DUANNANANANANAA !! yea i know the nucks are going home to close it out... but give me the sharks in a must win at +160 or more any day gunna wait this one out till later today and hope to grab it at +170 +180 altho i dont see the sharks winning this series obviously i would still like to see it go to 6 or 7 games from a hockey fans point of view
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
DUANNANANANANAA !! yea i know the nucks are going home to close it out... but give me the sharks in a must win at +160 or more any day gunna wait this one out till later today and hope to grab it at +170 +180 altho i dont see the sharks winning this series obviously i would still like to see it go to 6 or 7 games from a hockey fans point of view
hate to say it BUT I have to agree with Buffalo11, IHIOUSE. I think it's "Oh WAITER, I Will Have The GRILLED SHARK" tonight in 'Couver.
Canucks have blown home game fives against the Bhawks and Preds. knowing that "rep" I think they "bare down" and win this one tonight. seeing a couple Sharks +170 here in Las Vegas. it's "a nice price" BUT
0
hate to say it BUT I have to agree with Buffalo11, IHIOUSE. I think it's "Oh WAITER, I Will Have The GRILLED SHARK" tonight in 'Couver.
Canucks have blown home game fives against the Bhawks and Preds. knowing that "rep" I think they "bare down" and win this one tonight. seeing a couple Sharks +170 here in Las Vegas. it's "a nice price" BUT
GL I'm on Van though; I actually think the value is on Vancouver. Eight teams have taken a 3-1 series lead in the Conference Finals by winning Games 1 and 2 at home, then losing Game 3 but winning Game 4 on the road. Those eight teams have advanced to the Stanley Cup Finals every time.Getting back to the Conference Finals, seven of those eight teams went on to end the series at home in Game 5. Historically Van should win this game 7 out of 8 times, meaning the line should be around -300. Obviously the books can not put out a number like that, so the value is there in Vancouver at -180. If sharks do win, the remaining numbers will be low enough where Vancouver can continue to be played at great value
0
GL I'm on Van though; I actually think the value is on Vancouver. Eight teams have taken a 3-1 series lead in the Conference Finals by winning Games 1 and 2 at home, then losing Game 3 but winning Game 4 on the road. Those eight teams have advanced to the Stanley Cup Finals every time.Getting back to the Conference Finals, seven of those eight teams went on to end the series at home in Game 5. Historically Van should win this game 7 out of 8 times, meaning the line should be around -300. Obviously the books can not put out a number like that, so the value is there in Vancouver at -180. If sharks do win, the remaining numbers will be low enough where Vancouver can continue to be played at great value
GL I'm on Van though; I actually think the value is on Vancouver. Eight teams have taken a 3-1 series lead in the Conference Finals by winning Games 1 and 2 at home, then losing Game 3 but winning Game 4 on the road. Those eight teams have advanced to the Stanley Cup Finals every time.Getting back to the Conference Finals, seven of those eight teams went on to end the series at home in Game 5. Historically Van should win this game 7 out of 8 times, meaning the line should be around -300. Obviously the books can not put out a number like that, so the value is there in Vancouver at -180. If sharks do win, the remaining numbers will be low enough where Vancouver can continue to be played at great value
NICE STATS
We are the priests of the temples of syrinx
0
Quote Originally Posted by VLR:
GL I'm on Van though; I actually think the value is on Vancouver. Eight teams have taken a 3-1 series lead in the Conference Finals by winning Games 1 and 2 at home, then losing Game 3 but winning Game 4 on the road. Those eight teams have advanced to the Stanley Cup Finals every time.Getting back to the Conference Finals, seven of those eight teams went on to end the series at home in Game 5. Historically Van should win this game 7 out of 8 times, meaning the line should be around -300. Obviously the books can not put out a number like that, so the value is there in Vancouver at -180. If sharks do win, the remaining numbers will be low enough where Vancouver can continue to be played at great value
GL I'm on Van though; I actually think the value is on Vancouver. Eight teams have taken a 3-1 series lead in the Conference Finals by winning Games 1 and 2 at home, then losing Game 3 but winning Game 4 on the road. Those eight teams have advanced to the Stanley Cup Finals every time.Getting back to the Conference Finals, seven of those eight teams went on to end the series at home in Game 5. Historically Van should win this game 7 out of 8 times, meaning the line should be around -300. Obviously the books can not put out a number like that, so the value is there in Vancouver at -180. If sharks do win, the remaining numbers will be low enough where Vancouver can continue to be played at great value
where u been hiding? good stats. don't know if relevant- but kudos to your way of thinking.
ih- yeah hockey should last longer- i refuse to watch baseball. might bet on it but can't watch that ugly sport
0
Quote Originally Posted by VLR:
GL I'm on Van though; I actually think the value is on Vancouver. Eight teams have taken a 3-1 series lead in the Conference Finals by winning Games 1 and 2 at home, then losing Game 3 but winning Game 4 on the road. Those eight teams have advanced to the Stanley Cup Finals every time.Getting back to the Conference Finals, seven of those eight teams went on to end the series at home in Game 5. Historically Van should win this game 7 out of 8 times, meaning the line should be around -300. Obviously the books can not put out a number like that, so the value is there in Vancouver at -180. If sharks do win, the remaining numbers will be low enough where Vancouver can continue to be played at great value
where u been hiding? good stats. don't know if relevant- but kudos to your way of thinking.
ih- yeah hockey should last longer- i refuse to watch baseball. might bet on it but can't watch that ugly sport
where u been hiding? good stats. don't know if relevant- but kudos to your way of thinking.
ih- yeah hockey should last longer- i refuse to watch baseball. might bet on it but can't watch that ugly sport
Agreed, would like to see the hockey go 7s in both series for entertainment. Baseball is a rare sport that is better read than watched. Its like a book. As far as the stats, you are probably right in the relevance of them. I'm not too big on playing trends and stats because each game is its own entity. But I do like historical stats like this , its why I played Van G7 vs Chi and SJ G7 vs Det, This play is purely the value of the line compared to the likelihood of it happening. I'd like to see sharks win but I'm on Van and will be again if it is a game 6. BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by burley:
where u been hiding? good stats. don't know if relevant- but kudos to your way of thinking.
ih- yeah hockey should last longer- i refuse to watch baseball. might bet on it but can't watch that ugly sport
Agreed, would like to see the hockey go 7s in both series for entertainment. Baseball is a rare sport that is better read than watched. Its like a book. As far as the stats, you are probably right in the relevance of them. I'm not too big on playing trends and stats because each game is its own entity. But I do like historical stats like this , its why I played Van G7 vs Chi and SJ G7 vs Det, This play is purely the value of the line compared to the likelihood of it happening. I'd like to see sharks win but I'm on Van and will be again if it is a game 6. BOL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.