The way I see it, with two team cant score, the line should be around 38 or 39, but its 41....Seems vegas is begging you to take UNDER.....The fish only avage 17pts per game,Jets 24pts, but score whole bunch from def score and special team also...
THAT tells me OVER is the right play.........
GL ALL
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
The way I see it, with two team cant score, the line should be around 38 or 39, but its 41....Seems vegas is begging you to take UNDER.....The fish only avage 17pts per game,Jets 24pts, but score whole bunch from def score and special team also...
The way I see it, with two team cant score, the line should be around 38 or 39, but its 41....Seems vegas is begging you to take UNDER.....The fish only avage 17pts per game,Jets 24pts, but score whole bunch from def score and special team also...
THAT tells me OVER is the right play.........
GL ALL
smart man i have the total average for this game at 46 this game should sail over
0
Quote Originally Posted by winner005:
The way I see it, with two team cant score, the line should be around 38 or 39, but its 41....Seems vegas is begging you to take UNDER.....The fish only avage 17pts per game,Jets 24pts, but score whole bunch from def score and special team also...
THAT tells me OVER is the right play.........
GL ALL
smart man i have the total average for this game at 46 this game should sail over
So the teams avg a combined total of exactly 41 and the line is fishy??
Thats because they both play NE , which has worst passing def, and jets score whole buch of def and special team pts against JAC and BAL...JETS off pts probably should be around 18 or 19 per game also.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JayBiz:
So the teams avg a combined total of exactly 41 and the line is fishy??
Thats because they both play NE , which has worst passing def, and jets score whole buch of def and special team pts against JAC and BAL...JETS off pts probably should be around 18 or 19 per game also.
Thats because they both play NE , which has worst passing def, and jets score whole buch of def and special team pts against JAC and BAL...JETS off pts probably should be around 18 or 19 per game also.
Based on that logic then wouldn't that mean it should go under.
0
Quote Originally Posted by winner005:
Thats because they both play NE , which has worst passing def, and jets score whole buch of def and special team pts against JAC and BAL...JETS off pts probably should be around 18 or 19 per game also.
Based on that logic then wouldn't that mean it should go under.
Based on that logic then wouldn't that mean it should go under.
EXacltly, it should go under, but the problem is 80% bettors is on UNDER and the line is not droping, that tells you it will go OVER, I dont know how, def pick 6, punt return TD, kickoff TD...some how, this game will go over....lol just like nobody will belive that yestarday DAL/NE score only 36......
0
Quote Originally Posted by tjohnsont:
Based on that logic then wouldn't that mean it should go under.
EXacltly, it should go under, but the problem is 80% bettors is on UNDER and the line is not droping, that tells you it will go OVER, I dont know how, def pick 6, punt return TD, kickoff TD...some how, this game will go over....lol just like nobody will belive that yestarday DAL/NE score only 36......
EXacltly, it should go under, but the problem is 80% bettors is on UNDER and the line is not droping, that tells you it will go OVER, I dont know how, def pick 6, punt return TD, kickoff TD...some how, this game will go over....lol just like nobody will belive that yestarday DAL/NE score only 36......
The total opened at 42 and quickly jumped to 43 only to be bet back down to where it stood at kickoff at 41.. so the line did drop. And where did you read that 80% of bettors are on the under? Everywhere I look I see an even 50/50 split on the O/U. Your research is just as good as your logic.
0
Quote Originally Posted by winner005:
EXacltly, it should go under, but the problem is 80% bettors is on UNDER and the line is not droping, that tells you it will go OVER, I dont know how, def pick 6, punt return TD, kickoff TD...some how, this game will go over....lol just like nobody will belive that yestarday DAL/NE score only 36......
The total opened at 42 and quickly jumped to 43 only to be bet back down to where it stood at kickoff at 41.. so the line did drop. And where did you read that 80% of bettors are on the under? Everywhere I look I see an even 50/50 split on the O/U. Your research is just as good as your logic.
The total opened at 42 and quickly jumped to 43 only to be bet back down to where it stood at kickoff at 41.. so the line did drop. And where did you read that 80% of bettors are on the under? Everywhere I look I see an even 50/50 split on the O/U. Your research is just as good as your logic.
MY logic is not good for you, cause you got UNDER...We will see whos right.
0
Quote Originally Posted by si1ly:
The total opened at 42 and quickly jumped to 43 only to be bet back down to where it stood at kickoff at 41.. so the line did drop. And where did you read that 80% of bettors are on the under? Everywhere I look I see an even 50/50 split on the O/U. Your research is just as good as your logic.
MY logic is not good for you, cause you got UNDER...We will see whos right.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.