All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

OAK/SD PICK!!!!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1556
Posts: 15
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 79
Posted: #1

how can you not go with OAK, divison game and Rivers cant do anything right now

OAK +7.5

GL

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 931
Posted: #2

hmmm how can you not?

1. carson palmer

2. in SD

3. no mcfadden

4. oak just lost to tebow

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 338
Posted: #3
theres gonna be alot of dissppointed people thinking the raiders will make a game of it.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 117
Posted: #4
Quote Originally Posted by NCState2008:

hmmm how can you not?

1. carson palmer - CP had what 4 days to learn a new system in the OAK/KC game, he played terrible. Last week after a bye and time to get a grasp of his new system, he threw for 332 yards and 3TD's (in a game Oak lead most of the way). I know he had 3INT but regradless he IMPROVED GREATLY since his first game.

2. in SD - Almost zero homefield advatge here. There will be almost as many Raider fans in the stands as ther will be SD fans, the Chargers do not have a true homefiled advatage in general and even less of a homefield advatage when they play OAK.

3. no mcfadden - M Bush has done an EXCELLENT job filling in. Is he as good as DMac? No but he is still a tough bruiser, he moves the chains and is great in goal line situations.. His numbers the last 2 weeks as a starer 17 for 99yds and 19-for 96yds... terrific job so far, this guy is a very underrated backup and more than capable of carrying the load w/ Dmac out.

4. oak just lost to tebow- Don't look now but Tebow is 2-1

SD is playing its 3rd game in 11 days and coming off a gut wrenching loss.... Personally, I'll take the points in what should be a close, tougher than expected divisional matchup... i'll prob throw a small wager at OAK ML also just in case they squeak it out.

 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 931
Posted: #5
look we all no palmer still had some talent but he hasnt shown me anything to pick oak...yes 3 tds but those int's are the reason they lost, i no you can say the same about rivers but i just believe he a lot better then palmer and knows the plays and the players last names lol....yes bush has dont a good job but like i said to give him 30+ carries well see how he does but he hasnt had that in a long time
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 1826
Posted: #6
I think that there is WAAY to much going on here to bet a side, I LOVE the under, both coaches are going to play this one tight to the hip
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 45
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by Mason525:

 



And boom goes the dynamite.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 628
Posted: #8
Mason good points sir
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 15002
Posted: #9
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 881
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by NCState2008:

look we all no palmer still had some talent but he hasnt shown me anything to pick oak...yes 3 tds but those int's are the reason they lost, i no you can say the same about rivers but i just believe he a lot better then palmer and knows the plays and the players last names lol....yes bush has dont a good job but like i said to give him 30+ carries well see how he does but he hasnt had that in a long time

Palmer's 3 interceptions didnt cost them the game. It was the horrendous defense and special teams.  
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 573
Posted: #11
palmer sucks people have to stop living in his prime seasons with the bengals he sucked since his knee injury and is so overhyped its crazy. he has 6 interceptions in 6 quarters and he will have at least two more tonight. san diego rolls, and your right oaklands defense and special teams are horrendous and that will also continue tonight. this game will be one of the ones where the favorite and better team wins and covers.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 15753
Posted: #12
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 117
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by ScottomonZ:


Palmer's 3 interceptions didnt cost them the game. It was the horrendous defense and special teams.  

...and the 15 penalties for something like 130 yards... can't give up that much yardage and turn the ball over that much and win,

 If Oak cleans up their act (hopefully coaches got on them this week in pratice) they can win against what has to be an exahusted and deflated SD team.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 117
Posted: #14

Quote Originally Posted by NewEraNaciremA:

Mason good points sir

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 117
Posted: #15

I rule, seriously I do...just one awesome pick after the next. Then again i'm also very drunk right now but tomorrow will cure that.

Anyway, I love DOGS, it's my thing...cant wait to fine tune some dogies for Sunday...need to grab a couple ho's by the throat and shake some logic into them....Dal, SF, Pitt, Hou, Chi, which one's are the spankie of the week???  all good options just gotta pick the two best ones n get paid.... thank for tonight raiders...peace and advil till tomorrow.

All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.