All Forums | NHL Betting Forum

NORBERT

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1324
Posts: 34
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 22266
Posted: #1

KINGS VS HAWKS

LET'S DO THIS

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 22502
Posted: #2
Hawks in 5.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 9304
Posted: #3
Kings in 6 
Hawks don't look good Hookem. if they had trouble with a mediocre Red Wing team i can only imagine how ugly they will look against Quick and the Kings.Lots of turnovers for Chicago and it will get worse with high pressure Kings forecheck.Idk,i could be wrong and maybe Chicago will turn it up a notch but if they don;t it will be an early series.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 22502
Posted: #4
Quote Originally Posted by tonydan:

Kings in 6 
Hawks don't look good Hookem. if they had trouble with a mediocre Red Wing team i can only imagine how ugly they will look against Quick and the Kings.Lots of turnovers for Chicago and it will get worse with high pressure Kings forecheck.Idk,i could be wrong and maybe Chicago will turn it up a notch but if they don;t it will be an early series.

Mediocre Red Wings team?

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2013
Posts: 6576
Posted: #5

      I LOVE IT MAN , JUST I WANTED!!!!

two monsters going at it,great for the fans to see man.. we are still cool,just in opposite sides .  Congrats on the Hawks,freaking ref almost gave it away;that ref needs to go to church Sunday and confess his sins..

 GL buddy,Kings are packing their bags.....

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 22266
Posted: #6
Quote Originally Posted by tonydan:

Kings in 6 
Hawks don't look good Hookem. if they had trouble with a mediocre Red Wing team i can only imagine how ugly they will look against Quick and the Kings.Lots of turnovers for Chicago and it will get worse with high pressure Kings forecheck.Idk,i could be wrong and maybe Chicago will turn it up a notch but if they don;t it will be an early series.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 22266
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by Norbert:

      I LOVE IT MAN , JUST I WANTED!!!!

two monsters going at it,great for the fans to see man.. we are still cool,just in opposite sides .  Congrats on the Hawks,freaking ref almost gave it away;that ref needs to go to church Sunday and confess his sins..

 GL buddy,Kings are packing their bags.....


Cheers bro 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 9304
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by HeadOverHeart:


Mediocre Red Wings team?

absolutely. did u see all the odd man rushes they gave up to Chicago in this series? If not for Howard this may have been over a long time ago.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 9304
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by HookEmHorns22:


u know i love ya man,but i call'em as i see'em.no doubt i wish you best of with your team though.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 4280
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by tonydan:

Kings in 6 
Hawks don't look good Hookem. if they had trouble with a mediocre Red Wing team i can only imagine how ugly they will look against Quick and the Kings.Lots of turnovers for Chicago and it will get worse with high pressure Kings forecheck.Idk,i could be wrong and maybe Chicago will turn it up a notch but if they don;t it will be an early series.


Are you joking??? If Quick has been the best goalie in these playoffs, Howard has been right there with him, combine that with the babcocks defensive game plans and that teams ability to defend with all yet jump up the ice immediately the entire series....that is what you call a very good team, they knocked out the 2nd see and they took the best team in hockey (going by reg season stats) to game 7.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 4280
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by tonydan:

u know i love ya man,but i call'em as i see'em.no doubt i wish you best of with your team though.


Well then you need to go see an optometrist.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2001
Posts: 85256
Posted: #12

Kings in 6

sorry Hook'Em BUT I will book with tonydan. IF "defense wins championships" theI think the Kings D esp with "Johannas Schnell" is the difference

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 9304
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by bhawksfan:



Are you joking??? If Quick has been the best goalie in these playoffs, Howard has been right there with him, combine that with the babcocks defensive game plans and that teams ability to defend with all yet jump up the ice immediately the entire series....that is what you call a very good team, they knocked out the 2nd see and they took the best team in hockey (going by reg season stats) to game 7.
see post #8 for this 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 9304
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by bhawksfan:



Well then you need to go see an optometrist.
  i already wear prescription glasses 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 22266
Posted: #15

I love this site

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 22266
Posted: #16
Let's play a drinking game

Open a thread on Covers and take ONE DRINK for every disagreement in that thread. Open another thread. Repeat until drunk

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 4280
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by tonydan:

  i already wear prescription glasses 



lol I m just messin...but I fully disagree with your view on the red wings, the kings are a more physical team but they wont be able to take the ice away from the hawks skilled forwards as well as Detroit imo. Only time will tell...
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 9304
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by bhawksfan:



Are you joking??? If Quick has been the best goalie in these playoffs, Howard has been right there with him, combine that with the babcocks defensive game plans and that teams ability to defend with all yet jump up the ice immediately the entire series....that is what you call a very good team, they knocked out the 2nd see and they took the best team in hockey (going by reg season stats) to game 7.
not sure what series you're watching but there was a ton of odd man rushes for Chicago.Howard was the star of this series.Hawks won't get many of those against Kings air tight defense and if they do Quick is plan "b".
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 9304
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by bhawksfan:




lol I m just messin...but I fully disagree with your view on the red wings, the kings are a more physical team but they wont be able to take the ice away from the hawks skilled forwards as well as Detroit imo. Only time will tell...
it's all good dude  there's nothing wrong with disagreeing.it opens up discussions
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 4280
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by LeRinkRat:

Kings in 6

sorry Hook'Em BUT I will book with tonydan. IF "defense wins championships" theI think the Kings D esp with "Johannas Schnell" is the difference



Hawks were the best defensive team in the league, giving up the least amount of goals in the entire league and 16 less than the Kings, don't forget that...I know Quick is hot and LA is playing better in the postseason but just remindin ya :P
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 4280
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by Flutiemaniac341:


Ok. Calm down. I have Howard as an elite goalie as well. It's big reason I took Detroit in an alt series bet. But honestly, if ur gonna go off on someone saying Quick is on another level. Ur opinion then needs to be ignored for obvious reasons. 


Its the Leafs fault, they caused this argument and all other problems in the world. Are you happy now?
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 22502
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by HookEmHorns22:

Let's play a drinking game

Open a thread on Covers and take ONE DRINK for every disagreement in that thread. Open another thread. Repeat until drunk


Do that in the NBA forum and you'd be dead in 20 minutes due to alcohol poisoning.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 4280
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by Flutiemaniac341:


I caught you being ridiculous and that's ur comeback, bravo, homer! Way to have another mature discussion.

Ignored.


You respond to my post and then say ignored? Makes sense....

So my opinion that the Red Wings are a legit team with a very good goalie is ridiculousness, but you saying that the "leafs fluked their way into the playoffs" is what a logical follower of the game would say?

Not going to have one of these silly covers arguments, so for me this ends here. Have a good night.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2013
Posts: 1032
Posted: #24
I love you hook'em please post more thread titles with caps lock , e.h HOOK'EM MONDAY PUCKS
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 815
Posted: #25

There goes Fluiti again being an a-hole

Kings in 5

And Wings were a tough out, make no bones about it

 Hook

All Forums | NHL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.