well last week we had the patriots favored 9 over bills and tennessee favored by 7 over the broncos.
both cashed in money
this weeks ridiculous lines goes to
houston texans -4 over pittsburgh. now i am big homer fan but this is an absurd line. we shouldnt be favored this much over this team. i thought the line would be -1 or pickem to tell you the truth. this lines is fishy from the get go. might be a texan moneyline play and piittsburgh cover. who knows but our defense lets new orleans score 23 points in the fourth quarter. i am disgusted but on to this week
new england favored 4' over oakland. hello doesnt anybody know that new englands defense is FUCKING disgustingly terrible? they have given up 21, 24, and 34 points and 470, 448, and 488 yards in three games? oakland is gonna run all over there defense and control the time of possession. brady and company will score about 31 but will they hold oakland under this mark? i dont think so the over will probably be the play also. good luck gentlemen let the discussion began
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
well last week we had the patriots favored 9 over bills and tennessee favored by 7 over the broncos.
both cashed in money
this weeks ridiculous lines goes to
houston texans -4 over pittsburgh. now i am big homer fan but this is an absurd line. we shouldnt be favored this much over this team. i thought the line would be -1 or pickem to tell you the truth. this lines is fishy from the get go. might be a texan moneyline play and piittsburgh cover. who knows but our defense lets new orleans score 23 points in the fourth quarter. i am disgusted but on to this week
new england favored 4' over oakland. hello doesnt anybody know that new englands defense is FUCKING disgustingly terrible? they have given up 21, 24, and 34 points and 470, 448, and 488 yards in three games? oakland is gonna run all over there defense and control the time of possession. brady and company will score about 31 but will they hold oakland under this mark? i dont think so the over will probably be the play also. good luck gentlemen let the discussion began
Like both of your leans. When the line 1st came out in the Texans game, I thought, that is correct, it was -2 but moved to -4 & thought, no way. Steelers +4 looks solid to me.
0
Like both of your leans. When the line 1st came out in the Texans game, I thought, that is correct, it was -2 but moved to -4 & thought, no way. Steelers +4 looks solid to me.
The NE line is correct theres no way they could make that lower than 4.Its getting pretty hammered at -4 in fact it should have been a bit higher i thought.Remember why the lines are made theres no way they could hvae made this lower than 3
0
The NE line is correct theres no way they could make that lower than 4.Its getting pretty hammered at -4 in fact it should have been a bit higher i thought.Remember why the lines are made theres no way they could hvae made this lower than 3
jlt9889 NE's run defense is fine....its that dismal secondary that is borderline horrific. The problem is will Oakland spread the field and throw the ball DOWN the field. If they do they can win if they dont...they can only get so far with the ground and pound game. The value in this game was the Over. The moment this line was released I jumped all over 52. Oakland will have to score points to win this game. 21-24 points will not be enough.
Can Jason Campbell make it happen? Thats the real question here
.
0
jlt9889 NE's run defense is fine....its that dismal secondary that is borderline horrific. The problem is will Oakland spread the field and throw the ball DOWN the field. If they do they can win if they dont...they can only get so far with the ground and pound game. The value in this game was the Over. The moment this line was released I jumped all over 52. Oakland will have to score points to win this game. 21-24 points will not be enough.
Can Jason Campbell make it happen? Thats the real question here
Over in the NE game is now at 55.5 up from 52 in 2 days
Safe to say there is a ton of money coming in on this Over and it safe to say the books might be in a predicament come Sunday if they keep raising this line.
0
Over in the NE game is now at 55.5 up from 52 in 2 days
Safe to say there is a ton of money coming in on this Over and it safe to say the books might be in a predicament come Sunday if they keep raising this line.
regardless i thought new englan should only be favored by 3 or 3' same as the jets were. i cannot lay any money on a team with absolutely no defense. i m pretty sure oakland will win back to back games but who knows.
0
regardless i thought new englan should only be favored by 3 or 3' same as the jets were. i cannot lay any money on a team with absolutely no defense. i m pretty sure oakland will win back to back games but who knows.
jlt9889 NE's run defense is fine....its that dismal secondary that is borderline horrific. The problem is will Oakland spread the field and throw the ball DOWN the field. If they do they can win if they dont...they can only get so far with the ground and pound game. The value in this game was the Over. The moment this line was released I jumped all over 52. Oakland will have to score points to win this game. 21-24 points will not be enough.
Can Jason Campbell make it happen? Thats the real question here
.
Jason campbell will get it done. if henne, rivers, and fitzpatrick threw all over them i dont see any difference in campbell. im am playing oakland large. id ont know about the total cause its a college line now but oakland for sure
0
Quote Originally Posted by Smoke_O:
jlt9889 NE's run defense is fine....its that dismal secondary that is borderline horrific. The problem is will Oakland spread the field and throw the ball DOWN the field. If they do they can win if they dont...they can only get so far with the ground and pound game. The value in this game was the Over. The moment this line was released I jumped all over 52. Oakland will have to score points to win this game. 21-24 points will not be enough.
Can Jason Campbell make it happen? Thats the real question here
.
Jason campbell will get it done. if henne, rivers, and fitzpatrick threw all over them i dont see any difference in campbell. im am playing oakland large. id ont know about the total cause its a college line now but oakland for sure
Raiders just scored 34 against the Jets without some of their best recievers....This offense is for real and will definately put out a ton of points against the Pats.
GL
You learn more from losing than winning. You learn how to keep going.
0
Raiders just scored 34 against the Jets without some of their best recievers....This offense is for real and will definately put out a ton of points against the Pats.
jlt9889 NE's run defense is fine....its that dismal secondary that is borderline horrific. The problem is will Oakland spread the field and throw the ball DOWN the field. If they do they can win if they dont...they can only get so far with the ground and pound game. The value in this game was the Over. The moment this line was released I jumped all over 52. Oakland will have to score points to win this game. 21-24 points will not be enough.
Can Jason Campbell make it happen? Thats the real question here
.
and Jason Campbell could not get it done.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Smoke_O:
jlt9889 NE's run defense is fine....its that dismal secondary that is borderline horrific. The problem is will Oakland spread the field and throw the ball DOWN the field. If they do they can win if they dont...they can only get so far with the ground and pound game. The value in this game was the Over. The moment this line was released I jumped all over 52. Oakland will have to score points to win this game. 21-24 points will not be enough.
Can Jason Campbell make it happen? Thats the real question here
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.