All Forums | College Football

Does Anyone Else Think That FG Was Good???

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 860
Posts: 21
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 3294
Posted: #1

I'm glad to see the upset...always special and exciting....but man o man I watched the reply of that FG that was called no good about 20 times and it sure looked good to me.

Shocked noone else has brought that up.....maybe I'm just blinder then I thought

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 536
Posted: #2
i thought it was good.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 983
Posted: #3
Looked good from the replay camera angle. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 12309
Posted: #4
They said it's gotta go inside the goal post.  It went directly over over.

FG = No Good
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 3294
Posted: #5

I thought they were able to review kicks? For as important and close as that was, I'm shocked they didn't.

Congrats to Iowa St for one hell of a game either way...but still think it was good

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #6
I thought it was good as well. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 4731
Posted: #7
No good
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33640
Posted: #8
I don't know why they did not review it. I notice one of the replay official I know is working for Vegas...LOL.J/K
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 11273
Posted: #9
They should use laser and shoot it up to extend that goal post.


X_____________________________
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 12237
Posted: #10
hard to say.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 625
Posted: #11

Boise all over again.

 

Definitely looked good both times i watched the replay, certainly close enough for a review at least. "Nah fuck it we'll just say its no good and not review it LOL?"

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1182
Posted: #12
man fuck the upset. its only good every now n then..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 1538
Posted: #13
Nope...when they showed the replay it was from the outside looking in which made it look a lot better than it is.  This is an easy call for a ref standing under the post looking up and certainly nothing replay can do without an angle straight up the post.  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 1106
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by StevieY:

Boise all over again.

 

Definitely looked good both times i watched the replay, certainly close enough for a review at least. "Nah fuck it we'll just say its no good and not review it LOL?"


So let`s say it gets reviewed.  Is there conclusive evidence to overturn the call on the field?  Answer ---->  No


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 1106
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by MNFLoser:

Nope...when they showed the replay it was from the outside looking in which made it look a lot better than it is.  This is an easy call for a ref standing under the post looking up and certainly nothing replay can do without an angle straight up the post.  

This as well. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 625
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by RetainLane:


So let`s say it gets reviewed.  Is there conclusive evidence to overturn the call on the field?  Answer ---->  No


 

Clearly you got my point.....

 

Did i ever say if it got replayed it would be over turned? No i didnt. But ive seen a zillion plays that were nowhere near as close as that kick was get reviewed and now all of a sudden they just dont even think of reviewing it?

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 7191
Posted: #17

They didn't review it because the rules say it's not reviewable.  I thought it was probably good.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 3232
Posted: #18
thats as close as it gets.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 1106
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by StevieY:

 

Clearly you got my point.....

 

Did i ever say if it got replayed it would be over turned? No i didnt. But ive seen a zillion plays that were nowhere near as close as that kick was get reviewed and now all of a sudden they just dont even think of reviewing it?


My bad, sped through your post.  Anyway, if it is not a reviewable play as mws says, it`s a moot point. 
BOL this weekend. 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 7191
Posted: #20
Yeah, you can review it f the ball is not higher than the top of the goal posts when it goes past them, but you can't review it when the ball is higher than the top of the goal posts.
 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 17830
Posted: #21
I thought it was good at first glance and on replay. The crazy thing is, no replay could have possibly over turned whatever the call on the field was. If the refs ruled the kick good, it would have been tough to argue otherwise and nothing could have changed the ruling. 
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.