All Forums | NHL Betting Forum

LA KINGS UNDERS?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 613
Posts: 19
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 207
Posted: #1
Has there been any team like this in NHL history where they have this many UNDERS???


I mean, Taking UNDER 5  REQUIRES YOU TO PAY -140 JUICE.  That is unreal and it keeps on hitting too.  I mean, i'm shocked they go under 5 more than it PUSHES.

 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #2
Whenever you see 5 juiced to the under, that's almost an automatic under play for me.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 22266
Posted: #3
Might be under 3 at this rate haha 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 207
Posted: #4
What constitutes as juiced to the under?  Does -110 count?  I mean, taking OVER 5 would be getting +120.  That is crazy. 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 22266
Posted: #5
-110 isn't too much juice, say like -150 or -140 something like that
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4556
Posted: #6
Damn a goal in LA
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 207
Posted: #7
What about Under 5  -120 or -125.  Is that considered juiced?


At what number is it considered juiced?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 3310
Posted: #8
might see some 4.5 in the second half, who knows. 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 22266
Posted: #9
Anything with a - is considered juiced...but -110 isn't that much
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 22266
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by kerryjop:

What about Under 5  -120 or -125.  Is that considered juiced?


At what number is it considered juiced?

You know what the + and - in front of the numbers means right? 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 207
Posted: #11
Yes i do.  Anytime you are laying -101 or worst, you are laying juice.

But when you say juiced totals, I'm thinking -120 or more.
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #12

In this case It's any juice under 5.  Juice under 5 is a very rare thing.  Sans some playoff games of course.

Juice of -120 or more under 5 is like seeing a shooting star.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 207
Posted: #13
Yes thats what I mean.  But this LA Kings team is getting lot of UNDER 5 juiced at -120 or more and its hitting too.  I'm shocked at how many UNDER 5 THERE ARE. 

I mean, they go UNDER 5 MORE THAN PUSHING ON 5.

How sick is that?
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #14

Quote Originally Posted by kerryjop:

Yes thats what I mean.  But this LA Kings team is getting lot of UNDER 5 juiced at -120 or more and its hitting too.  I'm shocked at how many UNDER 5 THERE ARE. 

I mean, they go UNDER 5 MORE THAN PUSHING ON 5.

How sick is that?

It's the perfect under storm.  Quick just being a beast in goal and no scoring. 

Need to check out the Blues.  Sinch HItch took over they have a number of 5's also. Although more often than not they will push on thier 5's

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 207
Posted: #15
Will there be 4.5's soon for the Kings?  I never seen so many 1-0 games ever.
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #16

Quote Originally Posted by kerryjop:

Will there be 4.5's soon for the Kings?  I never seen so many 1-0 games ever.

I don't think they will do that untill the playoffs. That's if they make the playoffs.  

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 406
Posted: #17

Quote Originally Posted by kerryjop:

Has there been any team like this in NHL history where they have this many UNDERS???


I mean, Taking UNDER 5  REQUIRES YOU TO PAY -140 JUICE.  That is unreal and it keeps on hitting too.  I mean, i'm shocked they go under 5 more than it PUSHES.

devils years ago were an under machine

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 207
Posted: #18
What was the devils under record?  Was it like the kings?
 
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #19

Quote Originally Posted by kerryjop:

What was the devils under record?  Was it like the kings?

I would have to go back and research the years.  It may of been before the lockout though.

All Forums | NHL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.