Lance Lynn take the ball for the Redbirds, bringing along with it a 1-0 record and a 4.50ERA/1.40whip/.256BAA. Last year he recorded 18 wins, but his 1.32whip and .253BAA weren't outstanding. His career line vs Pitt is 2-1 with a 4.44ERA, and his career road line is 4.15/1.40/.277. Clearly he enjoys pitching at home better than on the road. Stl is in the bottom half of the league in .OPS and Lance Lynn allowed opponents to have a .728OPS against him last year (league leaders were in the .500s). Lastly, Stl closer Jason Motte is injured, forcing them to paste together the back end of their bullpen. They blew the save in such a situation yesterday allowing 4ER in 3IP.
MacDonald goes for the Pirates, bringing his 1-1 record to the mound along with a decent 3.75ERA and 1.00whip. Last year he posted 12 wins and had good whip at 1.26 and BAA at .233. He is 4-1 in his career vs STL with 2.27/1.08/.199. He was 6-2 at home last year with a 2.73/0.97/.199. Comparing MacDonald's opponent OPS, he came in at .714 last year. The Pirates offence is clicking, scoring over 5 runs per game over their last 6.
The stats show MacDonald as the better pitcher, pitching at home where he does well, against a pitcher that doesn't like the road or Pitt. Take the +1.5 runs for a cushion, and Take it to the Bank.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Yesterday 0-1 -1.78units Season 13-3, 17.51units
PITT +1.5 (1.60) vs Stl - risk 2 units to win 1.2
Lance Lynn take the ball for the Redbirds, bringing along with it a 1-0 record and a 4.50ERA/1.40whip/.256BAA. Last year he recorded 18 wins, but his 1.32whip and .253BAA weren't outstanding. His career line vs Pitt is 2-1 with a 4.44ERA, and his career road line is 4.15/1.40/.277. Clearly he enjoys pitching at home better than on the road. Stl is in the bottom half of the league in .OPS and Lance Lynn allowed opponents to have a .728OPS against him last year (league leaders were in the .500s). Lastly, Stl closer Jason Motte is injured, forcing them to paste together the back end of their bullpen. They blew the save in such a situation yesterday allowing 4ER in 3IP.
MacDonald goes for the Pirates, bringing his 1-1 record to the mound along with a decent 3.75ERA and 1.00whip. Last year he posted 12 wins and had good whip at 1.26 and BAA at .233. He is 4-1 in his career vs STL with 2.27/1.08/.199. He was 6-2 at home last year with a 2.73/0.97/.199. Comparing MacDonald's opponent OPS, he came in at .714 last year. The Pirates offence is clicking, scoring over 5 runs per game over their last 6.
The stats show MacDonald as the better pitcher, pitching at home where he does well, against a pitcher that doesn't like the road or Pitt. Take the +1.5 runs for a cushion, and Take it to the Bank.
Does the Madcapper on Randlethehandle know you copy his picks every day? .randallthehandle.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=17&start=10.
Did you even read the rest of the thread from yesterday? I am Madcapper. I have posted proof to this both on this site and on Randallthehandle. Please do a little research before you slander someone. Thanks.
0
Quote Originally Posted by whisperman:
Does the Madcapper on Randlethehandle know you copy his picks every day? .randallthehandle.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=17&start=10.
Did you even read the rest of the thread from yesterday? I am Madcapper. I have posted proof to this both on this site and on Randallthehandle. Please do a little research before you slander someone. Thanks.
yeah, +104 is the best i could get right now i'd play it at that as well, just want to wait and see what the line does
might take a shot at hellboy +132 even though their bats are ice cold not sold on dumpster, so this looks like value any thoughts?
Hellickson has been hit hard by Boston in his career...well, moreso he has been walked hard. less than a hit an inning but has issued around 4.5BB/9, good for a 1.42whip. Last year in 5 starts vs Bos he had a 4.71/1.47/.261 line. The +132 is nice for a TB team that does everything well, but I am not sold on 'hellboy' . Neither team has a decent bullpen so far this year either, but TB was 3rd best in majors last year in ERA.
That said, I don't trust Dempster either, which is why I'm staying away. Neither te
0
Quote Originally Posted by cpsn:
yeah, +104 is the best i could get right now i'd play it at that as well, just want to wait and see what the line does
might take a shot at hellboy +132 even though their bats are ice cold not sold on dumpster, so this looks like value any thoughts?
Hellickson has been hit hard by Boston in his career...well, moreso he has been walked hard. less than a hit an inning but has issued around 4.5BB/9, good for a 1.42whip. Last year in 5 starts vs Bos he had a 4.71/1.47/.261 line. The +132 is nice for a TB team that does everything well, but I am not sold on 'hellboy' . Neither team has a decent bullpen so far this year either, but TB was 3rd best in majors last year in ERA.
That said, I don't trust Dempster either, which is why I'm staying away. Neither te
Well I hope they win outright and I don't need the +1.5. Glad it got to +114 for you. I am only seeing +112 on one of my sites, and only +110 on the other 3. It's going to come down to pitching, as there are no changes in the regular lineups. Lets hope the stats play out the way they have in past.
0
Quote Originally Posted by cpsn:
locked in +114 for two units
now they just gotta come through
Well I hope they win outright and I don't need the +1.5. Glad it got to +114 for you. I am only seeing +112 on one of my sites, and only +110 on the other 3. It's going to come down to pitching, as there are no changes in the regular lineups. Lets hope the stats play out the way they have in past.
I still have -155 on three sites. The fact that your site has moved to -165 means they have got alot of money on Pitt and the line is moving, which supports the bet.
0
Quote Originally Posted by liontri:
It's at +1.5 -165 now. What do you think?
I still have -155 on three sites. The fact that your site has moved to -165 means they have got alot of money on Pitt and the line is moving, which supports the bet.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.