All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Another Shady Ref call impacting the betting outcome

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 957
Posts: 18
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 8229
Posted: #1

Phatom hold call on Devry Henderson on a Icing Saint TD, which wouldve given Saint backers the win.

Add it to the phantom Bears hold against the Packers that changed the betting outcome in that game.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 1104
Posted: #2
wow fuck this shit hahahahahhaha
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 330
Posted: #3
oh man theyll get the first down and then run out the clock...
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 67927
Posted: #4
now payton goes for it which would have kept tampa alive instead of kicking a game icing field goal  
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 67927
Posted: #5
oh nevermind here comes the field goal. haha he had you guys shitting your pants 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 330
Posted: #6
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 67927
Posted: #7
now the question will be if tampa gets in field goal range will they kick it right away since they need 2 scores or go for the td
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 96
Posted: #8
no doubt niner.  this call was terrible, luckily my only play was tb 2h +3.5, but the phantom hold against the bears cost me +5k.

btw - i hope you were super heavy on the rams and fins last week.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 5363
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner:

Phatom hold call on Devry Henderson on a Icing Saint TD, which wouldve given Saint backers the win.

Add it to the phantom Bears hold against the Packers that changed the betting outcome in that game.

I'm a Saints backer and that call didn't effect my wager. Then again I have Saints ML, like the rest of you should. In the NFL , that's the only way to go.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 8229
Posted: #10

Quote Originally Posted by badlands:

now the question will be if tampa gets in field goal range will they kick it right away since they need 2 scores or go for the td

Hopefully they follow the Brown blueprint and do neither...

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 8229
Posted: #11

Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

I'm a Saints backer and that call didn't effect my wager. Then again I have Saints ML, like the rest of you should. In the NFL , that's the only way to go.

Betting a 9 point favorite on the ML????????


Even though you won, it is not very smart betting at all.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 67927
Posted: #12
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 5363
Posted: #13
Had parlay, USC, Stanford, Oklahoma, Oregon  Texans and Saints, all ML'S. No games were EVER in trouble of losing. 500 paid 490. Only games I played, positive 490 in 2 days. Pretty good if you "AXE" me. No high roller, but those teams were not losing, and they didn't
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 5363
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner:

Betting a 9 point favorite on the ML????????


Even though you won, it is not very smart betting at all.

I meant to put your quote in post #13
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 8229
Posted: #15

Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

Had parlay, USC, Stanford, Oklahoma, Oregon  Texans and Saints, all ML'S. No games were EVER in trouble of losing. 500 paid 490. Only games I played, positive 490 in 2 days. Pretty good if you "AXE" me. No high roller, but those teams were not losing, and they didn't

Nothing wrong with a ML parlay. I would be concerned if you were betting the game in isolation at ridiculously high juice.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 8229
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by bassaholicman:

no doubt niner.  this call was terrible, luckily my only play was tb 2h +3.5, but the phantom hold against the bears cost me +5k.

btw - i hope you were super heavy on the rams and fins last week.

Sorry, missed this...yeah I had a great afternoon. Gave some back in the later games, but was much heavier on the ugly teams last week. Hope you had a good week as well.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 1435
Posted: #17
I just put up a post about it...it cost me on two big bets that I had...I am so sick of having to wait to celebrate knowing that some shady ref wants to affect the outcome of a game.   I hope he dies.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1531
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

Had parlay, USC, Stanford, Oklahoma, Oregon  Texans and Saints, all ML'S. No games were EVER in trouble of losing. 500 paid 490. Only games I played, positive 490 in 2 days. Pretty good if you "AXE" me. No high roller, but those teams were not losing, and they didn't


If you have it as a parlay you should say that up front. Telling everyone that betting the ML on a 9 point NFL favorite is the only way to bet it just makes you sound stupid.

IMO
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.