georgia -28 @ Kentucky
One of the worst pass defenses vs a big play offense quarterbacked by an NFL talent. Maybe UK's entire safety corp will be injured this week, too. Yeah...a 4 TD road fave. This pick has to be the capping equivalent of "suicide by cop."
Michigan State +11 @ Michigan
UM is on a roll and looks awesome but Purdue and Illinois will do that to your team. MST has the talent to contain Robinson. They keep it within a score.
Penn State +3 -115 @ Iowa
Penn st never gives up...that's all I'm looking for right now. Iowa is well coached but still might feel good about beating MST last week. Teams that are satisfied are usually flat.
Wyoming @ Fresno State -15'
Fresno St hasn't been able to INT the ball...ever. This year, they already have 13. Huge improvement in pass def. Brett Smith is a gunslinger and will sling one or two to The Bulldogs.
South Carolina +3 -105 @ Florida
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
1-1 last week, 32-30 total
Just needed a week off...played a couple games...and still juiced out. Kind of disgusted with my bets and that there's some things I just never learn. Might be time to close up shop if this week sucks but I won't bother bitchin' about it...
Nebraska -6 @ Northwestern
Revenge, bounceback, bye week...an entire page of vocabulary in Nebraska's favor. Lately, this defense needs to have a shitty game, get yelled at for a week or two from Pelini, and then they step it up. NW won last year...that always helps. 2 weeks to prepare always helps. The OL could use a bounce back game as well. They had a few penalties @ Ohio St after playing pretty well in the prior games. So...both sides of the ball got their asses kicked by Pelini. Pelini has already said Burkhead will play. (Per Omaha.com) He's clearly not 100% but Ameer Abdullah is a fine backup.
Georgia -28 @ Kentucky
One of the worst pass defenses vs a big play offense quarterbacked by an NFL talent. Maybe UK's entire safety corp will be injured this week, too. Yeah...a 4 TD road fave. This pick has to be the capping equivalent of "suicide by cop."
Michigan State +11 @ Michigan
UM is on a roll and looks awesome but Purdue and Illinois will do that to your team. MST has the talent to contain Robinson. They keep it within a score.
Penn State +3 -115 @ Iowa
Penn st never gives up...that's all I'm looking for right now. Iowa is well coached but still might feel good about beating MST last week. Teams that are satisfied are usually flat.
Wyoming @ Fresno State -15'
Fresno St hasn't been able to INT the ball...ever. This year, they already have 13. Huge improvement in pass def. Brett Smith is a gunslinger and will sling one or two to The Bulldogs.
UM is on a
roll and looks awesome but Purdue and Illinois will do that to your
team. MST has the talent to contain Robinson. They keep it within a
score.
I don't understand why/how this line is +11. Tons of value on the spartans. This is a day game right?
0
Michigan State +11 @ Michigan
UM is on a
roll and looks awesome but Purdue and Illinois will do that to your
team. MST has the talent to contain Robinson. They keep it within a
score.
I don't understand why/how this line is +11. Tons of value on the spartans. This is a day game right?
Laroja - Just looked it up to be sure...still scheduled for 3:30 EST. Agree the line looks too large. I'm guessing it's because Michigan has been rolling over teams with no defenses. Guess that's expected to continue vs a team with a D? Good thing we know better than that... On another note...your new avatar breaks my heart. I miss the lesbos! (Hell...I can't be an adult ALL the time.) Anyway, we get to see the NFL shield in more spots. Good luck this week.
mws - Cool, glad to be on 3 of the same plays. The Fresno St line looked a little weird. I don't pay attention to every line but I don't remember too many -15'.
0
Boom_Boom; no doubt you'll get rolling. Good luck
Laroja - Just looked it up to be sure...still scheduled for 3:30 EST. Agree the line looks too large. I'm guessing it's because Michigan has been rolling over teams with no defenses. Guess that's expected to continue vs a team with a D? Good thing we know better than that... On another note...your new avatar breaks my heart. I miss the lesbos! (Hell...I can't be an adult ALL the time.) Anyway, we get to see the NFL shield in more spots. Good luck this week.
mws - Cool, glad to be on 3 of the same plays. The Fresno St line looked a little weird. I don't pay attention to every line but I don't remember too many -15'.
