| Author: |
[NFL Betting] Topic: What is the Ravens go up 7-0? |
|
Doodlebop |
 View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 33
Location: |
#1 Posted: 1/16/2013 6:32:13 PM
Also just a thought. As boring as the Texans offense was last week, they did come with-in one possession of covering the spread. Ravens have a much more prolific offense then Texans. I don't think this is a hard one.
|
|
quote |
|
shrimp1958 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Legend
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 40008
Location: Maryland |
#2 Posted: 1/16/2013 6:38:17 PM Texans 416 points...
Ravens 398 points.....
 
Clueless Clown..... |
|
quote |
|
buffniner |
RSI  |
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 115
Location: New York |
#3 Posted: 1/16/2013 6:38:20 PM 43-13 . the problem is not the start its the finish. pats don't let off the gas like many teams i can c it being 31-24 late with a pats td or fg to cover 38 -24 or 34-24 |
|
quote |
|
illnasty10 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1043
Location: |
#4 Posted: 1/16/2013 7:57:48 PM |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
djuengoe |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 477
Location: |
#5 Posted: 1/16/2013 8:20:53 PM Great point Dood ! I'm all over the Raven's anyway, but Brady Bunch Backer's would be wise to give that some thought.
|
|
quote |
|
|
|
Cooler999 |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Captain
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6191
Location: California |
#6 Posted: 1/16/2013 8:25:14 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by illnasty10:
PAts roll man. They will be up 14-0 early in the 1st quarter and then take off late
I see it the other way..
NE's MO is...close game for 3 quarters...then bury them on the 4th.
|
|
quote |
|
Doodlebop |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 33
Location: |
#7 Posted: 1/16/2013 8:30:46 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by shrimp1958: Texans 416 points...
Ravens 398 points.....
Clueless Clown.....
Stats are for squares. Thats why there is so many, so many categories and most importantly they are made so readily available to the public squares like yourself. Im sure Denver had more points scored in the regular season then the Ravens and how did that work out? You probably had Denver.
|
|
quote |
|
tonyrome |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1753
Location: United States |
#8 Posted: 1/16/2013 8:48:32 PM
Who cares if Ravens go up first.
You can't look at it like that.
How far down were the Pats to the 9ers?
|
|
quote |
|
bunny651 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2859
Location: |
#9 Posted: 1/16/2013 9:38:10 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by Doodlebop:
For all New England backers. If you have NE at -9 and the Ravens go up 7-0, that means NE is going to have to score 3x's (with 2 scores having to be a touchdown) in a row without the Ravens answering. Do you think that is realistic? If you answer yes then bet NE. If the answer is no then the bet is Ravens.
Also just a thought. As boring as the Texans offense was last week, they did come with-in one possession of covering the spread. Ravens have a much more prolific offense then Texans. I don't think this is a hard one.
That will be like saying, if NE goes up 7-0, all they have to do is a FG better scoring-wise than Hou to cover. |
|
quote |
|
bunny651 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2859
Location: |
#10 Posted: 1/16/2013 9:38:48 PM ^^
the rest of the way |
|
quote |
|
CalBear |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
MVP
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16744
Location: California |
#11 Posted: 1/16/2013 11:06:47 PM |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
Laroja |
RSI  |
Captain
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 9684
Location: Ontario |
#12 Posted: 1/17/2013 11:19:05 AM
|
|
quote |
|
Doodlebop |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 33
Location: |
#13 Posted: 1/17/2013 11:28:01 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by bunny651:
That will be like saying, if NE goes up 7-0, all they have to do is a FG better scoring-wise than Hou to cover.
But the question is If the Ravens go up first 7-0. Thats what this thread is about. Also SF was up 4 tds when the Pats came back. SF lost intensity and played soft after such a big lead. I think you would have an argument if the Pats were leading by 28 points in that game.
Ravens can also score in a hurry. More importantly and its the obvious bait. -9 spread asking for action on the Pats. A bait spread covers very seldom. The Pats did it last week. Can they do it 2 weeks in a row? If i was betting the Pats I'd feel better if the line was -10.5
|
|
quote |
|
Europa |
RSI  |
Legend
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 31116
Location: California |
#14 Posted: 1/17/2013 11:37:31 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by Doodlebop:
But the question is If the Ravens go up first 7-0. Thats what this thread is about. Also SF was up 4 tds when the Pats came back. SF lost intensity and played soft after such a big lead. I think you would have an argument if the Pats were leading by 28 points in that game.
Ravens can also score in a hurry. More importantly and its the obvious bait. -9 spread asking for action on the Pats. A bait spread covers very seldom. The Pats did it last week. Can they do it 2 weeks in a row? If i was betting the Pats I'd feel better if the line was -10.5
It's interesting that Harbaugh brothers would share game plans to beat Pats, John certainly very familiar with Pats' schemes and Jim's team did beat NE not long ago at Foxborough. |
|
quote |
|
abcole27 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 9
Location: |
#15 Posted: 1/17/2013 6:52:24 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by Doodlebop:
But the question is If the Ravens go up first 7-0. Thats what this thread is about. Also SF was up 4 tds when the Pats came back. SF lost intensity and played soft after such a big lead. I think you would have an argument if the Pats were leading by 28 points in that game.
Ravens can also score in a hurry. More importantly and its the obvious bait. -9 spread asking for action on the Pats. A bait spread covers very seldom. The Pats did it last week. Can they do it 2 weeks in a row? If i was betting the Pats I'd feel better if the line was -10.5
You'd feel better if the line was -10.5?! I would argue that Vegas is baiting the public to take Baltimore, which is working. There is no way that 9 points are warranted for the Pats to give a surging Baltimore team, also given all the trends. |
|
quote |
|
bunny651 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2859
Location: |
#16 Posted: 1/17/2013 7:27:37 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by Doodlebop:
But the question is If the Ravens go up first 7-0. Thats what this thread is about. Also SF was up 4 tds when the Pats came back. SF lost intensity and played soft after such a big lead. I think you would have an argument if the Pats were leading by 28 points in that game.
Ravens can also score in a hurry. More importantly and its the obvious bait. -9 spread asking for action on the Pats. A bait spread covers very seldom. The Pats did it last week. Can they do it 2 weeks in a row? If i was betting the Pats I'd feel better if the line was -10.5
Based on these two teams, I don't think it's an obvious bait at all. They will have plently of action at 9 on Bal. |
|
quote |
|
Doodlebop |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 33
Location: |
#17 Posted: 1/17/2013 8:15:57 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by abcole27:
You'd feel better if the line was -10.5?! I would argue that Vegas is baiting the public to take Baltimore, which is working. There is no way that 9 points are warranted for the Pats to give a surging Baltimore team, also given all the trends.
If i was betting the Pats I would feel better about a -10.5 instead of -9. -9 is an important tell. Its fading the key number of 10. Which asks for action on the favorite. At -10.5 the action according to "key numbers" is baiting the public to take the dog. Vegas wants more money on the Pats right now. Why. If you take a close look at line history. Lines that are -2.5,-6, -6.5, -9,-9.5 have a bad history of covering. while -3.5,-7,-7.5 -10,-10.5 have a very good history of covering.
|
|
quote |
|
THESHOOTER |
RSI  |
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1814
Location: Nevada |
#18 Posted: 1/18/2013 2:26:13 AM |
|
quote |