7-6, +1.05 yesterday. 423-287-40, +103.31 since June 14th.
All plays are 1 unit unless otherwise noted.
SEASON RECORD ML: 205-142, +47.44 units RL: 23-28-6, -8.29 units O/U: 205-200-26, -14.32 units Team Totals: 262-173-35, +72.83 units 1st-5 Sides: 9-3-2, +6.96 units 1st-5 Totals: 5-9-1, -5.11 units Season Total: 709-555-70, +100.51 units
Cards Team Total Over 5 (Keuchel/Westbrook) -110 Angels Team Total Over 4.5 (Wilson/Morales) -123
As always, GL to everyone.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
7-6, +1.05 yesterday. 423-287-40, +103.31 since June 14th.
All plays are 1 unit unless otherwise noted.
SEASON RECORD ML: 205-142, +47.44 units RL: 23-28-6, -8.29 units O/U: 205-200-26, -14.32 units Team Totals: 262-173-35, +72.83 units 1st-5 Sides: 9-3-2, +6.96 units 1st-5 Totals: 5-9-1, -5.11 units Season Total: 709-555-70, +100.51 units
Cards Team Total Over 5 (Keuchel/Westbrook) -110 Angels Team Total Over 4.5 (Wilson/Morales) -123
so let me get this straight. you have a winning record on money line and team totals but 1st-5 totals and 1st-5 sides you have a losing record and you pick two 1st-5 totals ------WHY ?
0
so let me get this straight. you have a winning record on money line and team totals but 1st-5 totals and 1st-5 sides you have a losing record and you pick two 1st-5 totals ------WHY ?
so let me get this straight. you have a winning record on money line and team totals but 1st-5 totals and 1st-5 sides you have a losing record and you pick two 1st-5 totals ------WHY ?
He didn't pick 2 first 5's totals
He picked 2 team totals for the game
Open your eyes before you start bitching at people
0
Quote Originally Posted by tomnolan:
so let me get this straight. you have a winning record on money line and team totals but 1st-5 totals and 1st-5 sides you have a losing record and you pick two 1st-5 totals ------WHY ?
He didn't pick 2 first 5's totals
He picked 2 team totals for the game
Open your eyes before you start bitching at people
so let me get this straight. you have a winning record on money line and team totals but 1st-5 totals and 1st-5 sides you have a losing record and you pick two 1st-5 totals ------WHY ?
Um...what makes you think my picks are 1st-5 totals?
0
Quote Originally Posted by tomnolan:
so let me get this straight. you have a winning record on money line and team totals but 1st-5 totals and 1st-5 sides you have a losing record and you pick two 1st-5 totals ------WHY ?
Um...what makes you think my picks are 1st-5 totals?
hahaha my jays line is set at 2.5 lol i dont think i can pull the trigger on that one....with you on the cards. I also bit on the cards RL. BOL WEEBLE. THANKS for your picks my man
0
hahaha my jays line is set at 2.5 lol i dont think i can pull the trigger on that one....with you on the cards. I also bit on the cards RL. BOL WEEBLE. THANKS for your picks my man
I would play the Over tm total for the Jays if the juice isn't thru the roof...Verlander usually gives up one or two in the early innings, especially (imo) when the tm he's going against also went against Scherzer previously (tuesday night). Two power pitchers w/ mean fastballs. Valverde (if he pitches today) is a heart attack waiting to happen and if Coke or Villareal (spelling error) take the bump, there's atleast another run. Definatly an action play imo....
GL Weebs
0
I would play the Over tm total for the Jays if the juice isn't thru the roof...Verlander usually gives up one or two in the early innings, especially (imo) when the tm he's going against also went against Scherzer previously (tuesday night). Two power pitchers w/ mean fastballs. Valverde (if he pitches today) is a heart attack waiting to happen and if Coke or Villareal (spelling error) take the bump, there's atleast another run. Definatly an action play imo....
Wow, the TT O/U for the Jays on 5dimes is 2 1/2. Weeble, would you still take the under?
I said I promised myself that I would take it no matter the line. What I should have said is I promised myself that I would take it no matter the line AS LONG AS IT'S NOT 2.5. So no...I definitely wouldn't take it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Oyzise:
Wow, the TT O/U for the Jays on 5dimes is 2 1/2. Weeble, would you still take the under?
I said I promised myself that I would take it no matter the line. What I should have said is I promised myself that I would take it no matter the line AS LONG AS IT'S NOT 2.5. So no...I definitely wouldn't take it.
I would play the Over tm total for the Jays if the juice isn't thru the roof...Verlander usually gives up one or two in the early innings, especially (imo) when the tm he's going against also went against Scherzer previously (tuesday night). Two power pitchers w/ mean fastballs. Valverde (if he pitches today) is a heart attack waiting to happen and if Coke or Villareal (spelling error) take the bump, there's atleast another run. Definatly an action play imo....
GL Weebs
I posted my pick on the team total under and you're telling me that I should play the over?
0
Quote Originally Posted by doliver517:
I would play the Over tm total for the Jays if the juice isn't thru the roof...Verlander usually gives up one or two in the early innings, especially (imo) when the tm he's going against also went against Scherzer previously (tuesday night). Two power pitchers w/ mean fastballs. Valverde (if he pitches today) is a heart attack waiting to happen and if Coke or Villareal (spelling error) take the bump, there's atleast another run. Definatly an action play imo....
GL Weebs
I posted my pick on the team total under and you're telling me that I should play the over?
I said I promised myself that I would take it no matter the line. What I should have said is I promised myself that I would take it no matter the line AS LONG AS IT'S NOT 2.5. So no...I definitely wouldn't take it.
Gotcha, thanks, friend.
0
Quote Originally Posted by weeble5672:
I said I promised myself that I would take it no matter the line. What I should have said is I promised myself that I would take it no matter the line AS LONG AS IT'S NOT 2.5. So no...I definitely wouldn't take it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.