All Forums | College Football

Oregon got dominated by that SEC DEFENSE!!!!!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 435
Posts: 16
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 17
Posted: #1
go war eagles!!


 all u quack backers feeling like doo doo in the face!!!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 5779
Posted: #2
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 10398
Posted: #3
shit happens
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 1452
Posted: #4
different mentality & level of play  proof is in the pudding as they say
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1468
Posted: #5

Another dumb post by another ignorant poster.

People are forgetting that Oregon's D shut down Auburn's offense that was averaging 41 points a game coming in.

No mention of that right?

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1468
Posted: #6

Quote Originally Posted by player:

different mentality & level of play  proof is in the pudding as they say

Different level of play? What game did you watch last night??

Auburn and Oregon literally played each other to a standstill last night. No team dominated the other. The proof is in the pudding, and last night proved that the level of play was equal.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 1452
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by supadame:

Different level of play? What game did you watch last night??

Auburn and Oregon literally played each other to a standstill last night. No team dominated the other. The proof is in the pudding, and last night proved that the level of play was equal.

  one game  look at the season & level of comp.  anyone who knows football  could tell you that   can't go by one game  I guess jets shouldn't show up this weekend
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1468
Posted: #8

Quote Originally Posted by player:

  one game  look at the season & level of comp.  anyone who knows football  could tell you that   can't go by one game  I guess jets shouldn't show up this weekend

Right. I guess that's why the low level PAC 10 has 2 teams in the final top 4 slots of the AP poll.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 1452
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by supadame:

Right. I guess that's why the low level PAC 10 has 2 teams in the final top 4 slots of the AP poll.

  and you're probably the same guy who says the polls are full of shit  can't have it both ways
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1468
Posted: #10

Quote Originally Posted by player:

  and you're probably the same guy who says the polls are full of shit  can't have it both ways

Swing and a miss with this post.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 1452
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by supadame:

Swing and a miss with this post.

no answer my friend  I'm sure you are an honest person  guess I'm wrong  you're in favor of newspaper polls

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 12237
Posted: #12
How old are you lol.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 14174
Posted: #13
The final score was 22-19 on a last sec fg. How did one team dominate? Hardly. Oregon held down auburns offense as well
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 10296
Posted: #14
he's kinda right......dominated maybe not....since Ducks had 450 yds and 23 1st downs....
But both like to run mostly....
    Ducks av 305 yds/g .....and 6.1/rush.....in this game?
75 yds rushing and 2.3/rush
    Tigers av 287 rush/g ....and 6.2/rush....this game?
254 rushing and 5.1/rush....> Ducks did great job/caught Auburn in off day...but still allowed 519 yds and 28 1st downs !

Auburn was whipping their ass up front (defensively) and Kelly's stubborn attempts to run inside cost them the game......period.......on GL.....4 straight rushes inside (4th down with Barner up the gut?.....WTF?)  
and the safety.... also inside....were killers
It is better to be feared - than to be loved.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1468
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by player:

no answer my friend  I'm sure you are an honest person  guess I'm wrong  you're in favor of newspaper polls

Oregon fought Auburn to a draw pretty much. I'm 100 percent sure that Stanford, TCU and Boise woulda gave Auburn the fits in a head to head matchup.

Different mentality and level of play? I don't think so.

 

 

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 1452
Posted: #16
we can debate this all night   we will never know & can only assume who would have won a game  BOL to you
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.