For those who want a good, late night "fake ticket" laugh...

Question

Check out AK415&#x27;s thread. You won&#x27;t be disappointed.

rangerz2478 · Answer

Check out AK415&#x27;s thread. You won&#x27;t be disappointed.

ruxpin810 · Answer

i saw that too that&#x27;s cold tho brotha, starting a thread about it

rangerz2478 · Answer

Hahahaha I know man and I wouldn&#x27;t do it if the guy didn&#x27;t talk shit to others and come off as a complete douchebag on a daily basis. I mean check out his first post..."again fade me if you like, because i sure do fade some of you guys...."He deserves this shit and I&#x27;m enjoying every second of it.

ruxpin810 · Answer

i feel you bro. i&#x27;m fairly new to covers and i was surprised to see so much haters when we&#x27;re all here to make money definitely got a good laugh off that fake ticket tho

Ranger123 · Answer

Aren&#x27;t you the guy who posted the fake ticket with the Blazers ML &#x2B;6000 Live wagering last week

rangerz2478 · Answer

Considering I posted that for $5 amongst other wagers and had people who followed live wagering back me up in the price, it was far from fake. Not try though.

Ranger123 · Answer

There was no way that game was &#x2B;6000 on the ML.  Most the Blazers were down during that game in the last 3 minutes was 8 points.  You need to quit lying.  &#x2B;1000ML  was the right price but even other posters say thats a lie with &#x2B;6000 at no point were they that high on the ML.

Ranger123 · Answer

Also, good job on posting the ticket AFTER THEY WON.  You obviously would not have posted the ticket if they lost

rangerz2478 · Answer

They were down 6 pts, Denver had the ball, and there was 1:30 on the clock. If you DON&#x27;T think the price was &#x2B;6000 at that point in time you are simply lost. Since you are SO deadfast on thinking I lied about it, how about you put your money where your mouth is and we&#x27;ll both put up $1000 to a moderator and we can call 5dimes to see how "fake" the ticket was. Besides if I was REALLY going to fake a ticket, you&#x27;d think I&#x27;d do it for more then five bucks. My offer stands.

rangerz2478 · Answer

And again, the only poster in that thread who thought it was a lie was UMF. Check him out and see the kind of credibility he has on this site. If you wanna side with him, be my guest.

badreligion · Answer

someone find that thread during football season and post link here, it was way funnier then this one, it was a 10 page thread

rangerz2478 · Answer

Here is the thread...https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=22&amp;sub=100989987Sinkhole even quoted betfair at &#x2B;9900 yet I lied about my &#x2B;6000.

Ranger123 · Answer

How can a team down 6 points without the ball at home with 1:30 on the clock get a price of +6000 on the ML? That number is not possible. So the true odds are they got less than 2 percent chance of winning in that situation?

+1000 odds you posted makes more sense and is more accurate. How in the world can a team down 6 points with 1:30 left get +6000 odds? Unless it was a line error, then that line is incorrect that is all.

Of course you wouldn't put the fake ticket for more than 5 bucks. If you did, then we all know its a big lie. This way, it doesn't look that BIG of a lie but smart posters know you are lying.

rangerz2478 · Answer

Once again, stop talking and put your money where your mouth is. We will both send money to a mod and the mod can call 5dimes with all the ticket info to find out just how fake it was.

Ranger123 · Answer

You telling me a team down 6 points with 1:30 left AT HOME nonetheless even without the out is TRUE ODDS should be +6000?

If they were down say 16 points, then yes the odds are around +6000. But 6 points warrants +6000 odds?'

+1000 is the correct odds in that situation.

badreligion · Answer

the heat down a shitload were plus 3k at their peak, now i know for sure there was no plus 6k offered after this ticket

rangerz2478 · Answer

Lets make this easy and I&#x27;ll give you a quick trivia question to see just how much you know/knew about the ingame prices on that game. The Blazers were down 3 pts, 20 seconds on the clock in regulation and had the ball. (before Roy hit the 3) What price did 5dimes post?

Ranger123 · Answer

As usual, you are avoiding the question rangerz.  Answer that question.As far as being down 3 with 20 seconds left, i say the correct odds is around &#x2B;300.

rangerz2478 · Answer

What am I avoiding? Whether the line posted was what it should have been at the time, that is the line I GOT. Any gambler who makes money exploits bad lines posted by the linesmakers. I thought +6000 was high for that situation and that's why I bet it. And in terms of the situation I presented...

NOPE.

Revisit my thread and check out the bets I placed at 1:05. THOSE bets were placed at the situation I just presented to you. +300 isn't close to the correct answer, it SHOULD have been +600 roughly with the fact you are AT BEST going to overtime in that scenario.

Regardless, none of this matters. The reason I made any of those bets were because they were higher than the prices I thought they should have been given the situation. (which is what ALL bets should be about)

Speaking of dodging the question...A yes or no to my proposal since you still think I am lying?

rangerz2478 · Answer

The funny thing is, you act like you have a clue about probability and percentages, yet you think that should be +300 in that spot?!?

LOL a +300 means a guy could take -300 on the other side knowing OT is the absolute worst case scenario and have minimal risk due to the fact he can get out (with a loss of course) in OT.

For example, bet $300 to win $100.

Then if ABSOLUTE WORST CASE SCENARIO HAPPENS.

Bet $200 to win $200 on the otherside. (and accept a $100 loss on either side)

By doing this, the gambler just risked $100 to win $100 that the game doesn't go to ot. You think OT has a 50% chance of happening in this scenario?

Ranger123 · Answer

Of course &#x2B;6000 odds were high odds.  That is 100 percent a bad line.  How in the world do you think that wasn&#x27;t HIGH for someone who says they know the odds.  The line you got &#x2B;1000ML was the correct odds. If you said yes i got &#x2B;6000 ML odds but it was probably a bad line, then i would have not say anything to argue.  How many points were the Blazers down when you got &#x2B;6000?  I think it was around 8 or so?  Do you agree you bet a bad line then?  Because in that situation there is 0 percent a team down 8 or so with less than 2 minutes left get &#x2B;6000 ML odds.

Ranger123 · Answer

How in the world is OT worst case scenario. Blazers could hit a quick 3 and then Nuggets turn it over and Blazers can score before OT. Or they score a quick 2 and foul denver. Then he misses 1 or both and portland hits a 3 pointer to end the game.

No wonder no one here likes you in this forum. You seem to think you know everything

rangerz2478 · Answer

I am willing to admit I got a great price on those ingame lines. WHY ELSE WOULD I HAVE BET THEM otherwise?

The funny thing is, you can't/won't admit your +300 proposal with 20 seconds left is wrong. That is 100000% the wrong line and if you were a linesmaker you would have gotten absolutely destroyed by posting lines like that.

rangerz2478 · Answer

And with 20 seconds left down 3, just how much of "those" probabilities should be factored into the line? Give me your percentage probability of the Blazers winning in regulation in that spot. Seriously.

For those who want a good, late night "fake ticket" laugh...

Hot Forum Topics