The Tigers are 7-3 this year vs SP's with a whip >1.5...

Forum: MLB Betting Page 1 of 6  1 2 3 4 5   »
Author: [MLB Betting] Topic: The Tigers are 7-3 this year vs SP's with a whip >1.5...
oddsbuster PM oddsbuster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 20924
Ohio
 
oddsbuster
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:06:07 PM
Here's the supporting data:

4/8/12 vs Bos (Buchholz) whip=1.91... 13-12w
4/10/12 vs TB (Moore) whip=1.58... 5-2w
4/16/12 @ KC (Duffy) whip=1.59... 3-2w
4/18/12 @ KC (Sanchez) whip=1.86... 4-3w
4/27/12 @ NYY (Nova) whip=1.65... 6-7L
4/28/12 @ NYY (Garcia) whip=1.78... 7-5w
5/1/12 vs KC (Hochevar) whip=1.54... 9-3w
5/2/12 vs KC (Sanchez) whip=1.86... 2-3L
5/6/12 vs CHW (Axelrod) whip=1.57... 3-1w
5/16/12 vs Minn (Blackburn) whip=1.77... 7-11L

The Tigers are no where living up to the standards of the public just yet but there have certainly been some very profitable situations with them this year if you have been paying attention and doing your homework. As you can see on any standard stat sheet that the Tigers are scoring 4.39rpg (Which is better than more than half the league already #10) but they are averaging 5.9rpg when facing a SP with a whip greater than 1.5 this year. You will also notice that the Tigers are hitting .257ba as a team (Also better than more than half the league #10) but vs SP's with a whip greater than 1.5 they are batting .286 (100 for 350) as a team with 11hr's in 10 games (59 runs)...

With all this in mind guess who is in town tonight to face the Detroit Tigers? The Cleveland Indians who have lost 10 straight games to the Detroit Tigers as the Indians are sending Ubaldo Jimenez to the hill who just so happens to have a whip of 1.7 as he has allowed 46 hits in 46 innings pitched and walked a team high 32 batters as his bb/9 is a mind boggling 6.26. You will be hard pressed to find a another every 5 day starter with one that is higher than 5. 

Tonight's play is obviously on the Detroit Tigers as follows...

Det(-102)10u(Porcello/Jimenez)... 
utfootball4 PM utfootball4
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 20033
North Carolina
 
utfootball4
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:09:07 PM
bol
tinfoils PM tinfoils
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 50882
 
tinfoils
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:11:11 PM
Good luck odds!
ekrres PM ekrres
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5525
Slovakia
 
ekrres
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:13:06 PM

nbafan88 PM nbafan88
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 26893
New Jersey
 
nbafan88
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:15:14 PM
agreed
bail8gent PM bail8gent
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1037
Nevada
 
bail8gent
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:15:14 PM
BOL Odds
Epaminondas PM Epaminondas
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1817
Brazil
 
Epaminondas
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:15:43 PM
Take the Over then, because Porcello is pure garbage.
Nilshu PM Nilshu
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4264
Ontario
 
Nilshu
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:18:32 PM
BOL

TheMoneyTeam PM TheMoneyTeam
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 204
Texas
 
TheMoneyTeam
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:20:05 PM
Love it 
oddsbuster PM oddsbuster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 20924
Ohio
 
oddsbuster
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:27:11 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Epaminondas:

Take the Over then, because Porcello is pure garbage.
Yep Rick Porcello's 12-5 with a 2.92era in 18 career may starts is garbage! 
switchwalk PM switchwalk
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4731
Canada
 
switchwalk
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:29:14 PM
Porcello is not as bad as his numbers this year suggest 

BOL odds 
oddsbuster PM oddsbuster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 20924
Ohio
 
oddsbuster
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:34:53 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Epaminondas:

Take the Over then, because Porcello is pure garbage.
And just to touch base on an over play. I'm not against it but it's no where near as valued as playing the Tigers at -102. Especially when the Total is set at 9. Although 5 of these games saw runs scored at 10+rpg 5 of them also had runs scored of just 7, 5, 7, 5 & 4. I'd like to keep the value directed right at Mr. Ubaldo Jimenez...

