All Forums | MLB Betting Forum

The Fish will win by minimum 6 runs

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 11054
Posts: 162
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 18777
Posted: #1

LAD -1.5 +200

Zona +133

Stros -1.5 +180

O's +202

TB -1.5 +129

Indians +128

Fish -1.5 +142

All plays risk 2.5 except Fish risk 5 units

403-467 +169.01    Yesterday 3-4 +.4.09   I go 1 under on the day and still win money.  This is how you wager day in day out and methodically grind the proper way.

 

 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 1946
Posted: #2
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 3188
Posted: #3
big play on the fish again huh?

hope they pull through for you

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 1946
Posted: #4
when would you take a -2.5 line?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 871
Posted: #5

its a shame we are gonna lose you for football

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 50021
Posted: #6

''I Stand Alone" Godsmack...

U R The Lone Ranger,When correct U are a genius....

If Jake pitches well U have a shot...Carrasco will only win a 9-8 final,,,GL..165...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 3188
Posted: #7
how about the fact that carrasco is pitching for the tribe?

decent in the minors, total shit last year in the majors. 

why the tribe?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 18777
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by indiobear:

its a shame we are gonna lose you for football

 

I'm not going anywhere, losers are going to jump for football thinking now I will win money.  If you suck at one sport than you suck at all sports because the general principles for winning at any sport always stay the same. 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 16954
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:

I'm not going anywhere, losers are going to jump for football thinking now I will win money.  If you suck at one sport than you suck at all sports because the general principles for winning at any sport always stay the same. 



 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 18777
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by deegen:

how about the fact that carrasco is pitching for the tribe?

decent in the minors, total shit last year in the majors. 

why the tribe?

 

It's more a play on a excellent number I am getting because to take Garcia laying road chalk is comical.  It should be Indians or nothing.  Garcia has just as much chance of getting shelled as Carrasco.  You guys keep talking about Carrasco and how bad he is, well Garcia sucks just as much.  The Sox win this game at the very most 50% of the time.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 871
Posted: #11

Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:

I'm not going anywhere, losers are going to jump for football thinking now I will win money.  If you suck at one sport than you suck at all sports because the general principles for winning at any sport always stay the same. 

 

 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 740
Posted: #12
165 do you have a bigger bet every day? would that be your pick of the day type of pick? Also have you noticed if it has hit more than your other picks?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 871
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by indiobear:

 

 

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 10444
Posted: #14
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 1126
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:

LAD -1.5 +200

Zona +133

Stros -1.5 +180

O's +202

TB -1.5 +129

Indians +128

Fish -1.5 +142

All plays risk 2.5 except Fish risk 5 units

403-467 +169.01    Yesterday 3-4 +.4.09   I go 1 under on the day and still win money.  This is how you wager day in day out and methodically grind the proper way.

 

 

 



What's your take on the amount of games toplay?  Do you ever minimize your games played?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 3188
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:

It's more a play on a excellent number I am getting because to take Garcia laying road chalk is comical.  It should be Indians or nothing.  Garcia has just as much chance of getting shelled as Carrasco.  You guys keep talking about Carrasco and how bad he is, well Garcia sucks just as much.  The Sox win this game at the very most 50% of the time.


im playing the over, just wondering about your reasons on playing the tribe. just picking your brain man.

good luck today
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 1126
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:

It's more a play on a excellent number I am getting because to take Garcia laying road chalk is comical.  It should be Indians or nothing.  Garcia has just as much chance of getting shelled as Carrasco.  You guys keep talking about Carrasco and how bad he is, well Garcia sucks just as much.  The Sox win this game at the very most 50% of the time.



What do you think of the steam in this game?  It looks like the pick is Chicago but does Manny starting have an impact and sway this steam to the point where it is irrelevant?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 3901
Posted: #18
yo 165 why FLA so much this week and especially today? cause olsen blows? or u think there gonna do how they do every year and go hard at the end?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 18777
Posted: #19

Quote Originally Posted by bell30:

165 do you have a bigger bet every day? would that be your pick of the day type of pick? Also have you noticed if it has hit more than your other picks?

I am 10-6 on 5 unit plays this year, 99% of the time I flat bet risking 2.5 and the first month of the year I risked 2 units.  Flat betting is the way you should bet most of the time, it takes away from chasing most importantly but doesn't minimize your wins.  You should always stay consistant in anything in life.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 18777
Posted: #20

Quote Originally Posted by FollowMeHere:



What's your take on the amount of games toplay?  Do you ever minimize your games played?

Find value and bet, it shouldn't matter if it's one game or 10 games.  99.8% of people who play lots of games a day chase or are action junkies and that's the only reason they play a high volume. 

Remember I don't pay juice like everyone else does so I can get away w/it much more.  But if I feel there is value I bet and never concern myself with games played.   I also take my games at once, it's not like I'm waiting for a SanJose St at midnight to bet a game.  I decide early in the day most of the time what I like so no chasing occurs.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 467
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:

It's more a play on a excellent number I am getting because to take Garcia laying road chalk is comical.  It should be Indians or nothing.  Garcia has just as much chance of getting shelled as Carrasco.  You guys keep talking about Carrasco and how bad he is, well Garcia sucks just as much.  The Sox win this game at the very most 50% of the time.


 I completely agree with your logic on this, there are a lot of confident Sox backers today and I just don't think it's as easy a pick as people make it out to be.  Tribe or nothing on this, good luck all!  May even put a bit on the reverse runline.  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 2852
Posted: #22

165,

What is "flat betting" exactly? How do you apply that in your maney management?

Thanks

 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 740
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by evilelvis:

165,

What is "flat betting" exactly? How do you apply that in your maney management?

Thanks

 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 740
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by evilelvis:

165,

What is "flat betting" exactly? How do you apply that in your maney management?

Thanks

 same amount each bet

 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 6849
Posted: #25
gl today 165, really like the Stros today.

Take the Utes tomorrow buddy.
All Forums | MLB Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.