As of now the public majority is screaming Stanford + Over. There is no doubt that Stanford will win and cover if they want to but that's not how Vegas operates. My heart is also on Stanford + Over but my mind is telling me to play VT + Under. The worst thing that can happen is 1 hit 1 loss. Break down of the odd combo that will hit:
Stanford + Over = 0%
Stanford + Under = 25%
VT + Over = 25%
VT + Under =50%
I just love it when people start posting stats to prove who is a better team. There is no better team according to Vegas. Stanford can favor by 30 points and if Vegas want them to cover then they can make it happen. On the other hands, if Stanford favor by 1 point they can lose it straight out if Vegas want them to. The spread is just a base line for bettors to place bet and Vegas will determine the outcome based on the who bet more or less. You do not have to agree with my take but it's all about $$$$$. Vegas =$$$$$$ and the house ALWAYS win!!!
Can it be proven games are fixed? That question is the same as asking what's the winning odd of an individual to fight against a multibillion industries.
It's too EASY to take Stanford + Over tonight.....so the question is, can it be that EASY? The best fixed game are the single game.