4 totals I like...if you like 'em just wait...they'll obviously all move in the direction that gets you a better number.
Minnesota @ Wisconsin UNDER 45
Wake Forest @ Virginia UNDER 53 WF will just hang around and play conservative until VA makes a mistake. The mistake will eventually come. A good reason to consider WF +3'.
BYU @ Notre Dame UNDER 41' First one to 6 wins.
Kansas State @ West Virginia OVER 72' I really hate totals this high but I will just fire all the guns this week.
That might be it for games this week. If I add anything, it'll be from this list of leans:
Ball St -3
WF +3'
Cincy -7, situation favors Toledo but I like Cincinnati. I like the CIN DL to be disruptive as hell. I think that style will prevent the players from coming out flat on defense. Now what about offense? Might be worth a look at the under. I can see Toledo's defense fired up and the Cinci offense flat.
Indy +3 was going to play it..then saw their rush defense stats. Umm...maybe not.
LVille -7 Bridgewater could go crazy in this game. USF DB's don't secure INT's very well. He could toss the pass right at their chests and the ball would harmlessly bounce off.
0
4 totals I like...if you like 'em just wait...they'll obviously all move in the direction that gets you a better number.
Minnesota @ Wisconsin UNDER 45
Wake Forest @ Virginia UNDER 53 WF will just hang around and play conservative until VA makes a mistake. The mistake will eventually come. A good reason to consider WF +3'.
BYU @ Notre Dame UNDER 41' First one to 6 wins.
Kansas State @ West Virginia OVER 72' I really hate totals this high but I will just fire all the guns this week.
That might be it for games this week. If I add anything, it'll be from this list of leans:
Ball St -3
WF +3'
Cincy -7, situation favors Toledo but I like Cincinnati. I like the CIN DL to be disruptive as hell. I think that style will prevent the players from coming out flat on defense. Now what about offense? Might be worth a look at the under. I can see Toledo's defense fired up and the Cinci offense flat.
Indy +3 was going to play it..then saw their rush defense stats. Umm...maybe not.
LVille -7 Bridgewater could go crazy in this game. USF DB's don't secure INT's very well. He could toss the pass right at their chests and the ball would harmlessly bounce off.
The line on MSU/Mich is so high b/c MSU can't score. I agree 100% that MSU is A TON better defensively than Purdue & ILL, but Michigan will get into the endzone a time or two, and maybe a FG or two. I'm not sure if MSU will find the endzone more than once? Their offense is really bad. This score could easily be 20-6. 24-10.
Plus, you gotta factor in that Michigan has been beaten four years in a row by MSU. They will be pretty jacked themselves for the game.
0
The line on MSU/Mich is so high b/c MSU can't score. I agree 100% that MSU is A TON better defensively than Purdue & ILL, but Michigan will get into the endzone a time or two, and maybe a FG or two. I'm not sure if MSU will find the endzone more than once? Their offense is really bad. This score could easily be 20-6. 24-10.
Plus, you gotta factor in that Michigan has been beaten four years in a row by MSU. They will be pretty jacked themselves for the game.
Nasty lookahead for UGA. But Kentucky might just be that bad.
I think the Iowa line is inflated because they've kinda been Penn State's daddy over the last 5 or 10 years. Or at least it seems that way. Nittanys always bring out the best in the Hawkeyes.
Don't really disagree with anything else you have, although Sparty is the only one I feel strongly about.
0
Nasty lookahead for UGA. But Kentucky might just be that bad.
I think the Iowa line is inflated because they've kinda been Penn State's daddy over the last 5 or 10 years. Or at least it seems that way. Nittanys always bring out the best in the Hawkeyes.
Don't really disagree with anything else you have, although Sparty is the only one I feel strongly about.