That said I surely would not be playing the under in this game. Even at Comerica park...
capskip PM capskip
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 28308
Florida
 
capskip
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:38:36 PM
 gl odds
oddsbuster PM oddsbuster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 20924
Ohio
 
oddsbuster
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:43:18 PM
MLB wagering records this year:

Regular season:
MLB(rs)=124-116-3 -15.48u
yest=0-2 -7.625u
Parlays=0-1 -1u

Spring Training:
MLB(st)=52-38 +49.82u

Series wagers:
MLB series=1-4 -15.8u

Overall MLB Profit:
 +18.5u
ac_bum PM ac_bum
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 22673
District of
              Columbia
 
ac_bum
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:43:42 PM
 gl buster
oddsbuster PM oddsbuster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 20924
Ohio
 
oddsbuster
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:44:37 PM
Just for the record also all my MLB wagers this year have been on a 1-5u scale. I have stepped outside the 1-5u scale 1 time this year on a daily wager. That was back on 5/212 when I lost a RL-1.5 wager on the Tigers with JV vs Sanchez...

oddsbuster PM oddsbuster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 20924
Ohio
 
oddsbuster
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:45:47 PM
I have 1 pending series wager right now on the LAA(-145)5u...

Hopefully Wilson & Weaver can handle the next 2 games for me as they dropped the 1st game...
KingScorpio PM KingScorpio
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 19370
Nevada
 
KingScorpio
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:54:06 PM
Porcello's 5-1 lifetime record vs. CLV has red flagged this bet at PK'em 
GiLmo574 PM GiLmo574
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 21804
California
 
GiLmo574
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 2:58:23 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by oddsbuster:

Yep Rick Porcello's 12-5 with a 2.92era in 18 career may starts is garbage! 


The only monthly stat that holds any water is March/April  -  IMO.



I will be backing Porcello too, unfortunately.  Pure fade on Ubaldo.


oddsbuster PM oddsbuster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 20924
Ohio
 
oddsbuster
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 3:06:04 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by KingScorpio:

Porcello's 5-1 lifetime record vs. CLV has red flagged this bet at PK'em 
Don't worry KING, covers.com most likely had you red flagged on Nov. 2005 when you decided to sign up and start mocking the forum as much as possible. At least your wager tonight is based on people losing bets from last night... 
oddsbuster PM oddsbuster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 20924
Ohio
 
oddsbuster
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 3:07:09 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by nbafan88:

agreed
The one handshake or agreement I surely did not want to see, right here...
oddsbuster PM oddsbuster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 20924
Ohio
 
oddsbuster
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 3:10:31 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by GiLmo574:



The only monthly stat that holds any water is March/April  -  IMO.



I will be backing Porcello too, unfortunately.  Pure fade on Ubaldo.


I will speak mildly on this matter as I have been one of the bigger supporters of fading Ubaldo now for sometime. But I can't lie as his number's just statistically fell into a situation the a ceratain team has had most of their success from this year. If Ubaldo was playing a different team tonight there would be a very good chaance I would have been off the game...
GiLmo574 PM GiLmo574
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 21804
California
 
GiLmo574
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 3:22:21 PM
Odds - when I get back to the workshop I'll throw out my Ubaldo stat. And it involves his WHIP, too.
Posted using a mobile device.
nbafan88 PM nbafan88
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 26893
New Jersey
 
nbafan88
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 3:24:24 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by oddsbuster:

The one handshake or agreement I surely did not want to see, right here...


really don't understand why you act like a teenager

i respect your research and insight, grow up please.
oddsbuster PM oddsbuster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 20924
Ohio
 
oddsbuster
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/22/2012 3:32:40 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by oddsbuster:

And just to touch base on an over play. I'm not against it but it's no where near as valued as playing the Tigers at -102. Especially when the Total is set at 9. Although 5 of these games saw runs scored at 10+rpg 5 of them also had runs scored of just 7, 5, 7, 5 & 4. I'd like to keep the value directed right at Mr. Ubaldo Jimenez...

That said I surely would not be playing the under in this game. Even at Comerica park...
Obviously I meant Progressive park. The Tigers are 12-10-1 to the under at Comerica this year and the Indians are ironically also 12-10-1 to the under at there home park (Progressive Field). 
Forum: MLB Betting Page 1 of 6  1 2 3 4 5   »
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.