Hey doubleup; thanks. (Answered the Syr question in doubleup's thread...) I might play Ball St because of your thread...
rLp - I do expect UM to win and break the streak. I'm thinking Hoke wants a conservative game plan & he just wants Robinson to protect the ball. So I think it'll be more of a struggle. Like a 17-9 type score; a field goal battle...
I'm not on the under because there's still a chance Denard gives the game away by chucking and ducking like the ND game. I can see a scenario where the Mich St defense could outscore their own offense. (But not counting on that, of course.)
Arid_Torpor - Ahh, the cocktail party. Actually, I'm not thrilled about them playing FLA next week. But I just decided to say to hell with it...GA is coming off a bye week and wants to hit someone. Maybe UK doesn't hit back. UK had a couple WR's give up on plays in the 2nd half of the FLA game.
shakey12381 - best of luck to you too.
0
Hey doubleup; thanks. (Answered the Syr question in doubleup's thread...) I might play Ball St because of your thread...
rLp - I do expect UM to win and break the streak. I'm thinking Hoke wants a conservative game plan & he just wants Robinson to protect the ball. So I think it'll be more of a struggle. Like a 17-9 type score; a field goal battle...
I'm not on the under because there's still a chance Denard gives the game away by chucking and ducking like the ND game. I can see a scenario where the Mich St defense could outscore their own offense. (But not counting on that, of course.)
Arid_Torpor - Ahh, the cocktail party. Actually, I'm not thrilled about them playing FLA next week. But I just decided to say to hell with it...GA is coming off a bye week and wants to hit someone. Maybe UK doesn't hit back. UK had a couple WR's give up on plays in the 2nd half of the FLA game.
Typically I would 100% agree with you. However, Michigan won't be able to stay conservative. You can bet that Dantonio will do one thing.. .. make Denard beat them with the pass. They WILL NOT let that kid run around making plays with his feet. I know what your retort will be: Denard can't throw so you should be safe with the 11. And trust me, I agree with that. The kid can't throw. That said, for some reason, he always throws the ball much MUCH better at home. Case in point, his last two home games last year v Nebraska & Ohio State, the kid was lights out.
I honestly think (and I can't believe I'm about to say this) that the kid is going to have a good day throwing the ball b/c MSU is going to make sure he doesn't run. I see a lot of 1 on 1 match ups with Gardner, Funchess & Roundtree (and they will sprinkle in a little bit of Gallon on some slip screens).
Just my 2 cents.
0
Cuse.
Typically I would 100% agree with you. However, Michigan won't be able to stay conservative. You can bet that Dantonio will do one thing.. .. make Denard beat them with the pass. They WILL NOT let that kid run around making plays with his feet. I know what your retort will be: Denard can't throw so you should be safe with the 11. And trust me, I agree with that. The kid can't throw. That said, for some reason, he always throws the ball much MUCH better at home. Case in point, his last two home games last year v Nebraska & Ohio State, the kid was lights out.
I honestly think (and I can't believe I'm about to say this) that the kid is going to have a good day throwing the ball b/c MSU is going to make sure he doesn't run. I see a lot of 1 on 1 match ups with Gardner, Funchess & Roundtree (and they will sprinkle in a little bit of Gallon on some slip screens).
rLp - True. QB's are better at home and the ND game I referenced was on the road. OK, the disagreement is how efficient Denard will be this week.
I still wonder if Hoke trusts Robinson but it sounds like you have a better read on that situation than I do...
It's so much easier to disagree with an adult. At least neither of us will be posting burning bags of money in the others' thread on Sunday morning. GL this week.
Examiner 2009
shakey12381 - I didn't give that total a thought when I looked at that game. Nothing really stood out but I'll give it another look. Thanks.
0
rLp - True. QB's are better at home and the ND game I referenced was on the road. OK, the disagreement is how efficient Denard will be this week.
I still wonder if Hoke trusts Robinson but it sounds like you have a better read on that situation than I do...
It's so much easier to disagree with an adult. At least neither of us will be posting burning bags of money in the others' thread on Sunday morning. GL this week.
Examiner 2009
shakey12381 - I didn't give that total a thought when I looked at that game. Nothing really stood out but I'll give it another look. Thanks.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.